Search Engines

File: 80d23ebbba093376b5347a7121c21f83.jpg (85KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 640x640px

Bing for sure... it's heaps awesome...

File: 17626504_810262359132322_6317283814934702998_n.jpg (50KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 600x450px

DuckDuckGo currently. I know I'll get hate for it, but it's the only one that keeps up with Google well. ;-;

>>62406729
DDG = google tier shit that censor results.
Try searx, qwant or startpage.

>>62406729
DuckDuckGo

ignore autists who suggest slow shitty search engines with single digit users like searx and startpage

>>62406797
how does DDG censor results?

citation needed

>>62406797
>DDG = google tier shit that censor results.
What proof do you have to back up this claim? I'm genuinely curious.

>qwant
Are you aware of the fact that qwant uses the Bing ad network to advertise to its users?

>>62406814
duck duck go is owned by a kike, if youre trying to hide from google thats a stupid option

>>62406814
what's wrong with startpage??

it's the perfect search engine

>google results
>no tracking

>>62406797
>DDG = google tier shit that censor results.
Well that's a boldface lie. There are valid criticisms for as to why you shouldn't use DDG, but that isn't one of them. And you make everyone else who does have genuine reservations towards DDG look like they're conspiratorial nuts/contrarians, because you're spewing shit out of your ass. So thanks for that.

DDG (onion+nojs version) because it gives good relevant results
startpage for autism score

File: 1502817753267.jpg (43KB, 630x630px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 630x630px

DuckDuckGo master race. You're not gonna find anything much better unless you conform to the Google Botnet.