>Be PHP coder >Create social media website that allows

>>62189828
Still looks like shit

>>62189921
how would you change it? I am not sure how to make it look the way you want it.

>>62189937
Shrink some text, don't have the first thing be a single image slideshow. Better navigation. ect

Gut most of the reader's responsibility

>>62189921
IT LOOKS GOOD NICE TRY ((()))

>>62189999
>quads.
Also. How would you implement navigation? What do you expect?

stop shilling your drupal site on my image board.

dumb drupalposter

Dude i like the fact you made this but jesus fuck fix the mobile version of the site. Fuck these spergs most normies use their phones for everything.

>>62190083
I hand coded it man.

>>62190037
How about most of the buttons on the nav bar to work? Browsing postings looks shitty because the design is simple in the sense that it looks like it was slapped together poorly. Also minimalism sucks

>google analytics
>google captcha
>google CDN
>twitterstrap

No, sir.

>>62190119
What's wrong with the mobile version? I've tested it on my S8+ and haven't had an issue.


>>62190121
>Looks like it was slapped together poorly. Also minimalism sucks
Can you give me an example of how you would want it to look?

>>62190129
I don't have a captcha.

File: captcha.png (103KB, 532x567px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 532x567px

>>62190157

Google Recaptcha loads in the head. You might be using a framework with jewish tricks.

>>62190157
>Can you give me an example of how you would want it to look?
I just did. Quit sucking and make something nice faggot. I'm not going to hold your hand.
>google
Ditch it. Fags use google.

>>62190211
I was using that for a test on my site in case I needed a recaptcha but as of right now there is no recaptcha running on the site.

I started some work on a dark-theme.css but never got through to it. Would this be something that would be to your taste /g/?

File: dark-theme.jpg (171KB, 1874x951px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 1874x951px

Here is what the dark theme looks like. I was playing around with the font size as well.

>>62190479
shoot just realized there was some old styling there I will need to rewrite it to make it right again.

I just applied the dark theme for live... does that look at all better for you?

File: 1501455664360.jpg (78KB, 640x522px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 640x522px

>>62190157
This has to be bait. I mean, if you can't see what's wrong with the mobile site there isn't any hope for this thing anyhow. R.I.Pepperoni

What do you guys think of the dark theme? I literally just coded this. What do you think?

>>62190743
I am not baiting I am sorry. Can you provide a screenshot of what you're talking about?

>>62189828
>1stamender.com
you have horrible taste and no matter how hard you try you will never be able to change that.

>>62190877
Okay. How about something constructive?

So legitimately... I am looking for people who believe in a change of current censorship. If you feel like you want to do something about it with me... let me know. This is not a matter of offering a platform for the alt-right, the alt-left, etc. This is about having a platform for all and defending that value. Is anyone here with me?

>>62190901
Sometimes giving up is the most constructive thing you can do.

>>62190975
Sorry. It's too important to me to give up.

>>62190901
>big blue bar that takes up too much screen space and never leaves
>disgusting bold font that is really hard to read
>color scheme all over the place. (Brown, blue, red, black,red)
>the bottom space is unnecessarily long
>small images while browsing the catalogs
There is a lot you could change. You're taking everything thats ugly about modern websites and putting it into one hot pile of shit.

File: 1503110902326.jpg (71KB, 650x471px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 650x471px

>>62189828
http://motherfuckingwebsite.com/

I am not posting this to be funny. Less is more.

>>62189828
This site looks like a terrible idea, from the look of it articles are freely lifted from other sites (at least they're "cited" ;^) ) ,the focus on being anti-censorship is going to make it a haven for more obnoxious conservatives who'll turn it into a heavily biased circlejerk like /pol/, if the site even takes on at all.

What's the sorting algorithm like, how are people supposed to sort through shit that anyone can post? Won't each article wind up full of uncited unverifiable rumour and conjecture set to confirm the author's biases?

Most media companies have editorial oversight for a reason, it's just an unfortunate fact that money and resources to run a company come with agendas.

>>62190120
It shoes

File: image.jpg (435KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

435KB, 750x1334px

>>62190860
Not him, but for example.
Why are you making me scroll almost an entire page for a category?

>>62191075
>it shoes.

>>62191077
I can change this. Thank you for the suggestion.

