Someone just made a pull request to add a code of conduct to

Reject the request and ban the user.

>ThePatriarchy closed this 1 seconds ago
>ThePatriarchy added [kys] [sjw shit] [bloat] labels 1 seconds ago

>>62180874
Close it without comment.

>>62180958
And then get fired from my sjw tech job? Nope. I either accept it or I leave the pull request open, and never touch the repo again. Maybe I announce I'm abandoning it, but I walk away regardless. Fuck I hate it, but I have too much to lose.

Only those willing to commit professional martyrdom can fight back against them.

>>62181578
Maybe this is best. Close it, make no mention of it ever, do not respond to any inquiry about it.

>>62181614
>people abandon projects when code of conduct PRs happen for fear of industry witchhunting
>make a bot to mass submit PRs

https://www.rust-lang.org/en-US/conduct.html
>Please be kind and courteous.
>Respect that people have differences of opinion
>We will exclude you from interaction if you insult, demean or harass anyone
I believe Torvalds laughed if he read them.

But how it happened? Did they wrote anything or just made a PR with their fucking addition?

>>62180874
update my contribution wiki, close the topic with a comment "I don't accept pull requests from <insert appropriate slur>", then update the message so the right kind of people get riled up and generate a ton of publicity about my project.

File: 1475424149509.jpg (126KB, 480x608px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 480x608px

>>62181706
The PR requester is an individual who has made several minor previous commits and primary hovers around the chatroom and forum.

They declared adopting this Code of Conduct to be a requirement of any truly good FOSS project because project values and a healthy community (ie. inclusivity) is more important than code and goals

What do you do, anon?

>>62181707
and then you never get a job again in tech

>>62181614
You're either talking shit to create a scene or you're delusional. Nobody at work gives a fuck whether you ban some random for meddling with your project. Maybe it's different in Australia, but I literally refuse to believe anyone would ever give a single shit

>>62181763
SJWs have witchhunted people before for openly criticizing the concept of a code of conduct.

Right now the NodeJS project is having a bunch of drama that spawned from exactly that.

It damages your name, corporate diversity is more important than ever, companies like Google and Facebook are getting shit from the labor department because its all white dudes. Do you simply not pay attention to the modern day McCarthyism going on?

If you're a programmer/sysadmin in a non-tech oriented industry you're safe, but if you're in a FOSS project or an actual internet service company with like a social media department you're pretty fucked.

File: typical.png (4KB, 407x123px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 407x123px

>>62180874

>>62181830
>typical.png
made me giggle

File: 1496362935462.gif (148KB, 340x340px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 340x340px

>>62180874
>closed
>locked
go on with your life

>>62181823

Jesus christ. Not every fucking place you look has to be racially diverse. Sjw are just faggots trying to con free money from companies.

Rewrite it somewhat, so it states trannies or whatever will be accepted, but won't get any special treatment or something along those lines, enough of it to brew up a shitstorm, but not too extreme so I can claim it to be perfectly acceptable. Let the storm rage on for a while, then shut it down out of the blue. Remove the CoC because it draws attention away from working on the project, silence any following mention of CoC immediately.

Reject for harrasement.

>>62181823
Stop living in the states and doing webdev :^)

Be evil.

>>62181877
I'm in Vancouver, it's pretty scary. Especially when you do gamedev.

File: 1364636314760.jpg (72KB, 230x238px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 230x238px

My projects needs some marketing.

How do I create a SJW controversy so everyone will talk about it?

>>62181933
master/slave always works
even better if you color code the master as white and the slaves as black

File: 1477972464218.jpg (37KB, 720x404px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 720x404px

>>62181933
Write a post on Medium about how you're adopting No Code of Conduct (or make your own variant) in direct response to the ongoing NodeJS controversy. Write about that controversy and piggyback on the attention.

Make sure the SJWs who are currently fighting about Rod Vagg/Ashley Williams are aware of the post.

If you care about the project and want to keep it going, say something along the lines of "So far, we haven't had any issues regarding disrespect or inclusiveness. If such issues occur in the future, this may be reconsidered." Make it sound like a "things are currently going fine, so why mess anything up by adding this" feeling.

>>62181933
If you want your userbase to soley consist of fat virgin neckbeard NEETs, go for it
Just remember that first impressions matter

>>62182012
According to most people involved in SEO you need backlinks to rank higher in Google. And backlinks from established websites, like influential SJW's, are the most valuable.

>>62181877
COme to Australia brother :^)

>>62180874
>thank you for your concern but as this is a small/hobby/niche/independent/technical/whatever project that has had [no reported instances of abuse]/[few reported instances of abuse that were dealt with on a case by case basis] the resources involved in ensuring all contributors are upholding a CoC would be excessive and would detract from the rest of the project
that's all you have to do, politely decline, if you don't give a fuck about some sandnigger tranny making minority contributions to your project so they can abuse some power in upholding a coc then nothing lost, if you're a moderate to large sized project let your pr/marketing/whatever person deal with saying no, but if you want to go on an angry autistic tirade about cocs on twitter you're only damaging your position as the only people that give a shit about accusations sjws make are you and other people that have gone on autistic tirades, the types of people to make those accusations in the first place, and potential employers looking to avoid a pr nightmare, don't eat the carrot if you don't want the stick

>>62181731
I'ld say the project welcomes good behavior or whatever but this has nothing to do with the code and reject it. If they become noisy maybe I'ld let them put it on the wiki.

