Why is Flash slower in Firefox compared to Chrome?

>>62282477

Google had Adobe make a tailor made version of Flash for Chrome with extra features.
Not even kidding.

>>62282477
Probably because google bakes a customs chrome-tailored version of flash directly into the browser. Also flash sucks dick so who cares?

>>62282555
>with extra features
Typical. Sadly a waste, because at the end of it all, it's still fucking flash

>>62282568
Like it or not, flash will still be around for the next decade

File: 1496754858732.jpg (21KB, 328x559px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 328x559px

>>62282837

Honestly I'd sing praises if it was Flash only.

>few months ago, went to do my taxes online
>"the application needs Java enabled, please use Internet Explorer"

ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME HERE?

>>62282931
What's taking Unity so long anyway?

>>62282477
>Flash
ew