>>62189828
keep up the good work

people will hate it, but it will only get better if you ask for their help

File: image.jpg (280KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 750x1334px

>>62191101
You're welcome. Also, the menu should expand downwards here, and the search bar is out of place. It also could be in the header, it certainly has space to be.

>>62191125
Thanks man. I am working hard on it and do want to see less censorship. It is kinda' the motif of 4chan to immediately shit on anything that isn't trolling someone or hating on something. Which is fine. People are free to say what they want to say. Occasionally I get a nice response from someone. It makes me feel like we are in a world of a mixed bag. Hence the way a website should be.

>>62191054
Yeah a lot of articles are copy pasted. To be honest I'm not bothered by it being that we're anti-copyright as it kills off people's freedoms and allows big corporations to corner a market that would otherwise be easy to enter with patents and copyright.

>>62191152
Great suggestion. To be perfectly honest... that damn navbar is so so finnicky to the point I am afraid to touch it. But I will see what I can do. You are not wrong!

>>62189828
You're going to run into a lot of trouble if you keep letting your contributors aggregate (steal) articles from the big boys.
You may be some libertarian wackjob but you're still beholden to the laws of the US and it's your responsibility under the DMCA to actively police IP theft on your site.
That's why reddit works as a news aggregator, they only post links to articles. Their subreddits may be moderated by anonymous cabals and article visibility may be dictated by the tyranny of the majority but they don't repost copyrighted content, they just link to stolen content on imgur.

>>62191189
Then it is an object to deal with natural law when the time comes. I know I will get into trouble here and we can fight what is wrong. Just because someone spews a stream of words doesn't mean someone shouldn't be able to share that information. It would be one hell of a fight and I would most likely lose. I really just don't care. I want information to be shared and transferred as that increases our overall quality of life.

>>62191075
You obviously hand coded that reply

>>62191176
Also, studies show that most people have no idea what the hamburger is for on mobile sites despite the fact that it's everywhere. You should probably also have the text "Menu" next to it and not just an icon. For the sake of accessibility

>>62191216
That's a terrible hill to die on.
Journalism is a job, these people are paid to do original research. It's work. They cite their sources if they take anything because information is of value.
They work on commission from media outlets who WILL sue you into the dirt when they find out you plagarised entire articles.
These media outlets survive on clicks and ad views for revenue and when they find out that you're stealing visibility from them they'll rain lawyers on you, and guess what? Even if it's "unfair" that media comes from big outlets with actual resources, the law's on their side.

I'm actually doing you a favour by warning you, shut the site down.

>>62191312
We cited each and every article and secondly if someone has a problem with a specific article worst comes to worst we take down the 1 article out of thousands. I really really really don't like doing it but for the sake of the site not getting taken down I can make a few reasonable sacrifices.

>>62191344
na.

>>62191349
That's not an excuse, you can't host content that isn't yours, it's illegal. Citing the sources is pretty much just you admitting culpability. You're dealing with very large corporations and one lawsuit for one article will bankrupt you.

>>62191378
Provided you site the source it is fine. I source it + provide a link and suggest to support the original writer. Secondly when I get actual people writing I would have no problem simply taking down all articles that have been cited from my site.

>>62191349
copy r*ddit and find a way to link the articles instead of just copy-pasting. But still allow for posting your own shit.

>>62191412
Holy shit, it's like talking to a brick wall.
You clearly don't have the discipline or fundamental business knowledge to run a news site.
May God have mercy on you when you get found out. Not if, but when.

>>62191420
In the event something does happen... the rules do state that it does not allow copyrighted material. I only did the copy paste to fill up the database with things. There are also a good amount of articles that have been written by regular people.

Here's one of many: https://1stamender.com/article.php?articlenumber=1227

This guy is a socialist I found very passionate about what he talks about.

This lady runs a podcast and adverts it on my site: https://1stamender.com/article.php?articlenumber=1277

This guy is a classic alt-righter: https://1stamender.com/article.php?articlenumber=1008

This guy posted one article and never posted another interestingly enough: https://1stamender.com/article.php?articlenumber=810

Point that I'm getting at is I'm just trying to fill the site up till I get actual articles.

>>62191482
I don't think it would be as bad as you predict. I really don't know until I give it a shot. Also that the site itself does not condone posting copyrighted material as stated in the rules.