Reject their PR and put this instead
https://github.com/domgetter/NCoC/blob/master/CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
or if they really insist
http://code-of-merit.org/

>>62180958
This. Common sense should be enough

File: tmp_104891495818877609510323501.jpg (31KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 500x500px

What is the point of having a code of conduct? They all boil down to, "Don't be an ass," which should just be a given. They're literally just fluff.

>>62182592
it's the modern equivalent of forum mod or irc op for worthless individuals whose only goal is to exercise power, code of conducts are extremely open to interpretation to the point anyone reading contributors code/issues/etc can find something "wrong"
t. elitist forum admin and irc oper

>>62181830
>not a but
my fucking side lmao

Ask them to write tests for the Code of Conduct to verify that it meets its aims.

I've never understood the issue with all this CoC stuff.
Why can't you just respond saying that the only thing you care about is the project, and any personal issues between others must be resolved by themselves.

Call it a fascist directive and close as "triggering material". If questioned: Call anyone supporting the document a nazi false flagger trying to breed discord among our cause.

>>62180874
I ignore it. Free software doesn't mean I have to take pull requests from anybody.

reject with comment: suck my CoC

>>62184357
t.nazi

>>62184357
nazis like you should be punched, maybe you'll learn then

>>62181830
wtf I love Poettering note

>>62180874
Add a code of conduct, but make it something the opposite of what an SJW would want.

>>62185554
this would generate an even bigger shitstorm. Unless you aren't Trump it won't end well for you

>>62180874
what type of code of conduct? post it

>>62181681
>>make a bot to mass submit PRs
why are you posting this here! why! n-n-n-now im tempet to mass pr github projects

File: image.jpg (99KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1024x768px

>>62180958
This nigga gets it. The only winning move is not to play

>>62181694
>I believe Torvalds laughed if he read them.
The only problem I have with Torvalds is who will be able to run the kernel project like him after he retires/dies

>>62187751
maybe we can get Richard Stallman for the Job

>>62180874
Delete repo and move to a private repo

>>62187760
>Stallman
>running a meritocratic project without coding
>implying he won't die before Torvalds
>implying he ever shipped Hurd
lolno

>>62181731
>project values and a healthy community (ie. inclusivity) is more important than code and goals
what the fuck kind of logic is that?

I want my shit to work, I don't care if a nigger or a woman coded it

Edit the pull request and replace it with the lyrics to Eminem's "Criminal"

then merge it

>>62181731
I write the following code of conduct

${PROJECT} Code of Conduct

1. Abide by the golden rule
2. Conflicts between contributors must be solved between themselves and themselves only
3.  ${PROJECT} values contributions over personal interactions, if a conflict shall arise between individuals, they're as expected to abide by 1 and 2
4. ${PROJECT} values contributions over personal ideologies. Contributors are here because they want to help ${PROJECT} to be a technical success, not because they have an interest in a particular ideology.

>>62187902
Wow, fucking nazi

>>62187902
Actually


${PROJECT} Code of Conduct

1. Abide by the golden rule
2. Non-technical conflicts have no place in ${PROJECT}. Shall a non-technical conflict between contributors arise, it must be solved between themselves and themselves only.
3. ${PROJECT} values contributions over personal interactions, if a technical conflict shall arise between individuals, they're as expected to abide by 1 and 2
4. ${PROJECT} values contributions over personal ideologies. Contributors are here because they want to help ${PROJECT} to be a technical success, not because they have an interest in a particular ideology.

There

>>62187980
But I'm not even white

>>62187996
I'm triggered that you aren't including people of color and non cisgendered people in your CoC

Fucking nazi scum

>>62188010
>wanting me to segregating people by calling them out
try again

Make a Code Of Conduct that just says:
"Don't be a faggot"

>>62188062
>Alan Turing automatically out of the project
checked and keked

Code of Conduct:

All discussion must be about the project
Any conflict must be resolved with formal argumentation
Do not discuss other users


These rules will the strictly enforced

File: 1503374965675.gif (3MB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 720x540px

>>62188120
>Any conflict must be resolved with formal argumentation
I like the way you think

>>62188120
Any conflict must be resolved with a longsword duel.

I would write one with really bullshit points like

>no parts of this code should refer to terms about nuclear warfare
>you cannot use any variable or variables to kill someone or hack NASA
>you cannot index arrays from 1
etc.

Then ban those who express their dissatisfaction about it. It is a meritocracy and the merit is obtained by writing code.

