Adnauseam bread

>>62178730
>how it changed your life for better
it blocks ads and collect porn

>>62178827
>blocks ads
*laughs in pihole*

>>62178730
I've installed it. But the counter is still zero, probably thanks to NoScript.

>>62178939
yep, its not compatible with noscript

>>62178947
I'm not disabling NoScript.

>>62178966
you could at least whitelist google in noscript, im 100% sure it doesnt have any ads with malware

>>62178989
I'd be willing to temporarily disable it if there was a website that could wrack up damage quickly and safely.

>>62178730
Web-ext version when

>>62178989
sure, disable the biggest ad server there is in Noscript. that is wise, sure!

why all of you alt-right idiots are this dumb?
at least the don dumped you so that he can actually work without you going reeeeeeeee behind him

File: 0447019986796910.gif (473KB, 500x361px) Image search: [Google]

473KB, 500x361px

>>62179030
you are a fucking retard, google doesnt need javascript for anything, you are literally sending search requests to them, they know what you are looking for

>>62179062
is that a reason to not block scripts and let your botnet run free?
not today,shlomo

>>62179030
>>>/leftypol/

File: 1503983701091.jpg (818KB, 2400x1800px) Image search: [Google]

818KB, 2400x1800px

>>62179030
/pol/ is pushing this in a big way you stupid faggot.
If there's one thing literally everyone, across the political landscape, can agree on it's that Google deserves to die.

>>62178730
what makes it better than ublock origin? how do i know it's not a botnet?

>>62179090
no, that's bullshit

>>62179102
It's built on top of Ublock Origin. All it does is simulates a click on the ads it blocks.

>>62178730
>they are serious with that free ad nauseam shit

>>62179074
>calls everyone he does not like commie
kys

i'm just not a retarded kekistani like your bunch who are shitting up the board since muh white male (Google had all the rights to fire him desu state laws, contract/CoC and him wanting to be fired) got dumped.
If any of your weren't only from pol you would know that here on /g/ people fought
corporations since the dawn of time and living a FOSS life is the right way, not becoming a botnet to fight a botnet!

>>62179102
it clicks ads and makes google suffer, its also open source, shills screech its malware but not a single one of them can point at specific code to prove it actually is

>>62179128
>everyone who says something i don't like is a shill
you are the cancer that keeps lowering /pol/'s discussion levels.
Don't start this shit here

>>62179105
But it's not. You're as likely to see an AdNauseam thread on /pol/ made by a commie or an anarchist as a fascist or a nazbol.
No one likes Google, everyone wants to see those capitalist kikes brought to their knees. Stop kvetching and start bleeding the beast.

>>62179102
It's just ublock but it clicks on ads in the background so Google loses money.

>>62179113
>>62179128
oh, that's cool, now i remember that i've seen this being mentioned before. one concern would be how easy it would be to get blacklisted so your clicks don't drain ad revenue. if you've played runescape, they're fairly good at detecting bots. just some randomization like not clicking every ad and clicking them at random times would help i think.

>>62179145
how else do you call people that defend google? who would even defend google if not shills?

>>62179151
>everyone is an extremist
ok m8

>>62178730
where is the /pol/ thread?

File: CnxL93_W8AAc7vS.jpg (102KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 1200x675px

>>62179165
I mean I guess not. But even in the basic bitch realm does anyone actually like Google?
I know conservatives don't. Nor libertarians (back on the extremist side, ancaps hate them too). Do liberals like them?

>>62179159
this is in general what people on /pol/ do
there is always a bogeyman or a shill to fight for.
No one likes corporations, especially one like google but not shitting up another board to tell people who breathe FOSS memes how to escape google is fucking retarded and you guys know that.

>>62179171
here (no antifa or alt-right allowed, only real nazis and fascists please)

File: 1483214930175.png (32KB, 684x940px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 684x940px

reminder to run this in separate browser for few minutes everyday
http://jsfiddle.net/codefag/3t9r045q/

>>62179205
What if I just run it all day while I'm at work? Will Google ban me?

>>62179218
At most you will start solving Captchas in the middle of the day

>>62178730
buch of retarded losers. google makes money mainly from ads. this is how they support youtube. and i bet everyone of you fuckers use it every single day. know that time you watched a lecture video or used google maps to find place you needed to go? you should be thankful to google.

>>62179234
No. Google is a blight and deserves to be destroyed.

>>62179218
no, but you will know if you get banned

>>62179240
>t. /pol/tard

>>62179246
Maybe. Wanna guess my ideology?

>>62179234
I did until they started killing youtube with "limited state."

>>62179252
antifa homosexual redditor?

Returning to the main topic, can someone explain how come it is faster than normal adblockers?
It seems counter intuitive because it seems to be doing more things?

>>62179234
yeah i sure want to watch video that are only approved by joos

File: 1503787647661.jpg (1MB, 1407x1575px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1407x1575px

>>62179265
Nah, but ironically those idiots are actually also on board with killing Jewgle. They hate them for being crony capitalists but hey.
Which begs the question of who actually likes Google and wants it to continue to exist. I don't actually know.

>>62179252
I don't know, but all ideologies are retarded, so I know you are too

>>62179294
Stirner pls

>>62179270
but youtube has a lot of lecture videos. you can learn pretty much anything. you are just mad because they don't let nazi videos to be posted.

>>62179157
just set it to block ads at 10-50% rate, its undetectable this way

>>62179269
it isn't

>>62179300
thanks good i watch exclusively isis videos, youtube is full of them

File: 1345919316126.jpg (13KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 250x250px

>>62179300
That isn't an inherent feature of Youtube, though. Anyone can run a video hosting service, in fact there are many others.
What a world we live in when basic bitch leftists will defend monopoly and what amounts to state control because the enemy are called Nazis.