>>62191486
>never posted another interestingly enough
There's no incentive.

>>62191503
I thought about creating a leveling system or something to help that along... but eh. Just seemed like fluff to me.

>>62191497
You're in clear violation of the DMCA.
It doesn't matter what you put it the rules, you're responsible for what users put on your site.

>>62191526
most journalists work for cash

>>62191551
I'm not looking for journalists. I'm looking for any joe-shmoe who is passionate about what they preach.

>>62191556
and best of luck to you


you'll need it

>>62191533
It could operate as a frontend or reverse proxy to a tor hidden service that runs the site.

No potentially illegal content is hosted on a system he manages himself.

File: KAIrU21.png (32KB, 703x408px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 703x408px

>>62189828
Went onto the site and was given this message.
I highlighted it to see the full message but this obviously does not seem right.

>>62191604
Ah. That's the modal. Let me fix that.

>>62191556
they'll get more visibility on social media, unless what they're preaching gets taken down, in which case your site will just be a safehaven for hate speech, is that what you want?

>>62189828
>html 5
first and last time I ever visit your shit site

>>62189828
Are you using Laravel? What PHP framework is this my dude

>>62191619
I want a safe haven for all speech. I want it for controversial speech and good speech.

>>62191673
nobody is going to use it for anything but hate speech, you'll get a reputation

File: iGSqhCs.png (28KB, 1918x965px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 1918x965px

>>62191612
Also, when going to an article that does not exist, I am presented with this.
You might want to fix the design of this a little as it looks too compact.

Tell you what. I'll start up a discord so you can sign in and voice your concerns. It's easier for me that way.

discord.gg/uSBnckW

>>62191726

What only one?

>opinion
>the dude
nice touch
but it still looks ugly 2bh

File: roland-margins.png (172KB, 1889x936px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1889x936px

The navigation is huge. Even on a 27" monitor, I can see only half of the sections at once, and without context. They just say things like "Technology" and "Gaming", but that doesn't tell me enough about what I'm going to find at the other side of the link. Compare that to 4chan's homepage, even. There, all of the boards are clearly visible. They're categorized. They're even labeled as being "Boards". Other derivatives will have things like Fast/Recent/Top/Quality Threads on the homepage so you can find interesting discussions right away.

You should pick one background color instead of two. The black and gray does not look good. Usually, when sites choose a background, too, they'll at least have the content on white boxes. For example, Roland has a similar sort of layout with a carousel at the top of many pages, but their content is all on white with gray margins (pic related). It's easy to read and makes it clear where the "page" is

The fonts in the header also make the Ts look like Bs. I thought you had a typo and it said "Regisber" when I first glanced at it.

I'd also put the name "Firstamender" in the top left next to the logo. It will emphasize the logo and will make it more clear that the site itself is called Firstamender. The question "What is Firstamender?" doesn't do enough to ensure that that really is the name of the site and not just a topic that the site is about, or something else, for example.

You also have a lot of broken image links on the actual topic pages. Check out the img element's onerror attribute. There, you can define a default placeholder for when things don't load correctly

File: smug.jpg (121KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1280x720px

>>62191050
OP please see this post. ^

/g/ is not your personal qa. there's a reason people get paid to do that shit

gtfo

>>62192125
I saw it.

>>62189828
your intro paragraph was written by a 5 year old. kys.

>>62190222
then remove it. that shit tracks users when they make a network request to load it.

>>62192624
THEN UNFUCKYOURSELF, NIGGER

>>62192637
I'll see what I can do. In the mean time. I enjoy the feedback.

discord.gg/uSBnckW

>>62189828
> php
looks like someone will hacc

>>62189828
Disable TLS 1.0 ciphers. I'd also close off FTP and just do file transfer over SSH.

>>62192669
>Discord
Don't use that, it's proprietary software.

Deploy your own Matrix server.

https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse

Also GPL your source code so people can fix it all themselves instead of waiting for you to unfuck the website.

