CPU backdoor

Intel Core 2 Duo Generation 3 are still rather recent and they can be fully un-Intel-ME'd with Libreboot as an example
AMD's old non-botnetted CPUs aren't worth it

File: nagoorcorejava.gif (152KB, 849x458px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 849x458px

#Hillary2016 I'm with her

muh backdoors, no one wants your collection of MLP so dont worry you neckbeard faggot

>>62475433
What if have paranoia and can't sleep knowing my computer could be listening?
What if I'm a criminal?
What if I just mainly have principles and a proclivity for maximun freedom?

>>62475417
8350 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c2d

>>62475475
botnet

>>62475474
well get some pills for that paranoia it can get worse, and if you are a criminal what the fuck are you doing on this chinese basket forum and also unless you are some world infamous criminal i doubt anyone would think to check your PC, and yea maximum freedom for the cost of shit performance

>>62475392
bulldozer if I recall

>>62475474
>What if I'm a criminal?
stop violating the law

>>62475730

Was it proved that although the backdoor existed on bulldozer, it was disabled?

Also, openrisc when?

>>62475417

Since which generation did AMD hop on the botnetted cpu trend?

>>62475392
what is a CPU backdoor anyway? it would be sending data right? But it would have to go through the internet, can't you monitor and/or block that?

>>62475855
I think it comes without PSP
I can't really recall though so you should look it up yourself :^)

>when
never, and eventually all backdoor-free machines will die

>>62475392
has intel released any public statement on the ME fiasco?

>>62475925
It circumvents the cpu, but you could probably block it in your router. However, LE could still use it if they have physical access to your computer and possible use it to extract encryption keys and whatnot.

>>62475925

That assumes that your router is backdoor free.

>>62476090
The authentication bypass or the NSA code?

>>62476093
>>62476097
Fair enough. As I posted I realized it may be able to connect to any random available wifi as well. Can it do that?

>>62476090
They probably aren't allowed to talk about it.

>>62476159
everything related to the ME

>>62476170
Don't kid yourself, they're willing partners

>>62476170
so people ask their PR about the ME and they just reply no comment? isn't that supposed to be world shattering news?

>>62476167
It can be made to run any code that the processor itself can run, so yes.

>>62475511
No.

>>62476192
What do they(or AMD) have to gain from this functionality? I can't imagine they implemented this of their own volition.

>>62476179
Normies don't care about this. Their first reaction is going to be "well, I have nothing to hide. This is for my own safety".

>>62476235
>What do they(or AMD) have to gain from this functionality?
You're assuming Intel higher-ups aren't buddies with the """deep state"""

>>62476278
You're right on that. I just meant this isn't something they would've developed without the instigation/support of the deep state.

Given a free choice, they would instead probably develop things that their marketing team can use, like "more cores".

>>62476235
>botnet is now for your safety
So they enjoy being cucked

>>62475392
AMD Phenom II X6

8350?

>>62475392
I'll give you a list of recent, non-botnetted CPUs:
[]
And yes, this includes mobile CPUs and most other architectures.
/bread

How long until these fucking CIA niggers start injecting LSD into my CPU?

https://puri.sm/products/librem-13/

Obligatory.

"backdoor" at this point is just a byword for getting old and becoming a neo-luddite. you won't accept proof either way because you insist that it's just going to be falsifiable, or that you're just a shill from the company who makes it. you're getting into creationist kind of shit with this and it's all just an excuse to stick to single core shit under the guise that you're being "tracked". When in reality you're just the same as your grandma fighting PCs in the 80s and you're scared to death of all this. About as bad as holding onto dumbphones because they were just from a time before you knew better and you make up that smartphones are for "tracking".

>>62475392
Generally speaking any recent desktop processor has it. Go to the fucking Intel page and look for one without Intel vPro.
Shitty atoms and celerons do not have it, maybe because they didn't even bother.

Seems that for a new rig you have to choose between shitty and botnetted.

>>62477017
https://libreboot.org/faq.html#will-the-purism-laptops-be-supported

>>62477302
>will the ism laptops be supported
>will my autism be supported

>>62475392
https://www.sifive.com/products/hifive1/

>>62477017
>>62477302
so this computer has no tracking chips at all?
not even the intel one?

>>62477006
maybe then they'd be good

>>62475701
>well get some pills for that paranoia it can get wors
S O M A
O
M
A

>>62477572
Did you even read the libreboot article. It does.

>>62477572
It still does, but it's disabled iirc. I believe they have the chip manufactured with certain options turned off. Still not 100% of binary blobs are removed though, as mentioned by:

>>62477302
As the next line says, nothing past 2008 is supported. Shame.

We need to break away from the Intel/AMD duopoly in order to have recent options. New PPC desktops when?

>>62475792
What if the law is not legitimate?

>>62477825
never, since normalfriends want to use proprietary software only available on x86

>>62475392
AMD FX lineup. They didn't have the PSP.

>>62477854
Do you live in a democracy?

>>62477879
Only on paper.

>>62477484

Didn't realize risc chips had hit the market. Seems like the bootloader sources are made public as well. Good shit.

>>62477906
It's RISC-V - even the arch is public.

>>62477856

I'm pretty sure the x86's instruct set is already in the public domain. It's just Intel/AMD's implementation+bootloader that's locked down.

Someone could make an openhardware version of the x86 but since it's going to be geared towards a very niche tech savvy crowd, you may as well start with a cleaner/superior slate. eg. openRISC

>>62477967
>x86's instruct set is already in the public domain
Extensions aren't. Enjoy your no SSE.

>>62477791
so its a piece of shit

when do they release one where there is NO botnet chips=?

>>62477932

RISC-V has a permissive license. I believe vendors can make certain changes and not release it to the public domain.