i want a clear answer with proof to this question. is TailsOS

>>62428447
how to proof the absence of malicious code in the whole of an os in a /g/ thread?

>>62428447
Yes it uses systemD and non free software

Use 'heads linux' instead

>>62428466
>Use 'heads linux' instead
holy shit this is basically tails without the systemdick

nice
thanks anon

>>62428458
how to prove that tailsOS has backdoor as some people claim, you idiot.

>>62428447
Nobody has proof of it.

But the fact that the US goverment lets it live is a dead giveaway. Remeber what happened to TrueCrypt?

If tails was good it would meet the same fate

>>62428447
systemd is a backdoor

>>62428528
what happened to truecrypt? i know it's been discontinued but not sure why.

>>62428447
who knows

>>62428558
The developers just mysteriously stopped and bid farewell without any reason to do so.

It came out of nowhere. Without any explanation.
They were probably bribed/ransomed by some goverment funded induviduals.

>>62428558
Government gag order and assassination threats.

>>62428558
(((They))) couldn't find a way to backdoor it or efficiently break it. Then the devs disappeared, they're either bribed, threatened or dead. Then someone released a backdoored and closed source version before killing it off, and then the "official" site recommended using a proprietary, backdoored alternative.

>>62428447
Isn't it open source? Go find out yourself.

It's made by liberals, so maybe.

>>62428645
>>62428627
>>62428599
so should i use an older of truecrypt instead of LUKS or veracrypt?