>>62189828
>less censorship overall and no data mining
>a wild altruist appears
until it takes off, suddenly you cant afford hosting anymore out of pocket so you start advertising and censoring content to conform with advertisers - then it gets bigger and you start getting insane money offers for taking it public, thinking thats great you go ahead and then ((they)) sit you down and let you know youre going to allow it to be taken over or they ruin you and take it anyway, so you take the money and begin living on your own island with your waifu in exchange for selling your soul, your users and your dream

i'll save you all that trouble by ignoring your shill post

>>62191673
you remind me of me ten years ago. been there, done that.

when you start sites predicated on "free speech", if you have any sort of meaningful growth past the like dozen or so principled free-speech libertarians that start the community, you basically get the dregs of the internet who managed to get banned from everywhere else. The resulting speech is going to be drivel written by complete fucking idiots that you will learn to hate and gradually make you lose interest in the site over time..unless you're one of those idiots, then you'll be happy as a clam i guess...

most people actually want some sort of moderation, it's why those big social media companies invest so much in those nefarious moderation techniques you described in your OP, people like their filter bubbles.

>>62192798
kek, this is accurate

>>62192798
there are companies that are pro-libertarian. With that being said we simply wouldn't let these giant companies bully people into removal of their rights.

>>62192844
While I agree with what you are saying. You are also being highly presumptive of an overall populace. I do believe that people do have the intent to do good. If something is labeled as clearly spam it can be removed and moderated on the site. However I do not make this an excuse to simply remove content without a very very good reason to do so.

File: 1503517212000.jpg (22KB, 373x327px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 373x327px

>>62192927
lol listen to how autistic this guy sounds. post a picture of yourself for us to laugh at please.

File: me.jpg (105KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 960x960px

>>62192969
K.

Can you change that light blue to something more neutral? It's very hard on the eyes and it's also the exact same color as Google blue.

>>62191050
God damn! I miss the old tubes. I built a shitty php/mysql site years ago for work to keep track of jobs, purchase orders, service orders. Nothing special, just some tables and forms to insert data into the forms.
>I didn't touch it for two years.
>Boss got tired of me having to edit his fuckups in phpmyadmin because I won't give him the password, so I added some ajax so they could edit it on the pages.
>Year goes by, summerfag millennials get hired and had a web design class in college, says database looks archaic, wants to redo it with angular.js and shit to make it pretty and "responsive".
>Site is litteral garbage now and takes seconds to load a page.
>Boss bitches about how slow my inferior database is and decides to hire real designer company to code new database. Spends thousands and it got hacked by chinks in a week.
>We now use a spreadsheet because of security and shit. Accounting is fucked because people copy the spreadsheet off of my fileserver and edit it on their own computer. No versioning.
The saddest point of all this is we are a literal tech company of sorts in automation. The walking disasters in my office couldn't set a static IP on their computer if their lives depended on it.

File: not-afraid-to-show-myself-to-you.jpg (389KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

389KB, 2048x1536px

>>62192969
aaaand just for fun. Timestamp. I'm not afraid to show myself.

>>62192903
>wouldn't let these giant companies bully people into removal of their rights
We already have. The dailystormer might be offensive but it's still censoring free speech by denying their hosting. The only reason the censorship hasn't turned on the left is because they still have their muh nazi alt-right boogeyman. It's only a matter of time before that pendulum swings back, look at the UK with free ("hate") speech laws

inb4 /pol/

>>62193107
It sure does suck. The daily stormer wasn't about freedom of speech to begin with. The entire concept was to have only alt-right ideas. My site promotes all of that. Anyone who is willing to take down my site due to it being 'too free' is something that should be taken up with the highest law of the land. ... (The constitution)

The daily stormer sought to actively harm people with their agenda. That is not what 1stamender is.

>>62193130
CHANGE THE FUCKING BLUE REEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>62193158
Whyyy do you hate my blue I like it reee

File: 1389210409727.png (147KB, 815x678px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 815x678px

>>62193068
You have nice eyes, Anon

>>62193192
Oh! Thank you.

>>62192927
>You are also being highly presumptive of an overall populace. I do believe that people do have the intent to do good
You are in for a rude awakening.

I repeat, Your site will only be attractive to people who got kicked out of other social spaces. Most people don't get kicked out of social spaces, and will take one look at your site and recoil in horror. Being "free speech" or "like that other site but with free speech" isn't enough of a draw in and of itself.

>>62193275
>Free speech isn't enough
Nigga I don't think you understand how important it is. But that your rights are being taken away and eroded little by little not by your government, but by corporations. This is a new evil unseen by history that must be stopped with the same power they use to stop your freedoms. I've already made 1stamender.com an LLC and I've already got the site coded. I am working out a few bugs but when I find people willing to help me in this cause is when this site takes off and a revolution can begin against the tyranny of the biggest tech companies in the world.

