>open a huge successful design agency's logofolio
>nothing but wordmarks
>>308771
so post a link
>>308772
http://foredesign.co/projects/logos/
>>308775
I'd be pissed if I hired them and spent thousands of dollars only for them to give me fucking text that looks standard as fuck. And not to mention they forgot to capitalize her name
>>308771
Can I be a designer at a design firm now? Here's my portfolio
>>308807
It's entertaining enough
>>308807
I get it, same reason that at&t has all lower case letters, more friendly. But im mean fuck, just wouldn't want to go to a design firm for just that
>>308805
>>308820
lol, yeah it was either between posting that one or the one that I posted. Now looking at it on it's own, rails is far worse than the one I posted
>>308824
its literally just a font thats it.
>>308771
yeah, id stay away from this company OP
>>308826
enter the blue pill
>>308828
Thing about the redpill is you can't go back
>not a paid protestor
>Using a sign designed by a design firm
Yeah, that sign is an oxymoron
>>308775
this website has one of the shittiest uis ive ever seen. you have to scroll so much just to see 2 or 3 things and the homepage has 90% of the space taken up by 4 words plus the pictures disappear when you scroll over them on the homepage
>>308771
>>308829
how does buying a sign imply you're a paid protestor
don't get me wrong it's dumb as fuck, why would you buy a sign, but your logic doesn't connect
also why is PAID so big
that's gonna be the first thing people see
>>308836
Because protesters don't generally buy signs, they make them.
How the fuck do they even get clients to pay for that shit? Who even goes to them? Where do they find these clients? How can they survive with that quality in New York? This is almost Fiverr level.
>>308858
>>308862
Ayyy, nice one. I saved it for later use.
>>308771
Because that's what people want in 2017..
>>308870
MUH MINIMALISMZ
Isn't this trend going great!
>>308826
jesus what an eye roll inducing image.
>>308873
Not really sure why you're blaming minimalism for wordmarks.
>>308889
Oh you're right, those logos are definitely not a product of minimalism. And neither is that website.
itt wannabefags who think swooshy gradient shit is the correct approach all the time forever and think wordmarks are a fad
https://www.shutterstock.com/image-vector/logo-mega-collection-abstract-geometric-business-252982759?src=teysGFiO2wu6X6dUlVOEDg-1-0
protip: wordmark>symbol
>>308807
Definitely worth watching if you're patient enough to get into it. The styling and set design is also so spot-on.
>>308976
>wordmark
>takes up loads of horizontal space
>can't fit in a square
>can't fit in a circle
>can't make an icon/favicon/profile picture
>only recognizable to people familiar with the script it's made in
>legibility problems in very small sizes
>usually boring and unmemorable
>>309047
>he thinks a symbol is more recognizable than a word
>>309071
Everybody thinks that. It's a psychological fact that pictures are easier to remember than words.
What are you doing on /gd/ anyways? It doesn't seem like it's for you.
>>309071
A symbol isn't easier to recognize. It is easy to relate to ideas it is trying to portray. And good ideas is forever.
>>309127
>see symbolic logo
>can't remember name of the brand
>huh what is this
>see wordmark logo
>can't remember name of the brand
>read the fucking name
>>308821
"too much time on your hands" the design project.