File: disgust.png (567KB, 642x866px) Image search: [Google]

567KB, 642x866px

>>62188702
>>you cannot index arrays from 1

>>62188120

user1:
argument: ur commit was gay
premise1: ur gay
premise2: gays make gay commits

user2:
I concede

>>62188120
add

discussing this code of conduct will result in immediate permaban

>>62188767
Yeah, you have to index it from 2. Or more, depending on what animalkin/made up sexuality you feel yourself in the moment.

>>62188818
I figured that anyone attempting to make a change to the CoC would not be able to make a coherent formal argument for any horseshit additions.

You're right though, it needs to be a bit more watertight.

>>62188702
>ban who disagrees
literally hitler

>>62181614
Tell them their PR broke your code of conduct

>>62180874
link them to this thread

>>62189119
"We can argue about some autistic shit and get triggered over terms like "master/slave" or we can discuss code. If you want to do the former, there are websites for your kind like feminist frequency or Tumblr. I highly suggest you visit those."

:^)

>>62181823
>Google and Facebook are getting shit from the labor department because its all (((white dudes)))

>>62189179
>please put a trigger warning before saying the words (TRIGGER WARNING: RACISM)[spoiler]master/slave[/spoiler] in consideration of the readers who identify as people of colour.

>>62181731
>They declared
their opinion against your opinion. are you legally bound to it in any way?
i don't know on which platform you have you code, but they are free to make a fork and declare it a "safe space".

>>62181731
I'm sorry you have to deal with this bullshit

>>62189225
>master/slave
>racism
>implying only blacks were slaves
That is seriously bigoted and non-inclusive towards domestic servants and such.

Check your privilege.

>>62187751
There are ppl able to fill torvald's position.
They do it frequently when he is afk,e.g. vacation.

omfg this racist thread if I find this OpenSource Project I will write about it on my blog, then we will see who is the "cuck"

>>62181823
Yep this, I'm the parent poster of the guy you're replying to. I work for a prominent tech company that is very sjw oriented and was very vocal/influential on some important discrimination issues within the last couple of years. I applaud them for what they did, but at the same time I can read between the lines of internal diversity speak and I know that if I was somehow involved in a situation similar to the Ashleywilliams deal, I'd probably get fired.

They do not fuck around, you do something they don't like and you're out. There have been some public examples, I can't link them because I don't want to reveal where I work lol.

>>62189609
goolag. Well as long as you know about it you can avoid it

>>62187812
A regular statement from CoC pushers who want to kick people out is "code and commits are easy, people are communities are hard". Implying any programmer is disposable, but good "community members" are not.

>>62189573
Yes, but I can't shake the feeling that everyone stays in line because they know that he's coming back. What will happen when he isn't?
Also how has he managed to not be overrun by people asking for a CoC?

>>62191968

Nothing lasts forever, friend. They will make some sort of committee from his level 1 lieutenants and it will continue on for another 20 years until they die. Then it will be a SJW snakepit.

But a Unix like OS may not make that much sense on computer architectures 40 or 50 years from now.

>>62187751
>>62189573
>>62191968
Linux #2 is Greg Kroah-Hartman
He lives down the street from me and comes into the google office sometimes to chat shit with the director and take a look at some kernel things. He is a hardass like linus and would do a totally fine job keeping the bullshit out. You have to realize that linus would _never_ let his #2 or #3 guys be pussies.

>Somebody makes a PR to remove the word 'abort' because it marginalises black women

What do you do?

What does Linus actually do nowadays?

>>62192106
>But a Unix like OS may not make that much sense on computer architectures 40 or 50 years from now.
>quack loonix
>a loonix for quantum computers
heh, but I see you point.

>>62192119
>You have to realize that linus would _never_ let his #2 or #3 guys be pussies.
Never actually thought about that way. I guess the ball has been rolling enough to guarantee that everyone in the first three lines of command of the kernel as a bunch of hardasses that won't let themselves be push around

>>62181644
but this is how I deal with most inquiries at work

File: 1479209773447.gif (954KB, 285x235px) Image search: [Google]

954KB, 285x235px

>>62183582
underrated post

>>62192119
This! after reading some papers made by him, I'd say that he's just like Torvalds' son

>>62180874
Code of Conduct

1.You must swear an oath of loyalty to the precepts of faith of the Roman Catholic Church and profess them as the infallible truth of God
2.Breaking the Code of Conduct will result in immediate excommunication, which will be lifted after confession and penitence.
3.Perpetual failure to abide by the precepts will result in prosecution for heresy
4.No one shall be forced to do the manufacturing of pastries for inhabitants of Sodom.

>>62192149
scuba

>>62192170
Some journalist woman with an agenda asked if he was going to include his daughters in some way when he eventually stepped down. He said something like "They don't really like to program, so no."

>>62192283
Its funny because I think they are really close in age

Also gregkh uses arch. one of us. one of us.

>>62192399
>if he was going to include his daughters
>He said something like "They don't really like to program, so no."
>tfw Daddy Linus will never shit on you because left dangling pointers in your code
I wonder if he tried to teach them how to code and if he did, how'd it go.

>>62192438
probably? they are 21, 19, and 17

>>62180874
Reject it