File: Screenshot_20170831-230557_01.png (1MB, 1080x1674px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1080x1674px

Remove the white ugly text please

>>62193400
Is it that ugly? I've had graphic designers tell me they love the text and to keep it. Others to remove it. I can't please everybody so I just keep it in.

>>62193334
if you're in this for the long run, please make the site design simpler. Make it as light as possible and easy to navigate. Stop with the bloated """""modern"""" design.

>>62193416
the big white text is really hard to read.

>>62193130
>The daily stormer sought to actively harm people with their agenda. That is not what 1stamender is.
haha dead on arrival

not that I'd ever visit your ugly trash web 2.0 shit again anyway.

>>62193422
>>>62193334
>if you're in this for the long run, please make the site design simpler. Make it as light as possible and easy to navigate. Stop with the bloated """""modern"""" design.


He's right. Make it small and simple. A lightweight website is always more comfy. Also the slideshow is very unecessary. We should be able to access topics, threads and debates directly on the first page

>>62193055
This.
>Free speech site
>Uses colour associated with censorship monster
Really makes me think.

File: .jpg (618KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

618KB, 2048x1536px

>>62192991
>>62193068
bahah fuck he actually did it, the absolute madman.

>>62193439
Done. Removed the custom font.

>>62193492
I see what you're saying. I was just using a color that pops and is easy business blue I guess. I'll think about changing the color but I've been using it for a while.

File: goolag.jpg (13KB, 320x179px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 320x179px

Make it more simple. A nnormie wouldn't be able to understand this website and it is hard to navigate. Do not make it look too fancy. NEVER USE RECAPTCHA.

>>62193497
lel

>>62193545
It's not that hard goddamn.

Wtf why did you post this now op the shot is broken. Why the fuck are you asking for public opinion when clicking links in the navbar still aren't opening consistently and >0 images in your main carousel aren't loading?

Also in that horrid bottom section where you show the different sections of the site, decrease the left and right padding on mobile view PLS. If you didn't mess with the padding yourself, then have the middle section be a span12 or a col-whatever-12

>>62193545
Agree. FUCK Goolag xDDDDDDD

File: my-favorite-tapiture-photos-of-the-week-50-photos-35.jpg (35KB, 600x451px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 600x451px

I still prefer https://diogn.es

no stupid banner articles, still free to say what you want

File: lemonparty.png (297KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 1920x1080px

>>62189828
Can you make the website look more like this?

>>62193068
You really fuckin goofed son.

File: Screenshot_2017-08-31_20-21-20.png (198KB, 663x468px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 663x468px

>professional
couldn't be more wrong lol

>>62193605
Why would anyone use a site that looks like that man...

where is the source op

I don't see the source

File: WTFisThisShit.png (158KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 400x300px

>>62189828

Learn to CSS, bruh. Also, terrible fucking domain name.

File: 4L_dtxgUk9A.jpg (116KB, 533x725px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 533x725px

Is op ded

>>62193728
I'm right here.

>>62193688
I do know CSS but while I know CSS I'm not like super good level either. But I do what I can.

File: .png (527KB, 1273x936px) Image search: [Google]

527KB, 1273x936px

damn. we need to go deeper

File: kek.jpg (52KB, 500x343px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 500x343px

>>62193749
>>62193749
kek guide us to the truth

>>62193749
what the fuck are you even doing at this point other than being stupid.

File: tumblr_nzmbqwiIuJ1qbvxwco1_500.jpg (69KB, 500x435px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 500x435px

>>62193796
you wouldn't understand kid, I'm diving deep into the net, and I don't care if my cortex heats up. you wouldn't understand anyway, it's a cyberpunk thing.

File: 4L_gMZB9jzH.jpg (71KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 800x800px

>>62193749
Pls continue

File: 4L_QBt0Wun1.jpg (88KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 480x480px

>>62193796
Post boi pussi

File: 7_proxies.png (662KB, 1066x907px) Image search: [Google]

662KB, 1066x907px

>>62193889
What's his endgame? Why did he turn over our data to the jews?

>>62193956
lolol

>>62193956
We're reaching cortex levels that shouldn't even be possible!

