4K TV as Monitor

Because I have a 5k iMac.

Any more questions, pleb?

>>62450029
>small mcdonalds drink
aren't like the large ones only $1?

>>62450068
>27 inch screen

pleb

>>62450073
its a free water, I don't drink soda

>>62450111
>water
homo

>>62450029
Because Im using my 32inch as a monitor

File: sumsong.jpg (211KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 1920x1080px

>>62450029
yeah the new models have very low input lag.
my curved 43 inch samsung is okay enough for shitposting and fallout.

>>62450029
>lose socks
AHHHH MAKE IT STOP I CAN FEEL IT FROM HERE FIX THEM NOW

I'm on a 50" samsung 4k TV right now.

Paired with a 1080ti, gaymen is amazing.

>>62450574
i am also using a 1080 ti on my 4k tv, it is the pinnacle of gaymen

>>62450029
14ms? I want 1ms >:(

File: Capture.png (46KB, 694x645px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 694x645px

>>62450574
>>62450608
fuckin aye!

>/pol/
You have to go back.

>>>/pol/

>>62450073
>Mcdonalds """""""""water"""""""""""

>>62450351
>fallout
play a real game

File: setup1.jpg (960KB, 2420x1815px) Image search: [Google]

960KB, 2420x1815px

Why are you not using 34inch 2k curved monitor with posture supporting office chair in front of a natural light window?

It's like you don't want to be a healthy productive member of society anon.

>>62450029
>implying any of my streaming and cable services broadcast in 4k

>>62450068
>using a mobile graphics card

If you wanted Apple, you should have bought an MBP and a separate monitor.

>>62450689
I actually had a 2k 34 inch ultrawide monitor, sad I fell for that meme, 4k tv is far superior

>>62450683
like what?

>>62450029
I know a faggot named Chase and he is a poorfag with shitty chromebook

>tfw part of the 5k iMac master race

>>62450737
Like almost anything other than those shit buggy games

File: IMG_1699.jpg (56KB, 568x479px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 568x479px

>drudge report
>pol
>windows 10
>those socks

>>62450783
Nice argument, Kevin

>>62450783
i tried to play overwatch but grew tired after an hour

>>62450029
because I enjoy having 60fps, regular hdmi capped at 24fps on 4k tv

>>62450786
>this reaction image

nothing screams homosexual from plebbit like it

>>62450877
WRONG

>>62450934
no its not, hdmi 1.4 bandwith only allows 30hz...

File: IMG_1649.jpg (117KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1280x720px

>>62450883
If you can corelate certain reaction images with r*ddit, I have some news for you.

>>62450877
>not using active display-port to hdmi 2.0 adapter if you have crappy gpu
>not cheating with nvidia gpu and use ycbr 422 encoding to get 4k60 when you dont have hdmi 2.0
>not having a hdmi 2.0 capable gpu.

>>62450946
My TV has HDMI 2.0, as do all new ones

>>62450442
Holy shit I didn't even realize how much I hated this feel until this post

>>62450973
never thought in a million years that shitty TCL tv had 2.0 hdmi

>>62451006
It also has HDR and full array local dimming

>>62450029
>alse, my TCL 605 has only 14 ms of input lag, not noticeable at all.
>14ms
>not noticeable at all

wew.

When I was in-between apartments I crashed with my parents for a month and didnt want to bother unpacking my whole battlestation so I just used my desktop and my 4k TV and wow that was a learning experience.

Never under appreciate your monitor

>>62450632
the minimum absolute lag I have ever seen in a monitor was 7ms, there are no 1ms monitors.

>>62451063
The best monitors have 10 ms input lag

>>62451033
Are you able to show a review of this monitor?
I want to know things like static contrast ratio, light bleeding, viewing angles, and absolute lag... for around 600$ on a monitor size I want I am willing to put down money on it, but I have to know its not going to fuck me doing so.

>>62451063
what you were looking at is a tv where you can not turn any of the post settings off, funny enough the shittier the tv and less features they have, the better they become as monitors.

>>62450689
why that keyboard bro ?

>>62451063
yea it's just not the same, the response time is noticeable I used to think my hdtv was fast until I got an actual 4k monitor...not even close

>not wearing /g/ approved programming socks

Are there any good 4k HDR monitors yet? Or will I have to use a TV like OP

>>62450689
>LG
>not Dell

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/dell-u3415w-34-inch-ultra-wide-curved-monitor,4186-7.html

>>62450712
The big issue for me was PPI.

