It says here your screen resolution is 1366x768, care to explain why?

on a 12 inch screen, that's high DPI

>>62283676
I'm poor okay.

>>62283676
My TV is 1366x768.

Why should I buy a new one when it still works perfectly, has no botnet, and new TV's still have shit colors and no dynamic range?

But it's 1920x1080

Because I'm a fucking retard who did not bother to check the resolution while buying my Thinkpad meme.

File: 1429815606714.png (5KB, 210x229px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 210x229px

>>62283676
The store said TN panels are good for gaming, it has an intel gpu after all.

>>62283768
same, kek

>>62283745
And has been for how long?
Ten years, wow!

>>62283676
> It says here your screen resolution is 1366x768
Why?

>>62283676
Because my x230t still works fine performance wise and the tablet mode is neat.
Also, I'm waiting for good Raven Ridge laptops to appear.

>>62283682
lolno

>>62283676
poorfag

>>62283676
Daily reminder that if you buy a 720p notebook/monitor in 2017 you're mentally incapable of realizing that you're only supporting those who maintain and sell obsolete technology. There ARE cheap 1080p options, you just have to look for it.

>>62283976
How cheap is cheap? I won't pay more than $300 for IPS 1080p laptop. RAM and HDD must be upgradeable.

>>62283676
Well, because it's the native resolution of my display. Now what faggot.

>>62283999
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B01MTWZJ7A/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1504711770&sr=8-1-spons&pi=AC_SX236_SY340_QL65&keywords=fusion5+laptop&psc=1

>>62284031
ram isn't upgradable

>>62283768
>>62283804
Then upgrade it you fucks

>>62283999
>upgradeable laptop RAM in 2017
I fucking wish.

>>62283676

Because I'm poor. Bought the thing at a walmart 5 years ago for $100.

Anything above 1080p on a 27 inch screen is a waste of money

>>62284103
Yet here I am getting suicidal over a 24 inch 1080p screen

>>62283676
Because I use a 6 years old notebook, and I still have no reason other than screen resolution to upgrade.

>more battery life
>more GPU performance
>720p video is enough, so yous ave bandwidth on torrents and YouTube
Why would I want a laptop with a higher resolution?

I don't have space to hook up my proper monitor to my laptop

>>62283676
Its actually 2960x1440... on a 5.8 inch screen
>Samsung.memefile

>>62284284
I also have a 17.3 inch full hd dolby certified screen
>spendingneetcash.walletdata

>>62284185
Specs please

>>62284325
HP ProBook 4520s
i3 350
4GB ram
120GB ssd
Gigabit LAN
Linux Mint

>>62284402
>Intel i3 350
I feel bad for you, you remind me of my celeron and atom days.
I used to have my parents buy me the cheapest second hand shit.
I mostly had
A single/dual thread atom or celeron
1gb of ram... ddr1
80gb suffering hdr
1024×something screen
Dead battery
We had ADSL... 1mbps
Windows xp/7 with included adware.

Currently rocking a i7 6700hq of
Nvidia gtx 965m of
8gb of ddr4 ram
250gb m2 sad
Windows 10 with vm machines
150mbps hybrid fiber coax
>feelsgoodtobeolder.jpg

File: implay.png (8KB, 590x309px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 590x309px

>>62283676
>Implying

>>62284402
Just noticed elitebook in the comment.
I had a elitebook 8560p... it was hot... really hot.

>>62284402
I have

ProBook 4530s
i3 2350M
8GB RAM
120 GB SSD
Windows 10 because VS and C#


I also have a new G4 450 but I still have no time to install all my shit

File: this is bait.webm (1MB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1080x1080px

>>62283682

This thread hurt my feels

File: Holger Prothmann Baden-Württemberg cropped.jpg (2MB, 3840x3840px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x3840px

>>62284553
4K más tardes

>>62284540
I use it to consume(4chan, tv shows), not to produce.
I have a good desktop, and use that to develop etc, and a home server that handels almost every background task I could outsource to it

>>62283676
1366x768 is perfectly acceptable on small laptop screens.

File: 1504580559043.jpg (37KB, 400x386px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 400x386px

>>62283676
>not using 640x480 as demanded by god

File: 1504027165844.jpg (160KB, 640x853px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 640x853px

My monitor attached to the docking station died yesterday.
Now I'm stuck using my X230 IPS with 12,5" on 1377x768 until friday.
The image is clear but the screen is fucking tiny for any serious use. Of course it's fine when you're not on your desk.
Would having 1920x1080 on this tiny screen even help at all?

>>62283676
>It says here your screen resolution is 1366x768, care to explain why?
It just works, m9. Also x220 is decent and enough for my needs. My Desktop computer has 3840x1080, if I need more computing power or a higher resolution

>>62283976
I bought mine 5 years ago.

>>62283676
But my work-laptop is full HD, comes with 8gb ram and was shipped with win7 32-bit version, because HP are geniuses

>>62283736
>new TV's still have shit colors and no dynamic range
???

>>62287466
>comes with 8gb ram and was shipped with win7 32-bit version
what the fuck

File: 1498253864343.jpg (41KB, 512x600px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 512x600px

It was cheap
And its not THAT bad

>>62283682
Most mid range 5" phones have a 1080p screen
768p sucks, even on 12"

>>62284540
I have i7, but have to keep it at 70% because otherwise it boosts too much and produces too much heat.

>>62283976
I only watch 720p anime and it's fine. Why would I want 1080p?

>>62285851
Does God work for IBM and VESA?

>>62283688
No, it's not okay.

because you haven't supplied me with a better work machine

>>62283676
Sir, your IT department has yet to provide me with a 1920x1080 monitor.

>>62283676
I'm poor. That's literally why I came here to get a job