File: 4L_aesBnLz7.jpg (39KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 320x320px

I'm liking this thread

File: g.jpg (505KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

505KB, 2048x1536px

what did he mean by this?

>>62194074
HAHAHAHA wow

File: moot.jpg (530KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

530KB, 2048x1536px

>>62189828

>>62194140
>>62194074

Aren't you guys just creative.

File: nigga_thats_kawaii.jpg (34KB, 960x480px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 960x480px

>>62194140

Fucking miss Mootles

>>62194192
Tol you you fuckin goofed son. This is just the beginning.

File: op_is_a_faggot.jpg (172KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 960x960px

>>62194192
what are you going to do, baka? blacklist my tripcode from your new free speech forum? how much did (((they))) pay you??

>>62194263
I... am paid nothing for that site. That site is my passion.
And I find what you're doing to be hilarious.

File: 1411703494085.jpg (699KB, 2400x2400px) Image search: [Google]

699KB, 2400x2400px

>>62194244
Fucking why?

File: zing.jpg (85KB, 800x1007px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 800x1007px

>>62194275
>That site is my passion.
referring to the nulemonparty >>62193610

>>62194370
hahahaha!

>>62194074
Make one that says "traps aren't gay"

>>62194275
Bao?

>>62194244
neomoot > moot.

>>62194401
Not me. I am Sebastian. Thats the registrar.

File: notafraidtoTEMPLATE.jpg (545KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

545KB, 2048x1536px

>>62194380
Here's a template

>>62189828
where is the fucking source you faggot

also your domain name is terrible.
there is this thing called sub domains.
use them.

File: IMG_9880.jpg (85KB, 600x603px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 600x603px

>>62193956
>>62194263
>>62194428

>>62194435
what source I am the source. I hand coded it using a code editor in PHP, HTML, CSS, Javascript and made that site.

File: IMG_9882.jpg (73KB, 1242x1420px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1242x1420px

>>62194457
sabastion you're a faggot

>>62194466
You spelled my name wrong.

>>62194457
are you a fucking retard?

Server: Microsoft-IIS/8.5
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
X-Powered-By-Plesk: PleskWin

ya never mind.

>>62194473
stop censoring my gender you fucking gay nigger


>>62194483
ahahhaahahahahahahahahah

File: IMG_9883.png (3KB, 448x357px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 448x357px

>>62194457
>>62194483
koding wid klossy xddddd

>>62194483
>>62194533
As I explained. That is a godaddy server.

File: very autistic doggo.jpg (164KB, 1400x700px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 1400x700px

>>62189828
>one stamender
What's a stamender? Is that like a salamander?

File: 1st place.jpg (156KB, 350x350px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 350x350px

>>62194560
You came in one'sd place for the brilliant feedback.

>>62189828
how do you deal with illegal (including potentially copyrighted) content being posted to your website? you might get fucked in the ass.

>>62194585
So it is in the writer's responsibility for what they post. Keep in mind at the same time we keep no data on them making it impossible to hunt someone down. At the same time if something gets flagged or there is a big legal problem it is as simple as taking down the article if it warrants it.

File: IMG_9886.jpg (37KB, 424x366px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 424x366px

>>62194585
don't speak to sebastian-chan that way he's neomoot now he kodes php :ddd

File: IMG_9887.jpg (66KB, 300x199px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 300x199px

>>62194602

>>62194616
>no argument
>time to go to my autism jpg folder as reaction
Sure showed me.

File: notafraidofTRAPS.jpg (568KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

568KB, 2048x1536px

>>62194380

>>62194425
Sebastian what? I want to add you on Facebook. I've got a few ideas for this platform

I suggest a rule change:
"Everything is ok as long as hosting it won't get me literally v&"
Do you host images? No? Then there's no need for rules.

>>62189828
>having to confirm every rating
>after confirming a rating for a writer, the user is left on a blank page
>clicking back takes them to a broken page
>needs more navigation I can click around on

>>62194639
unfortunately I am trying to attract a large crowd. Not just 4chan people. Otherwise this would be fine.

File: IMG_9888.gif (24KB, 266x200px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 266x200px

>>62194074

>>62194634
LMAO

alright op, show me your battlestation, headset, keyboard, and empty your pockets on the table. that way I can know for sure you're a /g/ent.

