It's OK when Apple does it

>>62378275
The phone's screen looks broken

>>62378283
>t. Mr. Poor.

OK seriously there's no fucking way that's the design they're going with

They've gotta be shitting people with that, they've probably got some Xiaomi Mix styled bezel phone hidden as a "One more thing"

>>62378369
tell ya what, this will be the fucking design they uncover for the X and all apple shills will claim it as the greatest shit ever made.

>>62378275
Where does the Bluetooth icon go?

>>62378404
>all apple shills will claim it as the greatest shit ever made.
Ans all the Android ahills will bag it, sight unseen.
Until it's copied (badly), of course.

File: galaxys8plus_black_all.png (295KB, 600x674px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 600x674px

>>62378485
>until its copied

Oh yeah, because NOOO android phone did the bezeless design before.

The only one copying here is apple you fucking shill.

>>62378511
It's not like Samsung produces the display for apple and knew the iPhone X would look like this since probably more than a year ago. Also the S8 is a piece of shit.

File: Minami_Shimada_White_Clothes_Moe_Red_Hair.png (131KB, 426x572px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 426x572px

OH SHIT! THE APPLE EVENT IS TODAY GUYS!!

File: ph-1 ocean depths.jpg (2MB, 3840x3507px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x3507px

>>62378624
Oh look, another Android brand that did bezel less before apple.

>>62378644
>bezel less
Yeah, sure thing, Andy.
It is absolutely, completely, fully bezel less...

File: LOLMACFAG.jpg (308KB, 716x898px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 716x898px

>>62378310
Fuck off with that shitty meme, kiddo
>Pic related. It's you, larping as someone who is rich

>>62378511
>has two bezels
>bezeless

>>62378644
>still has two bezels
not beveless.
Even iPhone isn't though, it's got a single bezel.

Apple first to single bezel, prove me wrong.

>>62378734
Okay, mi mix 2

>>62378896
>announced less than 24h ago
>will not be available in US
Apple first to single bezel.

>>62378937
Sorry meant the mi mix 1

>>62378937
>single bezel
the iphone 8 looks pretty bezelled, desu
more like little bezels and a flap

>>62378283
lol okay

is anyone else really excited to see /g/ have a day-long cascading conniption fit in like 8-9 hours?

>>62379133
I'm eagerly awaiting it.
Also waiting the stream for the event - I want to see this fucking expensive building.

File: 1275572947162.png (146KB, 1009x600px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 1009x600px

>>62379133
this phone is going to cause an exodus of users from the apple ecosystem. normies are going to realize Apple is not the same as it used to be and not like the design and removing of features.

>>62379192
/g/ says this literally every year. go write a post predicting it and associate your name with it. if you're confident you're right, you'll get the credit of calling it. but people claim that this is the year apple customers lose faith and leave en masse, and it never happens.

File: haha.jpg (31KB, 321x390px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 321x390px

>>62378679
>bang bang iphone gang

File: averagemacfag.jpg (45KB, 604x438px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 604x438px

>>62379219
its true, a trickle has been leaving apple shit for android. this is going to cause a torrent.

>>62379248
so it won't be an exodus, but more of a trickle?

go write a post predicting that, then. i'm sure the page views will really trickle in.

File: 1493292121844.jpg (54KB, 620x465px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 620x465px

>>62378679
>bangbangiphonegang
Tbh i'd rather be asociated with Pajeets

File: apple walled garden.jpg (65KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 600x600px

>>62379289
I said torrent not trickle. lern2read.. are you an seo faggot thats obsessed with page views or something? I don't even have a blog that farms ads. I don't give a shit about apple I just feel bad for the idiots that fall for the memes

>>62379339
i'm just saying go make your claim in a venue that's not anonymous by default.

making an outrageous claim like that this is going to be the watershed moment for apple is easy when you can slink back into the dark for another year to make the same stupid prediction again next year without anyone being able to call you out for being a cassandra.

>>62379378
k..
https://twitter.com/scattass/status/907538396297515008

why do you think this changes anything where the prediction comes from?

>>62378275

I assume you're memeing. That phone looks great.

>>62379429
posting from an account that has no value is kind of meaningless, but i guess if that's all you have access to it'll do.

what are your criteria for evaluation? when can we call it a day and either say that you were right or wrong? presumably a day's not long enough, but i'm not interested in revisiting your twitter profile in 10 years, so pick a reasonable timeframe. also, what information are you suggesting we look at? what evidence can we both probably agree is proof positive or negative that people "jumped from the apple ship more so than they already are"?

i'm deliberately giving you first claim for these, but if you say something retarded like "if i don't see as many iphones when i'm out and about in 2 months, then it means i was right", then it'd just mean that you're not confident enough in your own claim to use a defensible method to evaluate it.

>>62379607
3 years apple will lose at least 20 percent smartphone market share

File: Screen Shot 2017-09-12 at 3.08.11 AM.png (85KB, 1344x664px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 1344x664px

>>62379680
reply to your tweet with those parameters so we don't lose track of it. if i see the event in 3 years and it piques my interest, we'll follow up.

>>62379710
k...like my tweet so I can gloat in case I'm right and you hide and or will be a homeless ifaggot.

>>62379741
you don't seem to get the whole point of this. if you're right, in 3 years you can lord it over everyone for fucking ever.

File: Screen Shot 2017-09-12 at 3.27.20 AM.png (201KB, 1988x704px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 1988x704px

>>62379741
and yes, don't worry, i will be pretty thoroughly fucked if you're right.

>>62379192
Do normies hate the design? I think it looks breddy cool.

>>62379922
not him, but it's hard to say because generally the internet reflects the shouting of zealots on all sides (not just in this case, but in general).

there's no forum for people who are consistently pretty muted in their feelings about stuff. only forums for android fanatics and mac cum guzzlers and whatnot

>>62378679
"Ain't shit"

So... They're good then