What's your opinion on Trisquel? Have you ever used

It's pretty decent, I think Trisquel and Void Linux are the most underrated distros out there right now.

>>62200218
Fidget Spinners.

>>62200236
I've been using Xubuntu and Manjaro for some time and wanted to try one of those "Free" OSes. This one looks the most decent atm.

>>62200218
Ubuntu.

>>62200218
Trisquel is comfy as hell. I've used it for years with no package or compatibility problems. Don't believe the memers about the free software packages/kernel being lacking.

>>62200826
I just installed it on Vbox... It seems pretty OK. I'm probably going to stick with Manjaro tho... AUR is too op...

What benefits does Ubuntu have over using Debian without any nonfree shit?

I thought one of the main benefits of *buntus is it takes care of all of those nonfree codecs you need to seek out after installing on distros like Debian and openSUSE.

>>62200910
Aparently Trisqueldoes just that, but as I now see that many of apps that I use are nonfree (wine, steam, freeCAD, libreCAD...)

It's pretty k if you only plan to code and browse internet.

>>62200968
Or you can just install those non-free programs. Trisquel doesn't prevent you from installing non-free software...

Parabola is much better. While I appreciate Trisquel's freedom, I can't help and feel that it's a bit outdated at this point.

>>62201264
It definitely is. IIRC Trisquel only has one maintainer.

>>62201262
What's the point in using a free OS if you're just going to install the non-free stuff?

>>62201631
Convenience? Sucker.

>>62201631
There isn't but everytime I see Trisquel come up, some retard is going hurr durr free software doesn't give you the freedom to install non-free software.