is it botnet?

If something isn't open source it's botnet and if it's open source it's probably botnet anyway

>>62350125

>developers

Found your problem right there, m8.

Docker used to be open source, which is why developers used to push it. The open source version of modern Docker is called Moby.
https://mobyproject.org/#moby-and-docker

>>62350186
>Moby is NOT recommended for the following use cases:
>Application developers looking for an easy way to run their applications in containers. We recommend Docker CE instead.

>>62350125
Yeah. sure it is. But you need it in order to not spend hours on end dicking with java, ruby, nodejs errors and palletize server configurations.

We want to make the OS and app separate, and unfortunately, that is not doable without making images that guarantee a working environment on call.

so is rkt a viable alternative yet?

>>62350125
is docker better than lxc

>>62350125

Le blue whale got thousand of articles in a few months

OY VEY AREN'T YOU ON THE DOCKER BANDWAGON ??

>>62350125
I hate how more projects on github are pushing docker files as the default method of installation their shit.

I assume they're tired of dealing with people not figuring our dependencies.

It's terrible though.

>>62350143
>isn't open source
You can't check the code.
>open source it's probably botnet
Just check the code ;)

>>62350498
appimages my pajeet

dont get me wrong it's an awful and bad idea in general but it's got some good use cases for retardedly done software to work right. Case in point Cura