An UWQHD (3440x1440) monitor at 34" has 110 PPI, which is readable for OSes/apps with poor DPI scaling (e.g. Windows). But for 4k monitors, there's this big gap between 32" and 40" that 4k monitor manufacturers rarely produce in. 32" 4k is ridiculously small (138 PPI), while 40" 4k is good (110 PPI). But with 40" 4k you run into a separate issue involving the height of the screen.

It's easy for the head/spine to swivel left-to-right, but nodding it up-and-down repeatedly is strenuous. A 34" UWQHD screen is 13" high, which is tolerable if you're not sitting right up to the desk. But a 40" 4k screen is 20" high, which is enormous. For perspective, I have a 1080p TV which is 20" high, and I have to be several feet back from it to be comfortable viewing it (as a caveat, I have glasses).

If I can ensure that all the OSes on a system have good DPI scaling, then a 4k with higher PPI is a no-brainer. Otherwise though I'd rather go ultra-wide.

>14ms
>not noticable

I bet you play all your games in locked 30fps because theres no difference between 60 and 30.

>>62451103
Look at the rtings review

>>62450029
>He wears socks too big for his feet

>>62451556
>he thinks input lag is the same as response time

>>62450029
My laptop already has a 4k screen and it's the only computer I actually use nowadays

>>62450029
I'm short sighted and prefer not to need to wear my glasses when using a computer (mostly because they combine awkwardly with circumaural headphones).

>>62450029
man, in that pic you really look like you have landwhale tier tubby ankles, or at least disproportionately tiny feet.

that said, I was one of the early adopter of 40"+ HDMI 2.0 TV as monitor a few years ago, but moved to a proper 43" IPS monitor more recently, mostly for minor conveniences like DP ports, better positioned headphone jack, etc.

will probably upgrade again after proper UHD@120 40"+ monitors come out.

>>62452198
>I have tubby ankles

WRONG

>>62452198
By then Tv's with HDMI 2.1 and 4k 120 tv's will be out

>>62452232
Which matters very little until GPUs with HDMI 2.1 come out (not holding my fucking breath this time remembering DP 1.3 and HDMI 2.0 delays).

I would expect Philips, LG, and Dell to have 43" UHD@120Hz over DP 1.2 monitors next summer. Philips in particular has been good the last few year with adding meaningful improvements ever new year model.

>>62452320

yes but they will have trash contrast ratio and not be HDR

>>62451138
That's the Apple keyboard.

>>62450029
I'm 90% sure my laptop would melt trying to power a 4k display of any kind

File: pantera.png (141KB, 1647x1097px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 1647x1097px

>>62450029
i only use it for streaming f1.

File: IMG_1693.jpg (738KB, 740x987px) Image search: [Google]

738KB, 740x987px

>>62450029
>imblying

op i can see the white glow around the text in tour image dont piss on my head and call it rain

>>62455775
Jesus fucking christ did you spend all your savings on a 4k TV?

>>62455882
are you mocking my minimalist furnishings or the roached iphone camera?

actually the TV was a floor demo model.. its sold as a 4k UHD but its more like Upsampled if that makes sense? it was under $250 SHARP Aquos..

>>62450029
>14ms input lag, not noticable at all
yeah, if you're playing solitaire

>>62455921
no him but a board on a plastic container is not minimalist its destitute stop giving minimalism a bad name you lazy cunt

>>62455945
the best monitors are 10ms

>>62455970
the best monitors are 1ms you jackass

>>62450111
>free water
pleb

>>62455947
hey that board cost like $20@ Home Depot.. and that bucket... classic Walmart.. I am trying to move, painted my condo and have left everything packed up.

I'm nearsighted, so.

>>62456004
that is response time not input lag

learn the difference

>>62450689
>2k
2k what?
The price, the weight in grams?
2k nits?
2k lumens?

>>62451138
Not them but I have one of those keyboards.

Its great because the wide keys, short travel, responsiveness, and low profile make it really nice to type on.

Also looks nice

My only issue is that the control key and function key are swapped which leads to typos when switching to other keyboards, like the near identical, but logitech one I use at work

But I am using a 43" 4K pc monitor instead.

I've become such a screen real estate size slut I'm considering getting a 27" portait on each side.

Please send help.

>>62457080
This is your future.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Toft6fMvByA