File: 1494460151560.gif (897KB, 800x430px) Image search: [Google]

897KB, 800x430px

>>62194634
topkek

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-31 at 9.58.24 PM.png (73KB, 734x460px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 734x460px

>>62189828
Don't hijack native browser editing controls like this.

Also, your whole website is dolled-up Web 1.0. You need to AJAX this shit up.

>>62194696
I don't know Ajax so that makes sense.

File: IMG_9889.jpg (40KB, 500x408px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 500x408px

>>62194624
>dilusion faggot using godaddy's website builder
>retarded as fuck domain name
>shared windows hosting
>doesn't even have a functional site
time for bed sebastian, when mom finds out you charged her CC to godaddy she's gonna be mad

>>62194718
You assume I didn't write the php. the sql engine... took absolutely nothing and made it something. No. No website builder. Just the godaddy server hosting and the domain.

I am also 28.

>>62194670
>the only point of my website is unrestricted free speech
>I can't allow opinions that are too controversial
wat

>>62194735
but how did you fuck up this badly using website builder??

File: 4L_Wn4V1a3X.jpg (523KB, 2552x1024px) Image search: [Google]

523KB, 2552x1024px

Everyone give a go at which one op is

>>62189828
Put some attention in the design, the site still looks like babby's first attempt at Bootstrap.
- Decide one color and font for the interface, logo and design. I think orange is a good bet.
- Create an extended version of the logo, with the name of your site included, so your favicon and 32x32 logo is a small form of it.
- Make it an HTTPS. A good amount of your possible users can be pretty autistic in having an encrypted connection or not.
- I tried to click the 'Gaming' category link, but it took forever and finally it threw me a 500 Server Error.
- Category icons as they are are a bad idea, people has to scroll too much. I suggest some CSS magic to make some hover animations.

>>62190479
The black is ugly. Either go another grey or something lighter

Bump for interest

>>62189828
This is a good initiative op and I hope this will work in a way or another.
Also, I'm in France and the website is very slow to load at a point it makes it unbrowsable.
I think this kind of concept already exist, in France there is Mediapart, which is a want to be free media. But it's not anonymous.
Are you not afraid that anonymous newsing could lead the website to just be use in the wrong way, like spreading fake news to spread a political influence?

>>62189828
did you learn html and css yesterday? also dont tell me you wrote this in pure php becasue since you are obviously noob faggot i cant imagine how shitty that code is

>coder
Stoped reading

>>62196493
I feel like people won't want to share their opinions if they are tracked.

Also OP here. I am amazed this thread is still up I went to sleep for 6 hours...

>>62196493
there was a script I had loaded to replace images that aren't loading properly with a default image. This caused the pages to load very very sluggish so I will have to find another method or re-code the generic page to allow faster loading. I'll see what I can do.

It seems like categories are restrictive, tags might work better. A "trending articles" list would also help promote popular content.

>>62190221
>t. 16yo fluffneck

>>62198560
t. 20yo CS student
Also what's a fluffneck?

File: IMG_9891.jpg (192KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 960x960px

>>62199471

>>62193107
>It's only a matter of time before that pendulum swings back
that's already happening in germany, i.e. linksunten.indymedia.org

Made an account, thanks.

>>62190120
Why are you using Plesk on Windows? Fucking mad man.

>>62189828
That's a pretty neat website you have there.

>>62199907
Believe it or not plenty of web servers run off of a Windows environment. These techies who haven't had an actual tech job involving servers think that servers are all run on Linux as a majority when the reality is it is not.

>>62199921
T'thanks anon.

>>62189828
It's so easy to make websites look presentable with Bootstrap, but your website looks like shit. Also, that is a garbage domain. Are you 12 or something?

>>62200180
hoho he's so edgy nice man good response.

Do you do hand code?

>>62190968
How old are you? Don't take this as an offense.

>>62191101
Op, the design looks bad, but that's really fine. Don't let anons bring you down, your spirit is in the right place.

>>62200460
28.

>>62199971
I work for a web host, if you're hosting on a windows server with a control panel you're just wasting resources.

>>62200192
I hand-coded God's temple from scratch, you fucking nigger.

>>62200738
right.

>>62200722
Tell godaddy that not me. I'm sure they have no idea what they're doing.

