>knock someone unconscious and use their face to unlock their phone
>NSA uses accurate reconstruction of their face to unlock their phone
No fucking thanks.
>unconscious
It probably scans the iris too, so that wouldn't work.
>>62401604
>open eyelids while they are unconscious
>>62401608
Then it might work, but how would you do that?
ah yes, the fingerprint scanner certainly requires the user to be conscious
>>62401608
>>62401572
if someone's going to knock you out, they could just grab your hand and use your thumb to unlock your phone with fingerprint sensor.
you guys are asking all of these questions like you haven't been living with these issues for the past several years. are you all retarded? do you honestly think this introduces these new issues?
>>62401672
>fingerprint sensor
I'm against this as well and none of my phones have ever had this feature.
>>62401672
Yes, biometric in general has always been a terribly insecure authentication scheme from the get-go, what else is new
>>62401630
Toothpicks