io

>>9879800
oh look it's the pseudo-art retard again
reminder to kill yourself

>>9879860
im actually just hoping people can post some new clips because ive been away from /gif/ for a couple months so i havent been able to catch any new ones. thanks for your valuable input though.

>>9879896
nice try faggot

>>9879800
This is the kind of pornographic content I come live for

>>9879896
Lol what is even the point of doing this shit anymore? Everyone knows it's always you

Better just accept that nobody else posts your shit and that you won't be able to make it look like that's the case

>>9879975
you probably meant he can't make it look like the opposite is the case, but yes, we can only hope this cancerfag dies soon

I'll go ahead and venture a guess as well, he's currently creating another shit tier webm that includes screenshots from this thread

>>9879975
i dont know what to fucking tell you dude. im really sorry this shit upsets you so much. you always try to act like nobody gives a shit about these despite the many archived threads with hundred+ posts of people asking for more. i cant prove im not the OP (im not, hence why I havent posted any new fucking clips) but you cant prove i am. all i really want is for the actual OP to fucking show his goddamn face and post a link to some other site so that we can end this bullshit waiting game on /gif/ because im sick of dealing with whiny bitches like you in every single one of these fucking threads.

also, you high and mighty losers hate on this "pseudo-art" content as if us fans consider the OP to be the next Kubrick, but actually we just want to jerk off to his girlfriend and are hoping the next clips ends with a facial. the actual quality of the clips, like the cheap horror jump scares and shit, is wildly unimpressive and is on the level of many amateur YouTube filmmakers. the hardcore porn is what sets this dude apart and that is literally the only thing attracting us, so please go fuck yourselves.

>>9880105
there is nothing of quality included in the clips, it's literally a mash-up of absolute garbage on every level

also also, the most recent clips to surface completely destroy the old narrative that was going around which said the OP created the clips using a handful of amateur porn videos he found on some random porn site. there are a ton of clips of the girl that have nothing to do with porn and that are actually quite strange, so clearly the OP is intentionally making these videos himself and it is not found footage.

>>9880136
yes, and he is trying VERY hard to make it look like it's becoming a thing that many people like while he's the only one posting them over and over again
I mean, he's been caught doing this confirmedly so many times by now, and has even admitted to it

>>9880132
a bunch of the clips, with the sound turned off, are grade A fap material. sorry you dont feel the same. maybe you havent seen them all? honestly not sure if I have either but I think I have around 30-35 clips or so.

>>9880143
except on 3 occasions I was the one posting the clips and I am not the fucking OP so there are at least 2 people posting clips buddy. how the fuck did you confirm something on an anonymous image board? sounds fucking made up but ok.

>>9880165
>how the fuck did you confirm
maybe you don't know about thread statistics (plus, he admitted it himself, although he did not need to since it was obvious)

>>9880143
and are you the same idiot who was pushing that old narrative, and now that it absolutely doesnt make any sense, youve just moved on to spamming every thread like this?

>>9880174
since the chance that it's someone else is so incredibly low, the starting point is to assume it's him

>>9880173
you poor fucking loser. i remember the exact thread you are talking about because i fucking made it. you accused me of being the OP there as well and you thought I was trying to samefag but simply misinterpreted what i was saying and were so fucking excited to have *caught* someone samefagging you didnt realize it. if thats all the proof you need to "confirm" that i am in fact the creator of these clips and that i get my giant dick sucked off by this woman, than be my guest dude.

>>9880215
>i remember the exact thread you are talking about because i fucking made it
nope, that is clearly not the thread I'm talking about
the thread was made by the guy himself, opening up with a brand new webm that was literally created minutes before it was posted
the guy also went on to confirm he was samefagging by actually showing it (but this might have been on a different thread)

>>9880110
kek

(You)

>>9880227
how did you know when the clip was created? also, the OP never fucking talks in the threads. the most ive ever seen is some cryptic shit but i have never seen actual interaction. post proof that this happened or it didnt fucking happen.

you really must be the dude who made up that whole bullshit narrative about where the early clips came from because it seems like now your trying to spin an all new narrative arent you. get a fucking grip dude.

