Brave new CPU world: Neo-AMD & Intel

>>62191445
AMD has less botnet iirc

>>62191655
we still dont know how psp works sounds like a botnet free but who the fuck knows

Best thing to do is look for benchmarks and review articles already out there on the subject.
AMD and Intel enthusiast chips are fairly even, but they vary slightly in different areas.

Basically, what I am saying is, just fucking google it.

>>62191445
Intel chips still hold the performance crown in all workloads. AMD remains the option for people who can't afford the best.

File: d917fcc2b5dcda26e251e2dfa34e614c.jpg (6KB, 240x240px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 240x240px

>>62191861
sure it does gibbo sure it does

I always try and root for the underdog and Ryzen is my first AMD CPU since bulldozer was just really bad overall.

AMD of course moar coars, cheaper mobos, and a socket that will be used more extensively than intel. Better price to performance.

intel better single coar performance. thats all that intel really has. Intel overclocks better than ryzen but ryzen 2 will be better at OC

File: 1431399633943.jpg (152KB, 640x720px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 640x720px

>Buy first gen 1151 board+i3 thinking Intel will launch 6 core chip before they change sockets.
>they finally do
>same socket new chipset

Now I guess it's just waiting to buy a 6700k/7700k used down the road.

if you want to play gay gayms then buy intel
if you want to do anything else buy amd

there is no reason to buy intel
games 1600 is practicly on par with LEL 4 cores MHU OC 7700K
1700 and the rest really just shits on intel in general
r3 literally made g450 obsolete

File: 1473089929247.jpg (11KB, 400x467px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 400x467px

>>62192029
Wonder who could be behind that post

>>62191445
the new JEWRIPPER processor is your best bet for pretty much everything.

16 BBC sized cores puts intel's cores to shame.

File: 1498692555928.jpg (112KB, 691x771px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 691x771px

>>62191861
>Intel chips still hold the performance crown in all workloads.

>>62191861
>The best
If you are not already preordering 4 Xeon Platinums, you cannot afford the best. 'The best' can only be the highest performers which is way out of reach to those 18-core i9 buyers. An entire brand range cannot be 'the best' since there are always SKUs that performs worse than others at a cheaper price point. No way the 7980XE can hold the 'performance crown' when there are multiple-socket Xeons that have significantly more cores and similar clock speeds as the i9.

AMD is 95% of the performance for considerably cheaper

>>62191861
SOPA

>>62192036
>if you want to play gay gayms then buy intel
what about the stuttering meme

The 1600x isnt even cheaper than the 7600k, they are about even.

Maybe its just my location.

File: 1503516294809.jpg (85KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 720x720px

>>62191445
choose amd if
>you benefit from multicore performance
>you don't want to sacrifice 50-70% better multicore performance for 5-20% single core performance at the same pricepoint
>you want good temps
>you want an upgrade path on the same motherboard

choose intel if
>you need that extra ST performance
>you need low-latency (not so sure about this one)
>you want a space heater (i9 or OC'd 7700k)

pick your poison

>>62192455
nope