>most powerful than many pro laptops in the market today >all

>>62479539
Pure cancer.

>techology
Display technology is technology.

That thing has dead pixels at the top of the screen.

>create a powerful processor
>never do anything with it other than take pictures and play on facebook


Nah

>>62479539

>implying you need power to send shit emojis

>>62479585
>>62479606
>implying that you do any productive stuff in your laptop instead of shitposting 24h in 4chan

>>62479539
>most powerful than many pro laptops in the market today
You cannot compare ARM cores to x86 cores and geekbench is a bad benchmark, always has been

>most powerful
>applefag grammar
>all what /g/ cares about is aesthetics
>this coming from the same userbase that never shuts the fuck up about them

>>62479617
Some, not much. That's why I don't spend over $200 on them.

>>62479723
mean't
>most powerful than

>>62479585
It'll come very handy for augmented reality you fuckstain

>>62479744
I actually can not tell if this is baiting or not.
>meant
>more powerful than

>>62481766
The second I was just quoting OP, first is my own retardation from staying up for so long.

So I can run 1000 part assemblies through simulation on it?

For $1000 I hope I could since its more powerful than most laptops right?

>>62479539
I know this is b8 but how does the more powerful than meme even start.
Why do they keep comparing arm to x64? Why do they do it?

>>62479539
>most powerful than many pro laptops in the market today
more*
also
>comparing an ARM CPU to a desktop x86 CPU
>comparing RISC and CISC
fucking kys, you tech illiterate

>>62483371
Now wait just a minute, I'm with you on the whole "don't compare ARM to x86/amd64" concept, but you shouldn't compare them because of their purpose, not because of the ISA. Let's not forget that backwards-compatibility is generally what makes x86/amd64 complex. Many of the more complex procedures in x86/amd64 were so Assembly programmers could write a little less, but this caused redundancy. Because of this redundancy, many compilers don't even use the more complex methods of x86/amd64 chips, instead opting for the basic instructions.

I say all that to say that a RISC ISA doesn't always mean "less powerful than" CISC, it usually means it's not as backwards-compatible (which is one small reason why Android tends to run on a VM, and iOS stops working well with newer updates), or not as redundant, so it takes a little longer. Kinda like how in Lua you can't do

 var += 1 

so you gotta do

 var = var + 1 

. Does that make Lua less powerful? No, it just means it takes a bit more work, if that makes sense.