>>9880262
>you really must be the dude who made up that whole bullshit narrative about where the early clips came from
nope, I've never commented on this, but it's probably his own stuff since it's so bad

>>9880262
>post proof that this happened or it didnt fucking happen.
since you're so interested in these clips, I'm sure you can find the thread in the archives, although the archives don't retain thread statistics, he did post a file confirming he was samefagging (you could then try to say he live-edited the page which is rather easy, but together with the thread statistics it was confirmable)

>>9880296
i have no idea what thread youre talking about and i dont know how to search the archives. is every thread even archived? i know of multiple threads of these that i can find via google, but none of them are the thread you speak of.

>>9880296
burden of proof is on you dude, you find it.

>>9880312
I'm trying, from what I can remember the thread was deleted since the guy actually broke the rules and the thread got deleted, should still definitely be in the archives though

>>9880339
id love to see it just for new clips. you could search desuarchive if you have anything to go off of.

>>9880339
also, as I'm going through the archives I'm learning there's someone actually pretending to be ME (same kind of typing form), which is hilarious
maybe that's the original guy as well trying to create more "chaos" around his shit

>>9880356
doesn't help that desuarchive's file server is down (or super slow), but the file I'm talking about is a mixture of his typical speudo-art crap mixed with screenshots (in 4chan's "Tomorrow" theme I think, confirming he was samefagging), seems like he posted it specifically to admit it

>>9880132
Hey, I've got a solution!
Go here: redtube.com
Or here: pornhub.com
Or here: youporn.com
Or here: xhamster.com

And stop whining like a massive faggot! There's so much more "good porn" that you could be watching instead of bitching in this thread. Now go jerk off, take the hint and realize not everyone has the same taste, and kill yourself. In that order or otherwise.

>>9880427
no thanks, I enjoy exposing cancerous faggots like the guy making these

>>9880419
Hmm. Sounds like it could've been just someone making fun of OP though which I have to admit, is pretty hilarious if that's the cawe, and you just interpreted it as the OP doing it. The OP has def made some shitty clips but that one seems extremely out of character. Like it wouldn't make sense at all and totally seems like something a /gif/ troll would do to shit on someone.

well I can't find it right now, maybe I'll look for it later
I really didn't think of saving a blatant admission like that and that I wouldn't be able to find it easily afterwards
washed out colors as usual, bad quality as usual, generic "artsy" stuff, probably started off with the bitch in it, then includes clips with screenshots with a gray theme (most likely "Tomorrow")
the guy certainly won't stop posting this crap so there will be plenty of threads to post about this later (and I will keep posting about it since I know I'm right)

>>9879800
I actually like some of these. Try refining it a little. Make em a bit more subtle. Interesting stuff you got going, don't let these pessimistic redditors tell you what to do.

>>9880110
Good stuff, but this one is the worst.

>>9879800
Can someone explain all these?

>>9880889
theres not much to explain. about a year or two ago a couple of these clips surfaced with no explanation. every couple of weeks a couple more would show up. they would include the text "sensitive" or "colombus, ohio" and more recently stuff like "io 9119" or something. nobody knows anything about them. there was a story going around about their origin early on but it makes absolutely no sense and isnt worth bringing up (it never really made sense to begin with but was more difficult to discredit then).

in almost every one of these threads, this same dude shows up to talk shit because he cant fucking handle it when people enjoy shit that he doesnt. no matter who starts the thread he always accuses the OP of being the creator because the idea that the creator has a single fan is just unimaginable to this person (i see the same thing happen to leeterr too, an extremely popular SFM artist, who is similarly accused of starting and promoting his own threads by seemingly the same person who talks shit in ever single thread where leeterr clips are posted).

i dont what the creator is doing with these fucking clips. it seems like he has a plan, like it is part of project but its been going on for so long and doesnt seem to be going anywhere and its fucking annoying as someone who is genuinely interested in these clips.

>>9881666
>in almost every one of these threads, this same dude shows up to talk shit
I'm assuming you're talking about me
I miss most of these threads, this is probably the fifth one I'm in and judging by the archives the number of threads the guy creates must be at least tenfold
so if it's actually "almost every thread", then there are multiple people noticing the same trend

>>9881721
damn, point me to these threads plz, how are you searching and finding them in the archives?

>>9881788
image MD5 reverse search, standard feature of 4chan x etc.

>>9879860
yeah, let's discourage anyone from posting their OC just for the catalog to get more saturated by the same shit. fat cunt

>>9881666
What you've said seems very similar to the plot of Pattern Recognition by William Gibson.

>>9881804
the "OC" status is completely irrelevant here