Now I wonder would the culprits be to do such a thing?
Angry feminists?
Dr Nick Patterson spoke out this week revealing that robots could eventually turn on their owners – but not by developing their own minds.
No, the lecturer said the dolls could prove to be dangerous if hackers manage to get into their heads, something that would likely be pretty straight forward compared to taking over computers or mobiles.
http://metro.co.uk/2017/09/09/sex-robots-could-kill-you-if-they-are-hacked-expert-warns-6915172/
>>62338569
>Sex robots could kill degenerates and pedophiles if they are hacked
I see no problem here.
ill take those chances
>>62338569
so don't connect them to the internet?
>>62338605
But how else would you be able to fuck the botnet?
>>62338594
And who are these 'degenerates?'
>>62338631
damn pedos and their sex dolls
look at this child, a grown man will fuck it
ban sexbots
>>62338569
This is a good reason to support microkernel security research. Make sure your bot's network stack, its high-level behavioral programming, and low-level firmware are properly isolated. Once that is in place, hard-code several stopping heuristic and a safeword into the low-level programming that shut down the robot.
>>62338597
You can tell because the subsurface scatter is wrong for human skin.
>>62338569
>fucked to death
But what a way to die..
Ghost in the shell was a mistake.
>>62338643
>melons as big as her fucking head
>child
I know that advances in medicine and diet over the last few decades have them starting earlier these days, but damn.
Stepford wifes turned terminators
>>62338685
Also the fingers are fucked up
>>62338569
>having a SmartTM Waifubot
Just get the manual plug one
>>62338569
So now I have to wait for a non bot-netted sex doll before I can safely have sex with a robot?
Who would make better foss bots, linus or the openBSD devs?
>>62338704
How am I supposed to stick my dick through that grate?
>>62338569
Why the fuck would you connect a sex to internet? The only good reason to do so is to install an update, and updates should be encrypted and cryptographically signed. I don't want some dumb startup monitoring my usage habits, and I don't need a web dashboard or an app to control something that should be voice controlled.
>>62338569
>tfw she'll need her inoculations before ejaculation
Curious if a sex bot could be hacked where the pussy closes hard and chops off the cock...
Why hack to kill when you can go further than that.
>>62338569
Car washes can kill you if they are hacked.
Dr Anon spoke out this week revealing that women could eventually turn on their partners and even families– but not by developing their own minds.
No, the lecturer said women could prove to be dangerous if social marxism manage to get into their heads, something that would likely be pretty straight forward compared to taking over computers or mobiles.
>>62341260
It would depend entirely on the design of the vagina.
Could be easily prevented by not having it physically capable of constricting to that degree.
Why do people always assume humanoid robots will be stronger than us?
>>62341448
Because they are machines so of course they will be stronger than humans.
>>62339580
The grate has holes.
>>62341448
humans are stupid and therefore mechanical creations will also continue to be stupid
nothing to do with power tbqh
>>62338569
Like I would purchase something that is strong enough to kill me AND can connect to the internet.
Fuck that. AI should never be allowed to "upgrade" themselves online.
>>62341208
Got one for robot gf?
>>62338569
>Angry feminists?
Angry fucking everybody, including most women. But they're more likely to try to ban them by any means than to hack them.
O would just run Linux on mine.
> not installing your own killswitch before you've even pulled your dick out.
This is the difference between /g/ and /diy/. You guys are too stupid to protect yourselves because you have not a fucking clue how your shit works.
>>62338569
>iot robotfu
>ever
iot is the worse "advancement" in tech recently