Is it the future?

>>62186716
It's just a Chromium reskin like Opera.

>>62186716
its even more botnet than chrome

>>62186716
>chromium
how can anyone trust chromium to be free of goolags faggy hands?

>>62186743
>>62186766
>>62186836
What do you guys use?

File: 1497996871915.png (192KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 500x500px

>>62186716
>Brave
>Being the future

All of my keks.

Get the fuck out Brendan.

>>62186973
pale meme

File: 1502791007136-a.jpg (211KB, 1600x1600px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 1600x1600px

>ANOTHER browser thread
Fuck you.

/g/ has negative information syndrome
they eliminate information but don't add positive information aka solution

Speak up fags, why is your choice better?

>>62186766
>open source
>faster than any other browser
>blocks ads by default
>19 different search engines

great on android. lackluster on desktop.

>>62187271
chromium was already compromised once during the ok google shitshow

why would you trust them to not do it again?

>>62187316
Pretty much this. On Android it's basically Chrome - Google (still a search engine option though) + Privacy features (adblocking, https everywhere, etc).

>>62187426
>phoneposter
/out/

>>62187486
retard of the day right there

it was on desktop too you massive faggot. why are you on /g/ when you're this retarded?

>>62186716
Maybe but not for me. Switched to Pale moon a good while ago.

File: DonaldDraws1504210231391.gif (2MB, 373x324px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 373x324px

Brave is the dumbest browser i've ever seen

>>62187752
why?

>>62187686
enjoy being able to use exclusively add-ons previously approved by (((them)))

>>62187187
Feel free to go start another phone thread.

File: Screenshot_2017-08-31-23-20-26.png (99KB, 480x800px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 480x800px

>>62186716
yes

>>62187824
I use a few plugins and never have problems.

>>62186973
Firefox 52.3.0 ESR.

I use Brave and the only thing thats missing from it is a few bits of customization. It needs to support some form of a theme and a few more extensions, something like a night viewer would be nice seeing as how the UI and every webpage is white for some reason.

waterfox masterrace here

inb4 fuck off alex

It already is the future on mobile.
On deskop it's the distant future. Really needs a lot of work but it's easily the most performant browser out right now.
Bless that asian qt for securing our porn habits.

File: flat,1000x1000,075,f.jpg (117KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1000x1000px

>>62186716
>>>Make
>>>America
>>>Great
>>>Again
Is this /ourbrowser/ /g/uys?

>>62188471
This. Fucking based

>creator of brave was co-founder of Mozzila and the very creator Javascript
>Forced to resign from Mozzila for right wing views

How is this NOT /our/browser?

File: 8e8f505eb19004330644776762db5470bde288550187fd08f6c4d268a1075ff6.png (1MB, 790x900px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 790x900px

>>62188578
It is

>>62186716
you are so pathetic Brenden, you take a shitty chrome fork with an (((optional))) scam payment system and do nothing but shill it on 4chan. why dont you just get a real job

>>62188665
>paying the users for viewing ads is a "scam"
um
>chrome fork
>performs better than chrome
um

Waterfox or PaleMoon
And why

>>62188743
Firefox
not autistic

>>62187752
dumb trumposter

It seems to me like they have shills that post here all the time. I was using it once, but now I'll never use it again because something happened that changed the browser font to some disgusting serif type font and even if I uninstall fully and reinstall it doesn't go away. Also, blocking surface ads and basic tracking isnt the only thing you should be worried about.

>>62188578
>How is this NOT /our/browser?
hmm could it be
>the very creator Javascript

/g/ isn't politics, back to your board, refugee

I'm using

Brave(future proof and huge potential)
PaleMoon(the best FF based browser for windows)
Iridium (best alternative to chrome)
polarity (most lightweight browser )
Epic Privacy Browser (for privacy obvi)
Comodo Dragon (to check unreliable links)

>>62186716
Just made the switch. Pretty good, just hope they get more extension support soon.

