>COURAGE

> supporting T-Mobile
> third rate carrier
good. they don't deserve the iPhone.

V30 and Pixel 2 appear to be the first two phones that will operate on the 600mhz band.


Kinda weird how the LG V30 with the Qualcomm X16 and the Note8 with the same Qualcomm X16 modem can't connect to the same network.

>>62461381
>(((can't)))

>>62461368
>Tmobile makes weird network, again
>Nobody rushes to support non-standards network
COLOR ME FUCKING SURPRISED!

Applel still a shit though.

T-Mobile won't deploy 600mhz en masse until maybe 2020

Jesus fucking christ. Welp there goes my appetite for the iPhone 8. Samshit 8 it is now.

File: file.png (202KB, 382x400px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 382x400px

>>62461411
I already have it in my city. Sucks to be you lmao.

>>62461420
The S8 and S8+ and Note8 have a modem that technically can support 600mhz but apparently it requires some sort of extra hardware antenna or something because the LG V30 uses the same modem and it work with the 600Mhz Tmobile, but the Samsung phones don't.

>>62461411
Maybe if you weren't a flyover we would care.

I bet you don't even have 1gbps fiber internet either.

>>62461441
dafuq...

source?

I was looking at the V30 but the bootloop thing is making me kinda worry.

>>62461447
Qualcomm confirmed the X16 supports the 600Mhz band ONLY on phones where the manufacturer elected to add support.

So far that's the V30 and the Pixel 2/XL as far as I am aware.

>>62461447
https://bgr.com/2017/08/28/galaxy-note-8-t-mobile-600mhz-support-vs-lg-v30/

>>62461420
>2017
>wants to buy iPhone 6 derivative

>>62461472
>he thinks apple copying the Galaxy S8 with the iPhone X is actually the opposite.

KEK, wew applel fanbois everyonel

Band 71 was only added in march.
Only 1 modem currently 'supports' it and it's flaky (as are all qualcomm modems though)

>>62461420
Samsung won't have support either.
Even though they actually wrote most of the documentation for interoperability on Band 71.

>>62461510
>it's flaky (as are all qualcomm modems though)
This intel shill came out of nowhere

File: 1504906357346.gif (2MB, 460x259px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 460x259px

>>62461368
what did apple mean by this?

>>62461411
>living in a flyover state

File: 1497116422411.jpg (335KB, 1000x875px) Image search: [Google]

335KB, 1000x875px

>>62461594
SUFFERING

>>62461445
>>62461594
Flyover states are the only place 600 mhz even fucking matters

File: IMG_4569.jpg (138KB, 638x804px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 638x804px

>>62461586
IT
JUST
WORKS

>>62461643
Are you retarded?

Sure it's useful for extending range of coverage, but it's ALSO fucking great for building penetration in high population density areas.

File: IMG_4570.jpg (101KB, 635x607px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 635x607px

>>62461649

>>62461643
Low frequency signals curve around the walls. High frequency signal is more linear and focused.

>>62461666
No one needs to download anything at gigabit per second speeds.
sage

File: 1481740804088.jpg (425KB, 800x778px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 800x778px

>>62461706
Guess who's going to be downloading high quality 4K movies and TV shows on their 400GB mSD card? Not you.

>>62461565
>Implying nVidia doesn't make the best SDR
baka.

Intel makes great NIC chips, but outside of that their networking is terrible
- Intel PROWireless - SHIT
- Intel Bluetooth - SHIT
- Intel UMTS/LTE modems - SHIT
- Intel DOCIS moems - SHITTER THAN SHIT.
Even are Altair better.

>>62461622
>that sudden realisation of meme magic

>>62461758
>downloading
>not streaming

>>62461767
Wrong, Intel Wireless AC is great

https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/product-briefs/dual-band-wireless-ac-9260-brief.pdf

>>62461368

Well, that's T-Mobile out of business. Good riddance.

>>62461706
>I'm retarded and main /g/: the post

>>62461816
>Intel Wireless AC is great
>posts link to intel.com
Intel should charge you money for such shitty shilling.

>>62461834
>I don't know shit about wave physics, but I have an opinion: the post

>>62461803
No streaming service currently exists that has high bitrate 4k movies and TV.

Downloading is the only real option.

>T-Mobile
>being so fucking poor you need to use a destitute carrier that incentives preying on old people for profit with shitty retail stores

damn, sorry son.

>>62461735
Speak for yourself, apple shill.

http://www.businessinsider.com/iphone-8-iphone-x-dont-support-new-t-mobile-lte-network-that-cost-8-billion-2017-9/

>No phones technically support the 600MHz spectrum yet

OP IS A FAGGOT

File: 1475236129944.jpg (1MB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1200x1200px

>>62461803
I said HIGH QUALITY not yify quality.

>>62461901
Because the LG V30 isn't out yet TECHNICALLY in the US.

>>62461901
No, you're a faggot.

There are soon to be released phones that support it.

t-mobile is the poor persons carrier anyways, they cant afford a $1000 phone in the first place

>>62461901
DISREGARD THAT, I SUCK COCKS

http://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/lg-s-v30-to-be-first-phone-to-support-t-mobile-s-600-mhz-spectrum

>>62461936
lol

Not using your parents to sign up for this plan:

https://www.t-mobile.com/offers/t-mobile-one-unlimited-55

$30 for unlimited is pretty good deal desu.

>>62461936
This, they could only afford 6 FUCKING BILLION DOLLARS for the 600 MHz spectrum auction.

