Browser Extensions

Google Chrome

>>62467331
fpbp

>>62467263
>mpv-youtube-dl-binding
what is this?

>>62467263
>- RES

Firefox Nightly
custom user.js, custom userchrome.css, deleted stuff in """features""" folder, ublock0, umatrix, smarthttps, decentraleyes, cookie autodelete, violentmonkey, stylus, external application button.
Doesn't get comfier than this.

>>62467361
Opens videos in mpv instead of playing them inside your browser.

http://coincidencedetector.com/

>>62467263

Missing Tab Groups.

>>62467263
everything from https://pastebin.com/dinBuXxJ

>- mpv-youtube-dl-binding
Holy cow, anon, that's pretty cool. I've been manually copying YouTube links, and I could have just automated the process this whole time.

uBlock Origin
Decentraleyes
Tampermonkey

I used to be one of those turbo autists with dozens of privacy extensions, but I stopped being retarded.

File: ae28aa0162c5e2fdd0a0f10410655bbe--gentileschi-artemisia-male-portraits.jpg (14KB, 250x357px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 250x357px

>>62467331
>using a (((browser))) without any good extensions

Does anybody else have problems with Netflix when they try to run ESR?

Firefox Aurora
>AdNauseam
>Greasmonkey
>NoScript
>Overbite
>RequestPolicy Continued
>Stylish
>Tile Tabs
>Tree Style Tab

File: ayn-rand.jpg?ref=relatedBox.jpg (27KB, 624x330px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 624x330px

>>62467836
>Using an extension to point out the obvious.

>>62467263
Yeah, real comfy when ESR starts breaking because shit like its media support is a year out of date.

>>62467836
>>62471443
>>>/pol/ or >>>/his/. I don't care. Just leave here.

>>62473390

Firefox ESR will support the current media standards for many years to come, it's not like next month we're gonna find h.266 or something new that it can't handle. Besides, codecs are easy to implement even if it's part of the base code of a browser, get real.

>>62467263
4Chan Media Downloader
4chan Faster Images
Javascript Control

>>62469950
>manually copying
https://gist.github.com/ubone/562d43d59f6ddcc8d 63c228e3ce717e8

>>62467263
>- HTTPSEverywhere

my workplace outsourced their project management site to some guy who ended up giving us some half-finished product

it doesnt use https, and if you try to access it with https in front, it says invalid username/pass

can anyone explain to me why that happens?

>>62473552
You tried watching netflix with it on windows?

>>62467331
>>62467353

>shilling and samefagging at the same time

>>62467263
>RES
Kill yourself, my man.

>half of them are legacy
how do you feel that Mozilla fucks your comfy experience?

>no user script manager
>no user styles
>no reverse image search
how do you even function?

>>62473552
>codecs are easy to implement
Yet they don't

>>62473655
HTTPS isn't just an option you flip on. You have to properly set it up, register the certificates and shit.

>>62474220
I understand that, but isn't that what 'https everywhere' does anyway?

what i was wondering was why trying to force https makes the login not work

I don't know much about this stuff

>>62474280
>isn't that what 'https everywhere' does anyway?
No. https is like a roadway that's fenced in and guarded, with a security gate at either end so only authorized people can get in. https everywhere is a police officer that yells at you every time you try to walk down the normal road next to it.

>>62474323
oh right, so does 'https everywhere' just flat out bar access from sites that don't use ssl or something like that?

>>62474345
It can. Its default behavior is supposed to be to just to turn it on if it is an option, since a lot of sites don't default to it.

>tampermonkey / grease monkey
>a form of adblocker
>4chanx
>and in settings, disable 3rd party cookies & disable javascript
perfecto. If you need custom css / features use tampermonkey to inject it. ez.

>>62473944
Sad, but other browsers are way inferior. I just can't replicate the comfiness.

File: jew.gorhill.firefox-chrome.png (104KB, 1530x800px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1530x800px

>>62475807
> other browsers are just way inferior
This. Pic related. Firefox may have botnet, but they also make it easy to overcome said botnet via extensions, user.js, etc., ... Even jewhill agrees. Just because things are perfect doesn't mean you should put up your hands and say "fuck it" and use a proprietary solution.

>>62475863
>Just because things are perfect
*Aren't perfect

>>62475863
Is there any way to make the history in Firefox as useful as the one in Vivaldi?

>>62475863
chromefags BTFO