"Poor Volta" AMD said

>>>/v/

>geekbench

>>62474706
>815mm2 and 15 tflops
Nope.

>top results are all Linux
PAJEETS BTFO

File: NVIDIA-Tesla-V100-Volta-GPU_5.jpg (276KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 2048x1365px

>>62478349

>>62478370
>compute
>opencl
>cuda
>/v/

computer illiterate: the post

>>62478458
It's because the Tesla cards are all run on servers while the others are workstations. Not saying you can't mix and match it the other way around, but you're really not going to see an HPC Windows server nor a workstation with Teslas it can't effectively cool, so by default all Tesla results will be on Linux.

>>62478458
All important software run in Linux server.

>>62478349
Geekbench don't use tensor core,16bit or 64 bit computer, redesign SM make massive fast Volta.

GTX X80 will be 70-100% fast 1080 with over 700 GB/s GDDR 6.

7nm GPU in 2019 Q3
RIP Vega

>>62478384
But all the card use the same bench, the P100 will be faster in another benchmarks??
>>62478408
TFLOPS mean nothing on parper

File: 1505249399932.jpg (115KB, 568x450px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 568x450px

AMD can't blow the GP100 now this, ayyyyyymd

File: muh really really really really really big die.jpg (229KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 2048x1152px

>>62478349
Only $20,000 for meme learning card, buy yours today!

>>62479037
>TFLOPS mean nothing on parper
>TFLOPS mean nothing
>in compute benches
Anyway, why would i buy this overpriced turd thus paying the retarded GPU tax instead of buying DLU or Crest Lake or whatever new meme processor will come forth?

>>62479037
Worst case GV100 double performance GP100 just using %50 more TFlops means Volta begin way more efficient arch over just moar flops.

>>62478703
The only reason Tesla cards are so powerful is the fuckhueg die. Consumer Volta will be 15% faster if you're lucky. Kill yourself, retard.

>>62479089
Fiji is close to 80% more efficient per CU compared to Tahiti, anon.
And it's the SAME node.
Throwing moar ALUs means nothing.
The only good part of meme100 is CUDA9.

>>62478349
>>62478703
>>62479060
>>62479089
The technological ignorance of Nvidiots is just astounding.

>>62479100
>>62479109
>>62479130
>t. AMDfag rage over please volta be bad.

>>62479219
Stop shitposting.
If you want an HPC peenus-weenus measuring contest then Vega20 comes somewhere 2018.

>>62479253
Sure people love programming OpenCL in HPC

>>62479331
They will once AMD actually bothers pushing ROCm instead of assasinating Quadro in CAD or modelling or whatever.

>>62479349
AMD's never going to catch up. Nvidia actually provides developer support for their big partners and even deploys developers to certain partners. They're very proactive and actually want the market, unlike AMD who'd rather push out some half-assed FOSS solution with 0 support. AMD is a company that doesn't want "it". They have no drive.

>>62479100
>Consumer Volta will be 15% faster if you're lucky. Kill yourself, retard.
damn thats straight up delusional

>>62479411
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand that's where you're wrong. Just look at ProRender.
>Nvidia actually provides developer support for their big partners and even deploys developers to certain partners.
So does AMD. But it's mostly VFX or CAD and not usual GPGPU stuff.
>They're very proactive and actually want the market
So does AMD.
P47 is a living example of AMD wanting to capture (and they will) the market.
>some half-assed FOSS solution with 0 support
I wouldn't call ProRender that.
>>62479423
Bigger dies are bigger dies.
There are no ways around it.

>>62479446
Just remove tensor core, 64 bits ALU and GV100 will down less 600mm

>>62479446
And somehow it will only be 15% faster?
Nvidia doesnt even need to release volta to achieve 30% improvement rebrand 1070 AS 2060 and 1080ti as 2080, congratz just made 30% gains.

>>62479491
It still means that 60% margins are dead.
>>62479507
That's what V-series SKUs will be.

>>62479524
and you think this is bad, even though you get more for same amount of $?

>>62479349
>HPC
>ROCm

i have no idea what the people in this thread are talking about

>>62479710
they think ppl who actually use tesla cards actually checks reviews for there performance numbers, these ppl are tech illiterate, and they will get tesla cards, because they always had tesla cards and not some piece of shit amd shitters

>>62479761
you talk like a pajeet

>>62479710
>HPC
High performance computing.
1U-4U racks full of GPUs doing FP64 numbercrunching.
That or HUEG CPU farms doing everything else that is bound by memory capacity.
>ROCm
Radeon Open Compute platforM - AMD's attempt at fixing OpenCL for Radeons, by adding shit OpenCL can't do and writing basic libs (and it's also a vendorlock). Still in it's infancy though. AMD will start throwing money at it probably in a year or so.

>>62479814
does this mean that leenux will have to use ROCm and it will have danker graphics?

>>62479849
No.
It's compute.
And ROCm is meh now.

>>62479871
whats a better card for getting uhhh
free wifi

>>62479814
>ROCm
>platforM
Was there any specific reason to avoid the letter P in that abbreviation?

>>62479960
Dunno ask AMD.
It was originally called Boltzmann initiative.

>>62479973
>Boltzmann initiative
>tfw you try for a cool sciency name but end up with a secret Nazi project instead

>>62480107
>secret Nazi project
And CUDA was Compute Unified Direct Architecture once.

>>62479130
No argument, at least, can you elaborate?

>>62480375
>amdrones
>arguments

kek

>>62480375
See
>>62479074
>>62479100

>>62482187
Kill yourself.

>>62482187
>I sure love overpriced Nvidia gpu's almost as much as I love sucking dick.

The post

I too love 2 wafers 1 die designs.