ITT: Compress this image

File: rose.png (3KB, 64x77px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 64x77px

>>62364060

>>62364076
Compression is technology
bump

File: 1505126569624.jpg (57KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 810x978px

do I win anything?

>>62364060
>creates compression thread
>original image already has PNG artifacting

File: 1505126569624.png (1KB, 15x18px) Image search: [Google]

1KB, 15x18px

I win

File: asqueroso.png (135KB, 288x415px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 288x415px

>>62364090
>>62364365
when will resolutlets learn?

File: 1505126569624.jpg (90KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 810x978px

maek jpg because photo, then imageoptim@70%

File: IMG_1599.jpg (100KB, 713x1128px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 713x1128px

Do not compress images, they become unbearable to look at after spanning multiple years through hundreds of computers.

File: _IMG_000000_000000.jpg (29KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 810x978px

Fuck

File: 1505126569624.jpg (46KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 810x978px

>>62365218
another one

File: i_am_winner.gif (21KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 810x978px

Wrote a new compression algorithm just for you

File: 1505126569624.jpg (14KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 810x978px

>>62364060

>>62365266
You're right. It's because of rotational velocidensity, isn't it? That's why lossless is the best.

File: result.jpg (8KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 810x978px

convert -strip -interlace Plane -gaussian-blur 0.05 -quality 1% 1505126569624.png result.jpg

>>62365627
genius

File: le fake webp.webm (80KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 810x978px

>>62364060
it's difficult to present results given 4chan limitations. Any and all jpegs would be parsed through mozjpeg's "jpegtran -revert" effectively losing any optimization in size. webp are not allowed. flif are not allowed. bpg are not allowed. you name it, it's not allowed.
anyway. have this 1-frame webm.

File: rosecompressed.jpg (81KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 810x978px

spruced it up a bit

File: it's 1987 again.png (54KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 810x978px

colours ..... checked
contours .... checked

File: Untitled.jpg (4KB, 51x62px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 51x62px

>>62364060

fuck this is hard

File: 1997.png (78KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 810x978px

>>62368185

File: le rose.png (234KB, 943x611px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 943x611px

>>62364060
https://files.catbox.moe/r2lgq6.opus

what do I win?

>>62365905
you win. 8kb, all that detail, you cannot beat this.

File: out.jpg (37KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 810x978px

I win faggots, best quality for size

>>62368532
too much quality

>>62368554
there are no indications about quality and size in OP. If we literally only care about colour and contours, a dumbed down version of >>62365627
is fine too.

>>62368588
just take it further. im impressed with the cleanliness of your compression.

File: r.jpg (5KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 810x978px

>>62368529
it ain't even that good.
Pic related is 4,8 KiB before uploading. It will get bloated up to 15 KiB because of >>62368011

File: out.jpg (93KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 810x978px

>>62368463

converted to .jpg, lowered quality a bit

>>62368644
you lost the fold in the center of the flower. your first was the sweet spot

File: 1373784412083.png (6KB, 203x195px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 203x195px

What if you traced it as line art, colored it flat and saved it as .png?

File: smallfry-qualitymax1.jpg (5KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 810x978px

>>62368700
the "first one" was not mine. this is with the smallfry algo. It weights 4931 bytes ( 4.8 KiB ) before uploading, and has the central blurry fold you like.

File: smallfry-qualitymax2.jpg (6KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 810x978px

>>62368852
-qmax=2... 5983 bytes ( 5.8 KiB )

File: smallfry-qualitymax3.jpg (7KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 810x978px

>>62368885
-qmax=3... 7335 bytes ( 7.16 KiB )

File: smallfry-qualitymax4.jpg (9KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 810x978px

>>62368912
-qmax=4... 8721 bytes ( 8.51 KiB )

File: temp.png (10KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 810x978px

my attempt

File: le vp8.webm (10KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 810x978px

>>62368938
...and webm

File: Untitled-1.jpg (21KB, 1498x445px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 1498x445px

>>62369173
Might be 10kb but it takes forever to load.

>>62369210
It works instantly on my machine®

>>62369210
this
http://a.webpurr.com/dQAL.webp
should work if you're using botnet browser

File: comp.jpg (1MB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 810x978px

perfect

>>62369646
mirin' all those details

File: 1502151472177.png (30KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 810x978px

why did I spend time doing this

File: autismo.png (16KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 810x978px

>>62369755
>why did I spend time doing this
because you're escaping from reality doing trivial tasks on the interwebs.
excellent work. But you missed the chance to halve the size of that png without further loss in quality.

>>62369534
Most of 4chan is mobile. Paste the image properties instead.

>>62370075
>Most of 4chan is cancer
I know, I know.
>Paste the image properties instead
mobile or desktop is irrelevant. It's almost exactly the same of the 1-frame webm.

>>62369173
magic.

is webm vector based?

File: granautismo.png (17KB, 810x978px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 810x978px

>>62369810
I just noticed that >>62369755
was edited in paint.net 4.0.17 in sRGB with intent=perceptual and this leads to a slightly different colourspace extra chunks are removed and the images are opened in browsers. Something like pic related would match the original colourspace better in this case.

>>62370360
>different colourspace extra chunks
*different colourspace if extra chunks
>>62370344
just vp8, motion vectors as described in RFC 6386 should be irrelevant for still images

File: 1504605063530.jpg (30KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 600x450px

So...gardenfag here..does OP know the rose he's wishing to compress? I'd smite the hell out of my neighbor Mr. Fancy Exotic Bloom-pants with that shit...

>>62370448
is this a new AI?
Hi, Siri
You're drunk again, Siri

>>62370448
Op here. Sadly he does not. Sorry.