Did you guys know that wireless surround sound home theater is an oxymoron? It's a technological achievement that won't be attained until speakers are built directly into our heads. In the meantime, provided you aren't an ultra richfag who can run power to any spot under your floor, the soundbar is the only wireless option. If your living room isn't huge, i.e. >25 m^2, a soundbar is indistinguishable from a surround sound system of a comparable price.
However, I am left wondering if a subwoofer can be built into a soundbar like with the "Q Acoustics Media 4 Soundbar with Built In Subwoofer (Multi-Award Winning)."
>wireless surround
Why would you want that?
And how is it expensive to install cables?
>>62195819
Cables look like shit, except in large living rooms, the only place you'd expect to see surround sound, where they become clutter.