Prove me AMD is better

>Prove me
No. Stupid frogposter.

The proof is left as an exercise for the reader.

>>62245244
/thread

fpbp desu senpai

LEAVE FROGPOSTER ALONE

File: 1j.png (1016B, 28x28px) Image search: [Google]

1016B, 28x28px

>>62245337
kys faggot

>>62245236
Prove me you deserve to live, dumb frog poster

>>62245374
LEAVE FROG-O ALONE

File: you.jpg (256KB, 1248x1080px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 1248x1080px

>>62245382
>>62245353
>>62245236

File: IMG_20170904_100620.jpg (53KB, 1080x308px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 1080x308px

>>62245398
No

>>62245236
Well, for CPUs, a Ryzen 1xxx is a more futureproof choice thanks to AM4 and they're probably pretty much on par with Intel's soon coming 8th gen lineup as long as you consider price/perf, core count and wattage as well.

For GPUs, they're not better in terms of price/perf or wattage but the Polaris series (rx580 best) is at least as good as NVidia's offering. Just consider your local prices. And keep in mind that with NVidia it's harder and less certain to use the card in a virtual machine, which is what we all should be doing by now.

>>62245504
Thank you for a real answer.

In terms of CPU, Intel and Ryzen have big differences? Because all benchmarks I see seem too biased

File: 1501151973931.jpg (153KB, 915x1623px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 915x1623px

>Defending AMD in 2017

How dos id fil to bi pur?

>>62245670
Depends on what you do.
In terms of single threaded performance Ryzen is slightly behind Intel due to its lower clock speed.
In multi threaded workloads it's ahead due to far more cores (at the same price) and more efficient SMT.
Ryzen is also more efficient than Intel's offerings.

>>62245236
It's not if you are forced to only use Trash windows 10

>>62245766
I am going to build a PC for gaming. Should I go for Ryzen 5?

>>62245802
Seems decent, but go for the 6 core R5 1600.

>>62245823
Thank you!!

I will work around that, you were a huge help

>>62245236
No, just get a quad core for 300. Fuck you lol.

>>62245670
I went from a i5 4690 that struggled with everything

1600x on the other hand never goes over 50% runs very cool

>>62246161
A friend of mine must be a shill. He keeps saying 7600K is way better

>>62247170
He probably plays arma, and early access games a lot, or just older titles modded. Outside of that it really doesn't matter what cpu you get to be quit honest.