Anything goes as long as it's high res
>>10449579
>Requests 'UHD' porn, posts 1080
>Requests porn then
DOESN'T POST THE MINIMUM OF THREE FUCKING IMAGES TO START A THREAD FUCKING FAG!!!!
yeah you might wanna remove that U if you want something that isnt dead on arrival
maybe high bitrate high res
>>10449579
>asks for uhd 4k
>posts 1920x1080p 2.98mb shitty bitrate
great sense of humor fag.
>>10449579
Who is she?
>>10449579
>Error: Image resolution is too large.
4chan doesn't even allow UHD.
>>10451490
Are you fucking blind?
this is now a ≥3.5MB thread
>>10449697
sauce please?
>>10452695
Kendra Lust Riley Reid
Mommy's Girl is the series
Mommy Posing is the title
>>10449579
anything?
>>10451490
liz_103 on reddit
>>10449651
Oh noes.
>>10449579
anyone know sauce for this?
>>10462156
Liz_103
>UHD thread
>no UHD in the thread
no janitors online i guess
>>10457740
No gay shit.
What a fucking joke of a thread
This is always so disappointing.
Just like how I haven't seen an actual 60 fps porn webm in months.
i think the gist of these types of amateurs is that this is the riskiest legal exhibitionism they can do; at any moment they know someone could inform everyone in their life what their secret hobby to make money on the side, and how far they go (vomit! urine! scat!) while being so otherwise outwardly pure
>>10464024
>>10462156
that isnt liz, she watermarks everything and doesnt hide her face. Check scrandle maybe
it's pretty obvious that anyone who is prolific in any sort of amateur porn at all on the internet will be in a database matching faces, social media, and porn, altogether, using free and open source facial recognition. strange times we're all opting in to!
'shame' and 'malicious doxxing' will be a thing of the past, it will be so pervasively linked and available that any illusions of privacy will be long forgotten, being immediately recognized and id'd by face and #uniquerealnametagging. faces and names form a unique hash and digitized media will be in the cloud, transparent
>>10464988
please more!
She was my fav from reddit. Too bad she's not around anymore.
I'm loving kerryberry420 currently
Blatant masturbatory sexual pleasuring acts are already creeping in to women's empowerment, feminism, and unchecked liberal groups as something to be praised, enriched by. Posing naked, posing sexually, leaking your own sex tapes. How wrong is that? How right is it? It feels liberating and emboldening, and the attention is addicting. But what are the repercussions long term?
i could show the clip of her inducing herself to vomit and then playing with it, but that would ruin your image of her
>>10465054
no it wouldn't
>>10465054
>Ruining the image of a woman who shoves animal shaped cocks up her ass
Are you fucking retarded?
>>10465054
just fucking do it already. hopefully it's the one where she does ass to mouth and proceeds to puke on it. so mad I lost this vid somehow.
>>10465054
>>10465088
>>10466821
>>10466838
what a disgusting girl. at least we'll be alive for the era of HD reality shame reaction videos. seeing her reaction when it gets revealed in public what she does in private will be quite a fapworthy moment
>>10466896
many thanks!
do you have the anal scene prior to this moment?
>>10453748
SOURCE
>>10467018
nevermind i got me
https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=1225160551
>>10466985
>>10464953
i really don't think Liz does this for her own gratification.
if she was into it for the exhibition angle you'd think she'd at least be wet in some of her videos.
seriously, try to find a clip where you can find any hint of natural lubrication.
>>10467294
She makin dat moolah
>>10467294
a girl that attractive doesn't degrade herself in this way as a mechanism for making money unless she was in to it.
unless you're saying someone else is blackmailing her in to doing it for money, and if she ever refuses their arrangement, the person promises to notify her parents/family?
>>10468133
>people don't work at McDonald's unless they're really into hamburgers.
a job's a job for a lot of people.
i doubt she is into scat, bestiality, lactation, large insertions and exhibitionism.
that's a wide range if fetishes, chances are they're for money.
>>10468133
it's funny that porn is empowerment, yet prostitution is abuse.
take a twenty year old girl prostituting herself and she can call a 1 800 number to get herself out of that situation.
but a twenty year old doing porn is because she's "into it"
>>10468957
so you do think there is an external locus of control for her here and this isn't her own will. that's the discussion we're having, if she is or isn't.
there's a lot of smiles. so me look really genuine. it's just acting, then? do it for the money, or you're in trouble...
what do you think then anon, why's she doing this?
>>10469269
no one thinks that she's being held at gun point.
they discussion is whether or not she gets off on doing this, or if it's just for money.
Not part of the previous conversation, but I don't think she's being coerced into doing her mostly solo pornography stint. I would guess she prefers this niche to working a 9-5 and gets some pleasure out of it, as well as income. CAPITALISMMMMM