Welcome to 2015, Apple.

Galaxy s6 isn't water proof

>>62464547
what's the deal with these anti-apple images and the kerning or the font choice or whatever being so fucking awful? do you guys have to read text like this?

> Kapeesh

POO

>>62464573
a pajeet being familiar with android phones from 2015? what a shocker

>>62464573
IN

>>62464658
LOO

>>62464573
>>62464588
>>62464658
It's Italian for 'understand'

t. I live around plenty of pajeets

File: Screen Shot 2017-09-16 at 12.19.59 PM.png (336KB, 1188x1056px) Image search: [Google]

336KB, 1188x1056px

>>62464689
lol okay.

>>62464713
Yeah, because two languages cant share the same word. Google the origin of the word shampoo, or karaoke.

>>62464741
"<3 [name]" is a well known shorthand generally equivalent to "with love from [name]". "Kapeesh" is obviously a name, and it's obviously an indian name.

your defense of the OP image here is bordering on delusional.

File: Screenshot_20170916-122218.png (167KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 1080x1920px

>>62464713
lol okay

>>62464768
>People don't use common slang as online handles
>People making a comment on my unrelated criticizim must be delusionally defending this whole image.

>>62464867
the "<3" is a shorthand. there's not much more to say. that context is important unless you're determined to ignore it to continue to defend your specious argument

>>62464547
>oh look we had it first!

being first doesn't mean best. muh specs mean shit when you wallow in the android,google, touchwiz quagmire.

File: Screenshot_2017-09-16_20-36-14.png (19KB, 306x72px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 306x72px

>>62464547
>16MP 2160p camera
>12MP 2160p camera
??

4k recording at 30fps vs 60fps, and 1080p at 60fps vs 120fps

can't be bothered to look into the specific way the OP was lazy and inaccurate about the other pieces

>>62464928
And yet, whenever there's a "first" for Apple devices, the drones flock to it and call Android a copycat, even when functionality has been improved. What's up with that?

>>62464561
It is, more than the X given it's IP 68 cert.

>>62465019
because android devices haven't made any effort to establish themselves as credibly innovative. anything that seems to have been on apple products first looks derivative

>>62465034
no, the s6 is not ip 68, nor 67. I know this bc I fucking have it

>>62465045
>t. iToddler

Sure thing, kiddo.

>>62465098
are you telling me that you think samsung or LG or HTC have a well established reputation for being innovative?

go give out a survey asking people to name 3 innovative tech companies. i'm willing to bet you'll hear "apple" in the top 3 from everyone.

>>62465098
you showed him

File: Google Pixel comments.png (299KB, 1378x1008px) Image search: [Google]

299KB, 1378x1008px

>not even using the actual iPhone X picture
>specs make the phone
>specs make the experience

Do you retards not understand? Apple isn't in a race with anyone. Android manufacturers are, with each other only. iOS is the only thing that matters. I'd rather use an iPhone 5 than the Galaxy S8, because Android is garbage. Its like you don't even comprehend what technology is, or what its for.

>>62465118
>asking normies about tech
>HURR I DUNNO APPLE I GUESS
What do you expect? But yes, I do actually think that both LG and HTC are innovative. Not with every released phone, but that wasn't the point.
Enjoy your Apple device and keep believing the things you spout. One day you'll grow up and realize what a dumb fanboy you've been.

>>62465121
He showed himself.

>>62465170
i didn't ask if you think they're innovative. i said that they haven't established themselves as credibly innovative. the whole question here is why people look at android advances as derivative and copies of apple products, but not the other way around, and the answer is that people don't think of android manufacturers as innovative.

take a breather and stop acting like a frothing zealot.

>>62465198
>the whole question here is why people look at android advances as derivative and copies of apple products, but not the other way around
The answer is: marketing.
You're welcome.

>>62464689
you mean capisce?
this has to be reverse psychology done by an apple fag to make android users look retarded

>>62465589
>marketing

Why is Apple, who use standard ad agencies able to magically sell and convince people of anything but other companies can't? Do you think Apple are magic? Are you that autistic that you can't admit they make things people like that gain influence?

>>62465780
are you actually denying that apple whole success revolves around its image?

>>62465034
>>62465056
The galaxy s6 has no IP rating officially but it does hold up well against liquid according to water tests. It survived 20 minutes underwater, speaker stopped working but device was still running and able to charge after drying.

>>62465843
>are you actually denying that apple whole success revolves around its image?

Yeah, because it revolves around the PRODUCTS they've been MAKING and SELLING before you were even born you dumb fuck. I asked you to tell me why Apple alone is capable of doing this and you have nothing to say, instead you confirmed my suspicion that you're an autist and cannot comprehend the fact that this 40 year old company actually makes things people want to buy.

>>62465867
>speaker stopped working
There. Not waterproof.
Q. E. D.
t. S5 and then S7 user

>>62465882
first, stay civil
second, I'm not the anon you were talking to
third if you can't see what anyone else can, then you're a retard and I can't (nor want to) help you

>>62465887
Just put your galaxy s6 in a secure ziplock bag, now it's waterproof. Use Bluetooth speaker and blast some porn while you're in the shower.

>>62465882
you're retarded

>>62465882
Haha. Apple is literally all about marketing. Remember when they didn't do good marketing and their sales crashed so they got Steve Jobs back into the business to help them? Yeah. That's what marketing is capable of.

>>62464547
Correct it with the iphone 8 to galaxy S7 and then you'll have it

>>62464547
Apple is a dead meme