>>62186766
lol Mozilla shills are on their game

>>62189940
>I can't use technology

File: 1478745436177.png (131KB, 1843x999px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 1843x999px

>>62188471
BASED MAGA

File: i-wanna-see-u-be-brave.jpg (376KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

376KB, 1200x1200px

>>62186716
>>62187089
>>62187752

>>62186716
It's a future botnet

Brave ads for a stupid idea.

>>62192281
Nice try google

>>62192266
>future

Is Brave better than Vivaldi?

>>62186716
>what is qutebrowser?

Any input on why Brave isn't on FDroid? I'm a privacy faggot and prefer to get open source apps from there first if possible. Currently using Lightning but it crashes doing nougat split screen which I use sometimes on my 6p. Assuming Brave is built targeting newer Android OS's?

File: Screenshot from 2017-09-01 15-00-06.png (294KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 1920x1080px

>>62188471
>>62188578
Swapping immediately, didn't realise Brave was the redpill browser.

>>62186716
I just tried it out. It's alright but it's so fucking retarded in some ways. I can't organise my bookmarks or customise the start page at all and it can't even handle downloading images from Pixiv. It would be great if they hadn't made such stupid decisions.

>>62195715
does it really depend on all that garbage?

>>62197254
>12 dependencies
I don't see a problem. most of that list is the content of a font package.

>>62197273
>nodejs
>npm
why would a browser need those?

>>62187271
>>19 different search engines

WOW, I wish other browsers had search engines

>>62186743
Did you even use it? It's nothing like these two, Chromium and Opera are actually usable.

>>62187230
use lynx. javascript is for plebs anyway

>>62186716
>hey do you hate ads? our browser comes with a built in adblocker so you don't have to see-
>just kidding we block ads on the page and serve you ads direct in the browser. but you can trust us we're not like those other shitty browsers that sell you to advertisers ;)

>>62195660
It's not open source.

How about Konqueror?

>>62186743
>>62186766
>>62186836
>being this much of a mozilla shill
kek, mozilla is starting to feel threatened.

>>62198191
oh look, it's another retarded goolag faggot

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/06/not-ok-google-chromium-voice-extension-pulled-after-spying-concerns/

>>62198225
You're talking about a different browser there lad. Try to keep up, Brave doesn't have OK Google built in, nor did it ever.

>>62186716
>install
>oh look, unremovable addons
>uninstall

>>62198045
https://github.com/brave

>>62198045
Yes, it is.

>>62192212
>#fuckgeorgesoros
>#fuckmozilla
#redpilled
#woke
#1488 hitler amirite??

>>62198225
>posts article showing benefits of open source
>continues to fear monger about open source browser
You're sending mixed messages.

>>62198365
>>62198374
Gee, I looked everywhere in their website.

>Contribute to Brave!
>all about monetary donations

>>62198495
>I don't understand what open source means
kek

>>62198509
Nah, I'm just a blind dumb phoneposter. It's right there under "Trust".

>>62188743
Both are viable. Pale moon for pre australis and waterfox for up to date Firefox that doesn't phone home. I have both but usually use pale meme because it uses barely any memory

>>62187187
Got a version of this that hasn't been raped by compression?

>>62190649
>polarity (most lightweight browser )
This looks interesting, odd that it's windows only though.

>>62198328
>Brave is a chromium reskin
>Goolag has compromised chromium before
>Brave is potentially unsafe
It's not that hard

>>62198426
Am i? It's perfectly clear. While Goolag got caught that time, it shows they have no problem putting closed source botnet code in chromium if they think they can get away with it

Any chromium browser should be considered compromised

>>62199025
>Brave is a chromium reskin
No it isn't.

>Goolag has compromised chromium before
And because of open source got caught and reverted it. Brave is also open source. Feel free to substantiate your botnet claims with evidence. I'll be waiting.

>Brave is potentially unsafe
Everything is potentially unsafe.

>>62199058
>No it isn't
What is it then?

>Feel free to substantiate your botnet claims with evidence. I'll be waiting
Oh, so we're not using previous evidence of Goolag submitting botnet code into chromium?

