Criticism

>>300957
"I" is too long, and there's no visual connection between it and the type.
On top of that, it's right there on the "S" so it doesn't read as a separate letter. It reads as "Survived"

Do it all in white, and move the I to the left some more. Even then you're just polishing a turd pretty much.

>>300958


What further composition errors lead it to be a turd? I appreciate the criticism otherwise, thank you senpai

>>300959

I think it looks fine outside of the I being too long. I don't like the E either, but otherwise this is an interesting/polarizing design.

>>301106

Polarizing in the sense that it has elements that would otherwise be bad or that you think that there's issue in it but it works regardless of them?

Bottom of the U looks oddly straight.

Where the R meets the V, looks a bit wrong.

It also looks like SURVNED

>>301259

Would you say the differences in thicknesses be an issue for the consistency? I'm surprised you had readability issues on the I/V

>>300957
The I and V look a bit like an N

>>300957

my big gripes are the 'I' next to the 'V' and the other 'V' next to that 'I'. Looks cool tho.

>>300957
I think it looks cool, and all the other anons made some good points. I just have one question: have you tried a flat color on the big I? Or a bigger effect, because that white noise/pixels are hard to make out when it's small.

>>300957
>green

>>301249

Definitely polarizing in the sense of it's a weird logo that somehow looks good. Otherwise, hope you fixed the issues everyone pointed out.

>>300957
type looks too edgy. it would be better if you went a different direction with it instead of the same shit everyone else is doing

Just fish the I in a font with top and bottom lines

Just finish the I in a font with top and bottom lines

>>300957
the e looks like badly cropped lines. if you want to go for that style connect the e to the end of the v.