Infamous developers, Episode 1...

>>62225901
Literally who?

>>62225901
>using any other DE than Xfce
I will never understand this. Is it basically just distro-hopping Windows wetbacks who care about these bloated DEs?

>>62225901
KDE3 was fucking awesome, when KD4 showed was like another DE, a shitty new one, the year of linux desktop would have happened

File: 31de09fbaac014e7630ba5de08359525.jpg (60KB, 703x536px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 703x536px

>>62225901
for his work as chief software architect to remove all that was wrong with windows XP and replace it with windows vista.

File: mark-shuttleworth.jpg (19KB, 215x215px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 215x215px

for allowing unity to be the default DE on ubuntu

>>62225954
If your computer can handle it then what's the problem with a little bloat if you get a bunch a customizability in turn?

>>62226091
Because a terminal has even more "customizability", with none of the bloat.

>>62226118
Maybe for a computer made in 1990s.

>>62226118
customizability without convenience

>>62226053
Unity is the most functional and user friendly DE so there is nothing wrong with this.
>>62226021
Vista was a step in the right direction brainlet

>>62226053
Unity was the only useful DE, now we will have a meme DE

>>62225954
>using a desktop environment
Just install Windowmaker, free yourself.

OP, how about some names for your 'name and shame' thread?

>>62225901
can't you just use kde 3 instead of kde whatever? if you love it so much fork it.

plasma 5 is great.

>>62225901
>KDE 3, the most popular Linux DE
wasn't that GNOME 2, though?

>>62226323
It was full of bugs at the early days. Not to mention gayming on it was pain in the ass.

>>62226323
>Vista was a step in the right direction
longhorn was

>>62225901
KDE 4 was pretty bad to begin with, but it's matured into a stable DE.

GNOME 3 was a titanic piece of shit and it's only getting worse.

>>62227883
KDE3 was more popular.