ITT: Logos you like, from companies/products you don't like.

Pretty much any decently made sports logo, because I don't like sports.

File: mcdonalds_416x416.jpg (13KB, 416x416px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 416x416px

This is just a good logo. Though I don't eat fast food anymore.

we've got a pretty neat thread of railroad logos goi/n/g over here
>>>/n/934255

not really a "company I hate," but this is the only logo thread I saw here

File: canada-flag-style-detail.jpg (38KB, 720x365px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 720x365px

Not really a company or something i hate, but I really love the Federal Identity Program thing Canada has.

File: Silhouette.png (7KB, 384x384px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 384x384px

>inb4 angry fanbois rush in to whiteknight for apple

They suck.

>>271391
a fucking leaf

File: Polygon dickheads.png (35KB, 2000x983px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 2000x983px

>>270859

>>271410
Damn it, someone else was faster than me, even on this graveyard board.

>>270871

WHAT!? That logo is terrible how could you like that over kerned uninspired color dependent garbage?

>>271401
say what you will about apple but they make some sexy looking shit. This includes their design philosophy which has had a tremendous impact on marketing and graphic design since.

>>271437
it's true.
and i'm not fucking with anyone here: they essentially invented web 2.0 and web 3.0(if that's what you would call the contemprary device adapting, minamist, infinate scroll webpages.
Sometimes I think people underestimate their impact on web design

>>271401
> inb4 angry fanbois want to look original by hating apple

File: giphy (1).gif (2MB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x180px

>>271459
ITT

>>271437
>>271459
>>271470
It begins.

>>271459
Web 2.0 was the ability for the user to have an impact on a website (comments etc.)

Apple was super late (like, embarrassingly late with their toy UI) to the flat design party and invented none of it.

They still don't have device adapting UIs, that stuff has been happening on the UWP platform on Microsoft's side of the fence for a few years.

Apple has great industrial design but that's it. They're not good at UIs, graphic design or software design.

File: fiji-airways-motif.png (61KB, 1000x600px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1000x600px

>>271576

>>270871

>logo
>posts mspaint text

>>271564

Basically came to say this

All too often I see Apple fans not even exposed to new ideas in technology or UX design until it hits Apple two to five years late, and then they give it all the credit.

My mind was blown when Apple essentially stole the styling of Chrome OS and GNOME with matte bold colors and slight gradients and gave them all the credit...personally, I thought the style was embarrassingly ugly and I'm a fan of Linux. That shit was around in 2006-2008 in FOSS when Apple was still jerking off over glass and water.

>>271437
The only product they make that looks good are iMacs and no one that knows anything about internal hardware would ever use those.

They're good at marketing their product, that's all there is. Apple doesn't make good or very reliable products, they just know how to make people want them.

Also they were lucky that a couple of big animation and design studios in the late 90s and early 00s decided to use Macs because at the time they really were ahead of PCs. That made people stick with them till today.

>>271576
That font looks disgusting