So all my life iv used Gimp. I only use it to shop together silly

File: Justin Beaver.jpg (7MB, 3888x2592px) Image search: [Google]

7MB, 3888x2592px

Just quick badly shopped silly shit.

>>258418
No. Use photoshop

>>258418
I use Gimp for quickly slapping things together and Photoshop for professional work. I honestly prefer the interface of Gimp in most ways but PS is the more powerful and standards-compliant tool. Torrent it though, fuck adobe.

>>258456
Would you say PS has more of a learning curve? With Gimp I picked it up pretty quickly. Would I be able to do the same as what I do with gimp?

>>258483
When i moved to photoshop I found it pretty intimidating.
The learning curve's surprisingly small.

>>258418
this isnt very good bro

>>258696
Il look into it, Photoshop seems like a standard more than an option by now.
>>258765
Its not supposed to be anything professional.
>Just quickly bad shopped silly shit

I used it like 15 years ago once

from my understanding, it doesn't do CMYK/spot channels/duotones therefore it doesn't have any use for print.

It's good when you're doing it for fun on your free time. At work, time is money, and everything you can do with Gimp you can do it 10x times faster on Photoshop.