>Everything is potentially unsafe
Yes but some more than other and chromium being a project where Googlag is a major contributor should be considered compromised by default since they could attempt to pull that shit again at any given time

File: file.png (65KB, 1439x985px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 1439x985px

>>62199058
>>Brave is a chromium reskin
>No it isn't.
AHAHAAHAHAHAHAH

>>62199133
Firecucks are this mad.

>>62199205
>projecting

>>62199104
>What is it then?
It's an electron fork.

>so we're not using 2015 evidence of Goolag submitting botnet code into chromium that was never in brave in the first place, and also hasn't been in chromium since its discovery in 2015?
Well, you are, I am not.

>Yes but arbitrary feeling based drivel
I see.

>>62199229
>fallacies - the post
not an argument shill

>>62199229
>electron fork
Brave is built on top of Electron. Electron is built on top of Node.js and Chromium. Therefore Brave is a Chromium reskin. Q.E.D.

>not using Firefox nightly

>>62197458
He's building it from brave-git.
....this is why we tell you to install gentoo ffs

>>62199240
>fallacies
I don't think you know what that word even means.

Your only argument is an issue that never affected brave, and has been resolved in chromium itself since mid 2015. You apparently don't know the difference between a fork and a reskin, and you seem to get triggered whenever someone uses google code anywhere, even if it is open source. You are screaming botnet with exactly 0 evidence for that claim. You are clearly shilling and should be ignored from now on.

>>62199286
You're an idiot.

File: Screen Shot 2017-09-01 at 16.01.57.png (247KB, 3440x418px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 3440x418px

>>62199314
Fuck off shill

I've presented evidence that chromium was compromised by Goolag

So far, i'm way ahead of you

>>62199339
>an idiot for stating facts
nu/g/

>>62199314
This. Firefox shills are just mad because Brendan Eich created Mozilla and his pet project poses a threat to their inflated share of the market.

In other words, firecucks BTFO

>>62199340
>I've presented evidence that chromium was compromised by Goolag
Again, chromium is not brave. Your 'evidence' never affected brave no matter how many times you're going to cite that 2015 article.

>>62199340
>web browser based on Chromium
>"it's a Chrome reskin hurrr durr because Wikipedia says it's based on Chromium!!!!"
>being this retarded

>>62199373
So prove it's not?

All evidence points to it being built on chromium and you're just spouting shit

>Eich gets kicked out of mozilla
>finally doesnt have to work on that piece of shit slow browser anymore
>creates best mobile browser
>on the way best desktop browser
goddamn mozillacucks must be fuming, classic anime revenge story

>>62199370
>>62199373
>make the ui worse and add an adblocker
>developer tools literally mention Chrome >>62199133
>not a chromium reskin

>>62199350
>everything that uses electron is a chromium reskin
>facts
kek

>>62199412
not an argument

>>62199412
Everything that uses Electron is literally a chromeless Chromium displaying a webpage.
You can't argue with that, it's objective facts.

>>62199398
Lol this. /g/ is so mozzed right now but they'll see the light someday.

>>62187230
firefox nightly is the only right choice

>>62199427
>chromeless Chromium
kek

>>62199436
It's just proof that they don't actually care about performance - it's all about brands to them. They'll stick by THE SLOWEST (post nightly too.. yikes) browser on the market purely based on brand alone.
/g/ just isn't the same anymore. It's not about merit or technical prowess, it's all brands.

>>62186716
>no granular script control
>no way to block specific ads
wow, what a great browser

>>62199454
Do you know what chrome means? It's the UI around the content.

>>62198495
They don't want your shitty code.

>>62199133
How old is that screenshot? I don't see any mention of chrome there at all.

>>62199475
Which is why chromeless Chromium is such a retarded way of putting it. It's electron, not chomium. You're a moron and you should refrain from posting here.

>>62186716
Seems nice, but I'll stick with firefox until I can get 4chanX and some kind of user script manager running on it. A dark theme/custom themes would be nice too.
Also as >>62199468 says. Specific ad blocking (both to block ads that the built-in ad blocker misses + for cosmetical purposes) is a must have.

