What went so wrong?
>when some people can't tell the difference of a hyperlink and formatted text
>even obscure japanese websites you got off of google maps are more aesthetically pleasing than google
sad
>>62322998
https://wiby.me
the most aesthetically pleasing websites
minimalism
>>62322998
>What went so wrong?
Blue-haired CSS/PHP koders took over the industry and want to overdo everything
Take a look at some real websites:
http://motherfuckingwebsite.com/
http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/
Even the TTC site is good
>>62323169
>>62323297
>>62323429
Its because they think by keeping the main text lines short, you are more likely to keep reading. If you have to follow your eyes all the way across your wide screen, its harder to read. I'm guessing.
>>62323462
But 4chan is easy to read.
Judge the Washington Post's web design.
DISCLAIMER: I have Cambria as my default font for everything in Nightly, so your mileage may vary on the font choice. Instead judge other aspects.
>>62323429
It's because this design can be used on both desktops and phones
>>62325039
Honestly, left-locked text is bad period.
Can you imagine if books actually had text on the left page begin at the very edge of the paper, yet the right page had text begin all the way deep into the spine?
>>62324982
Not bad. Reminds me of a newspaper.
>>62324982
>serif on web
>>62325171
kill all webfags
>>62323462
Use multiple columns and horizontal scrolling for ultrawide displays.
>>62325171
>sans-serif in newspaper
>>62324982
It's decent but way too crowded.
>>62324982
It's the Apple >DUDE WHITE SPACE ON THE SIDES EVERYTHING IN THE CENTER OF THE SCREEN LMAO design
>>62325300
whats wrong with that
>>62325300
taking up the entire available space looks cluttered as fuck, it's always been poor web design to do that
>>62324982
Spacing it out a bit could help