Client Encypted Data Hosting

>>62444239
It is very, very good, Anon... (You) just keep using it!

>>62444239
>file level encryption
Insecure PoS. Even with file size and name odfuscation.
>cryptomator+nextcloud
What's the point of nextcloud? Its functionality will be broken anyway. Just use sftp or syncthing.

>>62444787

>Insecure PoS. Even with file size and name odfuscation.

How so bro?

>>62444239
>Java
it's only slightly less worse than crypto performed with javascript directly in the browser
>>62444858
Differential analysis, that's also the reason why encfs makes sense only in a threat model where an adversary party has access your encrypted data only once

You want a hosting capable of delta uploads and you don't want a per-file encryption. You'll create a container and your delta-capable provider will sync only changed bits, without reference to files, names, size and whatnot.

>>62445013
>less worse
*better
>has access your encrypted
*has access to your encrypted

>>62445013

Rsync would work for syncing only changed bytes of data. There's another software as well, that's supposed to be better than rsync in terms of speed, can't remember.

>>62445013

Safer as it may be, delta sync would require you to download/have the entire file locally. Not always possible in many use cases.

Considering the general risk of uploading anything online, no matter the encryption, client side encrypted data would at least make it difficult for the authorities/hosting provider to casually snoop through your data.

>>62445228
>rsync
yeah, not something really integrated in a cross-platform dropbox-alike solution but it werks
borgbackup works too, it should have a WebGUI albeit I never tried it
nextcloud discussed delta syncs in a distant past but I lost track of it, a quick qwant brings me
https://help.nextcloud.com/t/delta-sync-within-desktop-apps/273/12
https://github.com/nextcloud/server/issues/417
> opened this Issue on 15 Jul 2016
>status: open
so I assume it's not implemented yet

File: anime website.webm (3MB, 240x320px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 240x320px

>>62444239
if you have no physical apprehension on you're data, your compromised already

>if you have no physical apprehension on you're data, your compromised already

whatthefuckamireading.png

Is there a list of de-googling software that can be self hosted and E2E encrypted?

eg:
Chat: XMPP Server + Omemo
Voice: Mumble
Video Chat: ??
Email/Calendar: ??
etc?

File: A R Y A N U.jpg (180KB, 1132x671px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 1132x671px

>>62446418
It literally apprehended you're almonds, did not did it?

>>62446828
Consider this:
https://prism-break.org/en/categories/servers/
https://www.privacytools.io/
http://droid-break.info/
https://thatoneprivacysite.net/choosing-an-email-service/

to be more specific you have
>omemo
moar liek omeme rite
jk jk its nice to have, is it
PFS is forgotten sometimes in current era

>>62444239
Cryptomator and Boxcryptor are the only ones I'm aware of that offer this kind of functionality. At least at this level of ease of use anyways.

>>62444239
>seafile
>developed in china
>trustworthy

>>62447879
GPLv3, and you're an idiot.

>>62447879

t. texas faggot

>>62444239
Just us tahoe-lafs

>>62449025
>Just