>>62195715
>arch
>yaourt
>scrollbar
>gnome3
>redpill

this """"bait"""" is so bad I threw up in my mouth.

>/g/ is too dumb to modify a working mainstream browser to suit their needs

>>62199501
As old as the post. I installed it just to make that screenshot.
It probably won't show up again after you dismiss it until Chrome gets another notable devtools update.

>>62199521
I don't care how many coats of paint you put on it, the largest and most relevant part of it is still Chromium.

>>62199623
>reinventing the wheel when other browsers have all required features

>>62199133
>using windows
>muh botnet browser
You have bigger problems than your browser kiddo.

File: 1503546775731.png (347KB, 600x788px) Image search: [Google]

347KB, 600x788px

>>62187187
what the fuck else are we supposed to talk about here

if brave used a better adblocker, I would use it

only thing holding me back right now

>>62199644
>doesn't understand the difference between electron and chromium
>it's just coats of paint bro
/g/ in 2017

>ads are intrusive so we replace them with ours
>we won't track you though, promise :^)
Truly, a republican meme.

>>62199461
>It's not about merit or technical prowess, it's all brands.
This. Shilling happens in every single thread now. It's disgusting.

>>62199708
>ads are intrusive so we let you opt in to replace them with ours as a way to support us
ftfy

File: file.png (43KB, 1009x780px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1009x780px

>>62199703
>the difference between electron and chromium
A coat of paint.

>>62199774
>doesn't understand the difference between electron and chromium
>it's just coats of paint bro
/g/ in 2017

>>62199229
I think the Brave team is also forking Electron itself again because they don't have all the extension apis

I would keep an eye on Brave. Here is the extensions they are considering adding in the future, or just extension recommendations from their support forum. Pay attention to all the google related extensions, could be normie teir shit, but hopefully they don't have behind the curtain deals with the Goolag.

https://github.com/brave/browser-laptop/projects/1

Pay attention to what they add. Some jew was requesting this
>Not seeing CNN highlighted as fake news.
https://community.brave.com/t/annotate-fake-news/3419

I am glad they at least investigated adding vimium.

>>62186716
Once it adds themes and extensions
It's k for phoneposting tho

It's mediocre. Not terrible, mind you, but it lacks a lot of basic functions and I'm still not 100% sure if Google is able to access the data due to it being a Chromium based browser

>>62192212
>#fuckshills
lmaoing my butt off

>>62199650
>""""required"""" features

why not just tell the CIA where you live while you're at it?

>>62200596
>granular script and ad block control is honeypot
nu/g/

>>62200628
In Brave you can click the noscript icon in the address bar to allow individual scripts, but thats it for now.

The Brave team say they want to improve their adblocker, and in the end allow the user to use any chrome extension.

>>62200667
I meant individual script sources not scripts themselves.

What about Iridium

>>62201608
>chromium reskin

>>62186716

>no split screen support on Android
>future

>>62203470
>wanting split screen on a tiny screen
Why though?

>>62203523

>tiny screen

I've got a mi max 2

>>62201608
kek

>>62200408
It's not chromium.

>>62205332
It's a modified version of it, no?

The phone version especially is like that; it's almost identical to Chrome except for the little Brave Button on the right

>no extensions

Daily reminder that qutebrowser is once again safe and functioning. This is the meme browser of /g/ future.

>minimalist
>open source
>vim-like keybindings
>built in, hosts-based adblocker

>Links:
https://qutebrowser.org
https://github.com/qutebrowser/qutebrowser

>>62207342
posting from qutebrowser.
I like it a lot, the keybindings needed some work to better resemble muh vim workflow but it's usable.
I wished it had extensions tho.

>>62190649
>>62198893
>polarity
What the hell? How come I've never heard of this browser before? It's been around for 5 years apparantly, and yet this is the first time anyone here mentioned it

I smell shill and botnet

>>62207342
I wanted to use qutebrowser but I want full mouse navigation as well. Also, did they fixed the scaling for HiDPI screens yet?

>>62207342
>This is the meme browser of /g/ future.
I though netrunner would be the /g/ browser?

Icecat browser is superior in every way.