>

>>315277
It looks like it would appeal to 8-16 year olds.
That's their target market right?

>>315278
why. Everything except batman weirdly large overshadowing brow looks aesthetically pleasing. I like the vibe it's going for. that being said I am 16 so what do I know.

The idea kinda works, but the photo is garbage. Way too bright and cluttered feeling.

The text doesn't work for me but the poster is on point (lighting, shadows, texture, poses, placement of heroes). It reminds me of those realistic comic book hero paintings made by that one popular comic book painter.

>>315293
Text with symbols is just pretensious,
-And maybe you're thinking of Alex Ross?

>>315288
You have to be 18+ to use 4chan, reported.

I find it hilarious how hard they're trying to make Gal look ceremonial in the films and promo material, and how they're failing monumentally every time. Finally kike nepotism came back to bite them in the ass.

>>315312
It looks like she was crying the whole shoot

The photo perfectly encapsulates the style of those iconic covers bit the logos are too big and it just looks like a kitschy shirt you'd find at hot topic

>>315312
>trying to make Gal look ceremonial
literally what did he mean by this

File: 1500753757020.jpg (139KB, 1024x768px)

139KB, 1024x768px

>>315383
They're trying to make her look like not a bad cosplay, and it's proving impossible. She doesn't have the hair, or the facial features, or the acting chops, or anything really. The only reason people are taking her even remotely seriously is because of what could be the biggest shilling campaign in the history of film.

Stop.

Putting.

Things.

Where.

Letters.

Should.

Be.

>>315278
BvS tried to appeal to a more adult/mature audience, but it failed in comparison to the more childish Marvel movies. So DC is hoping they can cash in on that demo by changing a few filters and making promos look more campy.

>>315292
lmao get filtered

>>315278
yes