Wow

File: wowowne.jpg (30KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 800x450px

>>62236932

>>62236932
it needs a skirt to hide those ugly ass cables

>>62236932
Is that a heatsink case? A fanless x86 PC?

File: maxresdefault.jpg (112KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1280x720px

>>62236932
Its fucking WHITE!

File: 1473086085772.jpg (477KB, 1594x2023px) Image search: [Google]

477KB, 1594x2023px

mods are asleep post sinks

File: db4b-025-090.jpg (72KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 1200x900px

>>62236999

File: 780874.jpg (82KB, 900x675px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 900x675px

>>62236932
This

>>62237102
nice fingerbox

File: outdoor-distribution-transformer-250x250.jpg (19KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 250x250px

looks like a transformer, cool

>>62236932
Extreeeeeeme

>>62236987
Yeah, works OK for light workloads from what I gather.

If they thought this through to its logical conclusion they would add the option for a 180mm fan on top.

>>62237106
Haven't thought about my old fingerbox decades. Probably somewhere in the basement

>>62237069
Look at all the wasted space between the fins and the base.

I'm no mechanical engineer but it seems it'd dissipate more heat if it was just designed like a normal heatsink, fins coming up vertically straight from the base.

>>62236969
/Thread

>>62237218
I'm no engineer either, but this lets air flow through from the beginning of the case to the end right through the sink, improving airflow overall, where vertical fins would be like a wall to the air.

File: 1473501344244-1.png (722KB, 557x555px) Image search: [Google]

722KB, 557x555px

>>62236957

File: slavformer.jpg (153KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 1280x800px

>>62237114
sorry, wrong pic

>>62237525
>vertical fins would be like a wall to the air.
airflow is unidirectional anyway, make sure the fins/troughs are aligned with the airflow and you won't have any problems. There is absolutely nothing to gain from all that wasted space between the base and the fins. I'm not gonna run a simulation but distance is crucial for heat dissipation and that heatsink is wasting all the "prime real-estate".

Take the rods, turn 'em into fins that spike directly from the base, and you probably have a design that's 2x as efficient.

>>62237106
>>62237151
What the hell is a fingerbox

>>62239968
found the newfag

>>62237127
Supposedly it does just fine with up to 65w processors, but performance is better with lower tdp of course
I imagine something like the 54w Pentium g4560 + a passive gpu like a 1030 would be really cool

>>62237218
Ram clearance, all wide heatsink are like that

>>62240009
AHA I GOT YOU
I WAS MERELY PRETENDING TO BE RETARDED

>>62240138
You have shit taste.

Undervolted underclocked ryzen 1700 with a Palit KalmX 1050ti.

>>62236969
Qt computer dedicated case skirts when?

>>62240138
God damn, now with the huge improvement in low power processors this is pretty cool, I might consider something like it when I upgrade my media pc from the shit laptop I'm using

>>62241166
Raven Ridge APU and a TV card. Best media center PC ever

It is somewhat cute but colorless.

>>62236932
>Using the case as a heatsink
good idea
>that bunch of building restrictions
Nah thanks.
I would really like to see a case / heat transfer technology that allows me to use a metal desktop for heatsiking purposes

>>62236932
>turn on computer
>it flies away

>>62242419
They have tgat. Even as an aluminum server rack case. Guess what though? They all have
>that bunch of build restrictions
Physics can't be broken.

>>62242032
it's a fat piece of shit

>>62236932
Give me sauces you fucking animal

>>62244223
>Physics can't be broken.
I didnt mean that, I was talking about being able to use only certain mobos because of the CPU socket location. Go the the manufacturer's page and you'll se what Im talking about.
But All that aluminum anly to dissipate 65W? Why would not they male a case with a greater surface to be able to dissipate the heat better?
IMHO this is sacrificing way too much thermal dissipation efficiency just for looks

>>62236932
>those bent cables
lel