Will C++ ever be able to implement modules?

Yes, it's currently in progress.

>>62344518
Will OP ever be able to define his buzzwords and answer why the current solutions is not modules?

>>62345673
Learn English first

literally what the fuck is a module dumbass?

File: 1502726916048.jpg (10KB, 214x235px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 214x235px

You can animepost about C++ till the cows come home faggot.

But in all seriousness, should I just kill myself?

Why are you eating my ass? Are you a faggot or something?

>>62345687
why the current solution*

>>62344518
2020 will be the year of the C++ Module.
Or 2023. Or 2026. Or 2029.^

>>62345688
>What is google

Already at msvc, clang too I think

>>62345717
>But in all seriousness, should I just kill myself?
Can't I get a professionals (or at least an enthusiats) opinion already?

>>62344518
They already have modules, what are you talking about?

>>62345769
What is in your mind needed for "support" modules in a way you will accept it?

File: giraffe.jpg (123KB, 798x770px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 798x770px

Bleeding-edge features like these take time OP.

>>62345657
Right on schedule for C++20

>>62345847
About this you uneducated fuckwit
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/p0142r0.pdf

>>62345847
It's not part of the standard yet and the implementations are compiler-specific.

>>62345990
so?
Just use cmake, it works cross platform.

>>62345976
Kek with that pic

>>62345990
The standard only tells how it should work, it doesn't tell what the implementation is.
Modules and libraries is a compiler problem, so obviously, you need to use a build tool that supports it.
We use ROS at work and their module system is decent because it is so easy to use.
The overhead you need in their "catkin" system is a package.xml which lists the dependencies and then you need to source a workspace to let the system find the modules.
It is a decent system, but it is more of less linux only.
A better solution is to make your own findCmake files, but who has time for that?

>>62346005
Are you being retarded?

>>62346335
no.
Cmake has support for modules, this is not some new thing.
I assume what you mean is support for creating modules, but anyone who knows c++ and cmake knows how to do that.

>>62344518
Because what C++ needs is an even more complicated compilation model.