>he calls himself an engineer
>he doesn't make engines
I'd just like to interject for a moment. You appear to be using an element from this image in your post: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Richard_Stallman_by_Anders_Brenna_01.jpg
You may have done this accidentally, but you've violated the terms of its copyright license. This is a serious offense and I hope you take it as seriously as it deserves.
Not to say that you're not allowed to create derived works from this image, you are, but this picture is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Norway license. Therefor, you are free:
to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work;
to remix - to adapt the work;
Under the following condition:
attribution - You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
In this case, the attribution requirement is resolved simply by including the following in your post:
Anders Brenna [CC BY 3.0 no (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/no/deed.en)], via Wikimedia Commons
Now that you have read this, I hope you have a better understanding of your rights and obligations when remixing and sharing this work. They will let you edit, now be nice and credit~
Engineering was around long before engines were being made.
>>62465212
Don't tread on me capitalist pig
>>62464924
I do my purfect gaym engine, am I engineer now?
I've had a guy tell me that I'm not a real engineer because I'm not curious about literally everything.
I'm a software "engineer", he works in IT for a school.
Is he right??
>>62467428
>disrespecting the freedoms of the photographers who respect your freedoms
>breaking the law
>>62467866
Yes
>>62464924
>implying I can't make an engine from scratch.
It's simple technology.
Now servicing some ECU tangled car that sits too low to the ground to get under and has components blocking all areas is challenging and I cannot do it.