>>62461862
>projecting: the post

>>62461379
T-Mobile is not a carrier, they are the Un-carrier. For 20 years, T-Mobile has brought the best wireless experience directly to consumers. T-Mobile lives in the now, and right now they are offering the best deals for you and your family. You can unlock Unlimited Everything Plan on 4 lines for 40 dollars a month, or pay as you go. No contract. No bills. No hassle by prepaying for unlimited data and texts for only 30 dollars.
With T-Mobile you can be anywhere with the most advance 4g LTE network in America.

>>62461981
He didn't T-mobile was poor themselves, but that are a carrier for poor people.
Carrying the poor doesn't make you poor, it's actually quite profitable.

>>62462016
>The most advance 4g LTE network in America.
So still shit then?
Let me know when you get real world throughput above 10mbps.

File: yuki.jpg (104KB, 1280x533px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1280x533px

>>62461368

File: Screenshot_2017-09-16-12-34-29(1).jpg (89KB, 344x1143px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 344x1143px

>>62462025
You're talking about tracfone.

pic related is already a ton of money for poors

>Is know as a company which """""push""""" the technology
>Don't want to use new tech

Lol

>>62462076
>Tracphone
They aren't even hiding it...

>>62461982
>not an argument: the post

>>62461410
>again

What was the first one? Are you sure you're not thinking of Sprint?

>>62462097
>new tech
>it's a frequency band only used by a single carrier in a single country that only covers several test markets as of September 2017
alright...

>>62461368
I have proper LTE (the non joke one that has no throughput) already.

Sucks to be an Applel faggit in the US. Wait, no, sucks to be a smarthpone faggit at all in thee US.

>>62462117
Dumbass, Qualcomm modems already support this frequency. The reason iPhones are keked is because they use intel modems.

>>62461872
>so fucking poor
>single line is within 10 bucks of every other carrier

This is the same line of thinking that makes apple shills say things like "poorfag" when referring to anyone with an Android phone, regardless of price. Maybe you should rethink your life.

>>62462040
shilling Verizon advertising
https://opensignal.com/reports/2017/02/usa/state-of-the-mobile-network

Verizon and T-mobile are a draw in speeds. Verizon is for poorfags in Wyoming who think paying for expensive things makes them rich

>>62461379
Nobody deserves an iPhone to be completely honest with you fampai

>>62461368
Wait I have T-Mobile that means I can't upgrade to the 8?

File: 4g.png (88KB, 838x1086px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 838x1086px

>>62462198
Wow you finally managed 14mbps!

File: 2017-09-07 08.31.46.jpg (239KB, 1391x683px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 1391x683px

>>62462292
LTE in the US can be decent if you're not in the middle of nowhere.

>>62462292
>when india is on the list and your country isn't

>>62462335
He knows that, he's just being a baiting retard. There is really no comparison to "muh fast internet euro countries". They have tiny landmasses, tiny populaces, higher taxes (generally), etc.

But once again, he knows this. Just more ebin shitposting :DDD

File: 2017-06-21 14_14_19-.png (6KB, 298x93px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 298x93px

>>62462374
Yeah if you go to the east coast US it's basically like europe.

Fast LTE, and fast fiber home internet assuming you aren't an hour+ from the closest city.

>>62462292
>living in a shit world communist dictatorship

File: 2250887075.png (20KB, 350x200px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 350x200px

>>62462374
I'm Australia, he have a landmass comparable to yours...
This test was taken about 20km out of Tailem Bend - pretty much in the sticks.

>>62462421
Because your countries population density essentially makes wireless options the ONLY option available in the rural areas.


That might be your LTE, but i'd bet dollars to donuts you barely get 20mbps on your home wired connection.

>>62462016
rofl underrated

>>62461834
>shitposting a correct statement
Stay in school, kids.

File: lol geolocation.png (32KB, 300x135px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 300x135px

>>62462456
Nah a bit better than that.
100/40mbps VDSL2 connection, but that's the realworld throughput.

This ISP is garbage and will soon be replaced with AussieBroadband who have a local DC, so the roundtrip times should drop back down to a respectable 5ms (and it's routing to Sydney then back, since that's where MyRepublic's sihit s - for ALL of Australia, fucking dickheads)
Throughput should also go up but VDSL has overhead so I'm probably expecting around ~92/36

File: 2017-08-08 09_02_44-6522213091.png (350×200).png (14KB, 352x202px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 352x202px

>>62462537
That ping is wired? What the fuck is your ISP doing?

File: 1477058955527.png (314KB, 1135x824px) Image search: [Google]

314KB, 1135x824px

>>62462421
I don't think your definition of "in the sticks" is quite the same as ours. Go north by about 200 miles and then take that same speedtest.

>>62462581
Like I said, routing everything half way across the country and back - it's fully retardo and why I'm changing ISPs very soon.
The line itself is NBN, so any ISP will work.

>>62461379
>> supporting T-Mobile
Who should I support then? The Swedish pick pockets? The britbong disappointment factory? The Hungarian turd polishers?
>> third rate carrier
Not in Europe senpai. My service is great and the standards are up to date.

Also Apple is a third grade company now so I don't want it to tarnish my glorious Arian LTE anyway. Q

>>62462601
Yeah, an hour or so from Adelaide ain't exactly the middle of nowhere.

>>62462537
>faster than 95% of AU

yeah, that's fucking disgustingly sad.

In the US you have to get over 200-300mbps to be in the top 5%. In Australia you just need over 50mbps.

>>62462174
>single line
>being single

damn now i really know you use android.