http://www.coolenjoy.net/bbs/27/1608222
This is outstanding overclock for an 18 core chip, I just wonder what the power consumption is stock and overclocked.
>>62187588
http://www.coolenjoy.net/bbs/27/1608912
He hit 4.8 GHz on the same chip. It's golden silicon. Expect actual retail samples to vary significantly.
>>62187606
Temperatures are actually good. What did he cool it with? I'm impressed, if only the price was a little bit lower but this is HEDT so I shouldn't be surprised.
It's the Intel CPU cycle, as usual.
>Intel promises huge percent gains over older CPUs using fudged Sysmark results
>"Leaked" clockspeeds are well in excess of anything remotely sane
>Golden silicon gets seeded to OCers who proceed to show off unrealistic pre-launch results
>Intel hype is now at maximum, shitposting shills everywhere
>CPU releases, it's an overpriced spaceheater with the exact same silicon lottery you'd expect
>Repeat ad nauseum
>>62187682
>What did he cool it with?
We don't know
>if only the price was a little bit lower
The 16 core is "only" $1700.
>>62187782
Damn. But that is AVX load. AFAIK AVX is performed at base clock so this would be unrealistic.
OH MY GOD LEAKS GUYS