What went so wrong for Intel after this processor? This was

>>62464055
lack of competition makes markets stagnate

>>62464066
i want to upgrade from my 4790k to a 7800k or even a coffin lake but there is pretty much no point in doing so

fugg

File: 12444444.png (209KB, 1451x766px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 1451x766px

>>62464055
>>62464148
AMD shills convinced everyone they need more cores.

>>62464055
Fuck me i have a 4790k @ 4.6ghz on all cores im comfy as fuck famalalalalalala

>>62466338
Exactly what I'm posting from right now too with same OC. I have a 4690k @ 4.6 as well. The 2500k I have in use still is 4.4. I might build a threadripper media server. Waiting on AMD second gen to see how it fares. Intel memelake or newer look unattractive. Used laptops/rigs with Haswell chips are nice for the money at the moment.

File: Comb25072017091958.jpg (884KB, 600x4200px) Image search: [Google]

884KB, 600x4200px

>>62465572
This, more cores = 0% performance improvement

1 intel core = 8 AMD cores

>>62464055
Haswell/Devil's Canyon was also the first time you could run VT-d on K parts. I have Manjaro installed on one that plays games just fine with Win10. No need to worry about that botnet mess.

>>62466458
All AMD has to fix for their next line is clockspeed. The 4Ghz wall is real.

File: 1403639928608.png (375KB, 752x588px) Image search: [Google]

375KB, 752x588px

>>62466458
>6950X launched at >$1500
thank you based AMD

File: 1462813600431.png (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x720px

I bought an i7 4790 because I'm afraid of overclocking
still performing perfectly

File: 1376795329725.jpg (212KB, 1083x720px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 1083x720px

>>62466640
I was also afraid of OC'ing but I bought a 4670K regardless.
Finally decided to push it to 4.2GHz a month ago but I got paranoid about the VRMs frying and went back to stock. Apparently my motherboard lacks sensors for it so I can't check temps.

>>62466520
Even if they do I think it's all fucking retarded desu. Their R7s only consume 65W max at 3.2 GHz. I'll take that with a passive cooler over 8 cores at 5 GHz with a noisy/leaky/bulky AIO and a power consumption of 300W.

>>62466473
Your botnet mess is definitely an issue son. Ever heard of intel management engine? No one is safe.

>>62466965
Why can't we have both ?

>>62467397
Because that's not how physics work on silicon based processors. Maybe once we make optical ones though...

File: intel jew.png (45KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 200x200px

>>62465572
>>62464148
>>62466458
>The goyim made me release a mainstream 6 core, fucking antisemites

File: future.png (727KB, 1764x782px) Image search: [Google]

727KB, 1764x782px

>>62467397
>>62467558
we can actually

File: 1493238077294.png (177KB, 500x415px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 500x415px

>>62466640
>>62466698
>when my i7 has been running at a +65% OC for 9 years

buncha fuckin pussies

>>62469164
tfw don't even oc my r5 1600

File: thumbs up.jpg (78KB, 1407x1000px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 1407x1000px

>>62466458
>>62468501
>$0.01 has been deposited in your account
Thank you for your brave shilling Pajeet.

>>62466458
TIHS.

Why aren't y'all running a Celeron G440 yet? It is a single core Sandy Bridge, have Soldered IHS and is INTEL

File: 1495995286323.jpg (826KB, 1002x1480px) Image search: [Google]

826KB, 1002x1480px

>>62469432
Brian, the cores