are these the so-called male feminists I keep hearing about?
>>10411982
Yeah, I'd fuck that.
>>10412011
why reply to your own post
>>10411971
....Ya know when I saw the title of this, I didn't know what I expected but now my eyes are on fire
>>10411982
>Tasty butt, son
Wow
>>10411971
Well, female orgasm is better than male one, but fucking shit
>>10412057
I was curious, too. Talk about a revelation.
This is the word used from fascists and nazis people to call the males feminists. So, are nazis masturbating with this videos? I can't with so big irony hahaha
Anyone with any more content ?
>>10411971
I lost it when he started trying to write. Gave me the fucking giggles m8
Why
WHY
>>10411971
what time to be alive
i'm old gregg
i've got a mangina
I never asked for this
I'm confused, were these women at one point and had surgery to look like a man but kept the vagina?
>>10412991
I never asked to be shown how human I was...
>>10413006
Yep.
Surgery and/or hormone treatment.
>>10413006
These are transmen. They have vaginas and respond to pronouns including he and him.
>>10412983
I am so confused... What has this world come to
>>10411978
Fuckin pewdiepie
>>10411971
Holy fucking shit. I never knew where 'mangina' came from. Now I do. I wish I still didn't.
>>10413100
>What has this world come to
Penis in vagina sex?
I used to be the boy-toy for a trans-man like these and her girlfriend. I loved fucking her girlfriend, but the ftm was weird. Too masculine for me to really enjoy it and the scars were a turn off. Her girlfriend was insanely hot and fem though. They were fun to hang out with and fuck with no strings but as with all things like this it had to end and I moved away. This thread makes me miss them.
I'M OLD GREEEEEEGG!
>>10411971
i am so fucking confused...
>>10413176
>a trans-man like these and her girlfriend
you mean his girlfriend
why MTF isnt so effective than this? they really look like men
this fucking board
>>10413226
I had my dick in her vagina. She might have looked like a man but she was still a she as far as I'm concerned.
Interesting thread
>>10413903
"I'm not gay as long as I misgender him."
>>10411971
>>10411978
>>10411982
>>10411988
>>10411996
>>10412966
>>10412983
>beards
>utter lack of muscle tone
>chest scars
I'd rather have a fbb with a haircut
To most neckbeards on this website this is considered less gay than shemales. Pretty fucking retarded if you ask me.
>>10411982
ok i need sauce on the kid.
>>10413006
They're pre-op female transexuals.
More specifically, they're women who have had their breasts surgically removed, plus lots of testosterone, That makes them hairier on the body, deeper voice, more muscle mass, larger clit, and (in some cases) even causes male pattern baldness.
>>10411971
This is gay. Why is this gay shit here? Are you a bunch of faggots?
I love this. Fuck the haters.
And to those asking questions, it's not "pre-op transsexuals." Not everyone who is trans wants to get surgery on their genitalia, and that's okay. Sometimes this is done because it's medically difficult to create a well-functioning penis, and sometimes people keep their vaginas because they don't have a problem with them or they don't see having a penis as being a requirement for being a man. In other words, gender does not equal sex, and sex does not equal gender. If you're going to jerk off to it, at least be educated.
>or they don't see having a penis as being a requirement for being a man.
No, you need an Y chromosome for that.
does this count
>>10417064
delete this
>>10416930
#straightporn
>>10416930
This is straight.
Traps are gay.
>>10416909
Except they're not women.
>>10411971
First time ive felt actually SICK looking at a pornographic image. thanks gif...
>>10417699
>Except they're not women.
Vagina = woman.
Or are you gonna be all SJW and say they're men cuz they want to be "he" when they have cunts between their legs?
Them's just some ugly, hairy bitches in my book.
>>10416989
>> Not everyone who is trans wants to get surgery on their genitalia, and that's okay.
Who said it wasn't "OK"? I certainly don't mind if you don't want to mutilate your genitals. Regardless, these are still "pre-op" (or "non-op")
transexuals. I'm sure there are other terms you could use and that's "OK"
too.
Why does this matter? It matters if you're a consumer of PORN because its a certain visual representation and you have to classify it.
>>10417699
>>Except they're not women.
That's your point of view.
If I believe I'm a goat, run naked through a field, eat grass and wear prosthetic horns, am I a goat?
If not, why not?
I'm a transman. I'm not getting rid of my pussy until A: The phalloplasty surgery is done correctly on enough soldiers that got their bits blown off that it doesn't look like a Muppet reject, and B: I am abso-fucking-lutely sure that I would still have as good as orgasms with my clit as I do now. Testosterone makes it grow and become hypersensitive constantly.
Also I just don't care anymore what people call me or think about it. We exist, and I doubt you've ever been able to pick out a transguy with chest reconstruction and long-term testosterone treatment from any other guy. Our teanswomen counterparts don't have it as easily as us. Our voices and faces change. We grow beards and muscles and then disappear into society.
>>10418139
So far as I am concerned your private parts are between you and whomever else you care to share them with. I certainly don't care one way or the other.
Just don't expect to put them out for public inspection (eg in a porn flick) and not be subject to classification or criticism.
With respect to your second issue, no amount of male genital reconstruction is ever going to exactly replicate FTM re-assignment surgery because the starting anatomy is different and the expectation is different. I also don't think there ever can be a "guarantee" that surgery involving cutting, reorienting, then stitching together genital skin will have zero effect on sexual response.
>>10418386
>not be subject to classification or criticism.
Why? Do you feel better about yourself when you criticize? Do you feel safer when you classify?
>>10418386
>i certainly don't care one way or the other
>but i'm going to judge and criticize you anyway
nice
>>10413185
Underrated
>>10417699
So a transgender man that becomes a woman isn't a woman but still a man, but a transgender woman that becomes a man isn't a woman and is a man?
>>10411971
Who is that getting fucked?
>>10418106
>If I believe I'm a goat, run naked through a field, eat grass and wear prosthetic horns, am I a goat?
No, you're not
>If not, why not?
Because if I kill you and eat you I'd go to jail even if I claimed "well your honor, they said they were a goat"
>>10411971
Didn't think I could still get fully weirded out here. This is something else.
>>10416930
Are you the goddamn sex police?