File: true_faggot.jpg (676KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

676KB, 2048x1536px

Sebastian is off to a great start

>>62192674
>>62194603
>>62197327


What is this 'php is bad' meme? I want to hear a legitimate reason as to why it's shit. If you haven't coded in it rest assured your opinion doesn't count at that point. Are you legit telling me some node.js is going to outdo the serverside PHP coding?

File: aaay.jpg (66KB, 695x475px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 695x475px

url should be:
>http://firstspeech.am/
template should be:
>see image
site works:
anonymous users submit topics, they are shown on the front page based on an internal ranking algorithm which weighs clicks, time spent on page, time since last post

no images, text only, simple one page design (endless scrolling down until running out of content), clicking on a heading unravels thread down, only loads it to bottom of page, scroll down to reveal more of it)

instantly usable on mobile platforms, let users figure out a cloud service for sharing non text content, never waver from your original minimalist design and no censorship or moderation principles.


when you go public for 5 billion dollars, i will contact you for my 2 million USD payment with this message:
"gary sucks dick, account number: XXXXXX" where X will be my bank details so you can deposit the money.

>>62201287
>able to tell how long someone specific people spent on a page.

So... they're data mining? How could they do this without taking data from you to target you?

>>62201287
these are good suggestions OP. Please at last get a different name.

>>62201319
you simply time the difference between the click on a heading and the scrolling down away from the thread/ click on another heading. you track by ip,

>>62201386
ip tracking...?? how is that not data mining?

>>62193068
Nice eyes

>>62201749
t'thanks anon <3

>>62201287
the name is in reference to the 1st amendment of the U.S.A. constitution. Its the one that labels freedom of speech. If your not from the U.S.A. it may not make sense.

>>62201782
... obviously.

it's a play on words;
free speech
first amendment
first speech

did the dot am not give it away? atm first speech doesn't mean anything, i am inventing a new thing by combining two words that you don't hear combined.

>>62201817
I dont know the name seems fine to me.

How can you handle being bullied so much OP, I would have quit long ago if I was in your shoes.
Also your website's layout is autistic and won't attract anyone

>>62202778
Eh. It's how 4chan is man. It's not really a big deal.

>>62202778
>Not node.js AUTISM ALERT
>It's PHP AUTISM ALERT
>It's a Windows serverrrrr REEEEEEEEE
>IIS REEEEEEEEEEE
>THE DESIGN ISNT EXACTLY WHAT I WANT BUT AT THE SAME TIME I DON'T KNOW WHAT I WANT AND IF SOMEONE PRESENTED ME WITH ANYTHING I WOULD REJECT IT REEEE
And I'm supposed to be the autistic one. Yeah. Alright.

pretty interesting concept

8/10 support its continuation

>>62204608
Thanks anon!

File: 1503880691166.jpg (35KB, 500x265px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 500x265px

>>62191075
>it shoes
>shoes

>>62189828
>Be PHP
Stopped right there.

File: urafaget.jpg (370KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

370KB, 2048x1536px

Keep it up OP.

>>62194428

>coder

fucking kys

File: faggot_nigger.jpg (78KB, 976x549px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 976x549px

What's his endgame?

>>62208252
nice.

>>62201261
>some node.js is going to outdo the serverside PHP coding
Using PHP is literally throwing money away.

File: requests-per-second.jpg (55KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1280x1280px

>>62208669
Forgot the image.

>>62189828
>php
>coder
Sounds about right

thanks for posting the constructive article /g/.
https://1stamender.com/article.php?articlenumber=1281

And my response is this:

Not a bad article. And you have some valid points. I would also like to say that it is painfully apparent that right now your favorite social networking sites are attempting to silence people's speech actively. Make people feel isolated and alone... or outright banned in whatever they want to preach. 1stamender doesn't do that.

1stamender doesn't also isolate people in their belief system. It blends it in with everyone else. This inherently stops the echo chamber and allows people to obtain multiple view points. It would only get better and better as more people flock in. These are just my opinions though.

The sentiment is nice, but Steem is decentralized (censorship resistant) and incentives posts with payments in Steem.

>code
Did you meant artisan?

>>62212401
Steem?

Why not just make it like 4chan frontpage with the topics but have "trending"/"popular" articles in a little feed below it? Have a bar at the top with the topics too like here.