>>62179284
desu i'm more of a microsoft guy and hate the google botnet on muh android a whole lot.
i don't want that shit script running on my machine at all. Now if we are talking about making it run on a network dns filter, when it can't do damage (gnu+linux) i would install it.

>>62179205
Just tried running it in Chromium. All it did was open up a different window with google's start page on it. Nothing else.

>>62179326
just run it on linux virtual machine

>>62179326
I don't know that it's any more harmful than uBlock, though. It seems to just be an added feature whereby you can tell the addon to click some of the ads it hides.
Some sort of script that you could continuously run on servers would be pretty cool though.

>>62179205
what would happen if I set up a few raspberry pis to do this 24/7? hell I could even hide them in various places such as businesses.
moving on further, what do you think about something that would randomly use a VPN or something to continually issue new requests with new IPs?

>>62179234
they're heavily politically involved, you wouldn't like it if they were nazis, same way we don't like that they're subversive communist jews

>>62179334
Did the window start searching for shit on its own?

>>62179321
>Anyone can run a video hosting
it is very expensive though.
youtube loses money because of that.

File: 1494046859179.gif (366KB, 716x402px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 716x402px

>>62179346
Internecine strife on the left should be encouraged and assisted, not countersignalled. Do you think Google is some bastion of right-wing thought?

>>62179335
nigga, i have a dedicated machine to do dns filtering and it runs linux, now how can i integrate both?
>>62179339
yea, it's always on so it's wasting power because it's not running at full power

>>62179359
Well, this is just our helpful way of making it lose more!

>>62179348
Nope. I clicked it a second time, and a window opened searching for HIPPA stuff. No adnauseam in the new window, and it just sat there on the first search.

>>62179343
every pi would have to run on different external IP, otherwise they could detect heavy traffic from single IP

>>62179371
you cant integrate this unless you have a DE and firefox installed, if you have them then just start it and leave

>>62179376
but the idea of going to a place like a college or public place for example and putting a PI somewhere and having it connect to their wifi?

>>62179392
I know there's some thing where you can run GUI programs in a fake X server. I used to use it to run Skype through bitlbee

>>62178730
what did the jews mean by this?

Where's a good place for google ads?

>>62179371
look into this https://pi-hole.net/

>>62179396
it would work, they cant ban by IP because they would ban all users

File: snip.png (146KB, 1381x900px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 1381x900px

>>62179421
that's what i am running dude, just don't see how i can make it do bogus requests while blocking

>>62179396
>>62179427
holy shit, if we hide small computing devices in random public places and run ad clicking scripts, then either they don't ban us and we fuck over their ad business, or they ban all public wifi hotspots and fuck over their ad business, win-win

>>62179454
yes, they cannot do shit to us, all we need is more people running this script

>>62179452
>ships with a dns logger that you can't turn off
>keeps logs of how many queries you make
this is a botnet

>>62179409
Anyone want to answer this, since that script page isn't working right?

>>62179496
Use TrackMeNot

>>62179062
>you use Google already
Most people here don't, other than /pol/tards and /v/ermins.

File: fucku.png (8KB, 558x216px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 558x216px

>>62179481
>>ships with a dns logger that you can't turn off
>>keeps logs of how many queries you make

it is a DNS server, are you retarded or what?
also you can disable the query logging, but then the web graphs won't work.
also
>botnet when it is not sending your data anywhere.
i fell for the bait right?

>>62179506
That doesn't answer the question I asked at all.

>>62179517
Google ads appear in google searches

>>62179519
I wish that the automated thing would work.

>>62179519
>Google ads appear in google searches
I forgot about that

>>62179519
>>62179652
ehow serves up anywhere from 5-11 ads per article. One of the top earners of google adsense.

Should I be making exceptions for "non-tracking ads" or not?

>>62179769
I don't. But I'm only using it on a chromium browser doing google searches anyways.

I just keep refreshing "how to make google lose money."

>>62179784
Better to use a specific search. I did "Turkey sandwich," and Boar's Head Cold Cuts came up, so I searched for that, and kept repeating.

File: fluke search.png (177KB, 1046x612px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 1046x612px

>>62178730
Jackpot.

>>62179918
care to turn off hiding ads? i want to see how this site looks with them

Why are we targeting Google so aggressively nand not Facebook and Amazon as well? Aren't they as guilty of the invasive advertising phenomenon?

File: fluke 2.png (235KB, 1361x678px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 1361x678px

>>62179949
Sure.

>>62179977
only 13 ads instead of 32?

>>62179990
Dunno what to tell you. When I search generic shit, I get 3 ads. When I search for a high end specific tool, it increases to more, but there is no guaranteed number. Sometimes its 13. Sometimes its 20. Sometimes its 32 (haven't seen higher than that yet).

>>62179977
>>62179918
Keep in mind that people pay premium to have their shit advertised for a specific search like that. Cursory research says that some companies pay up to 50 dollars per click.

>>62180006
I got 34 b searching "gaming motherboard" lmoa

>>62180067
Pretty good, anon. Is that consistent on every refresh?

>>62180091
No, I've tried it a few times now and my lowest was 16, highest was 39

>>62180107
Pretty good, but I know the Fluke 179 is a specific search that is both wicked expensive AND I'm getting up to 36 per refresh.

What's wrong with just blocking ads exactly?
>block ads and dont see them
>normalfags continue to see them and give sites ad revenue
>everyone gets to keep using the site for free

What do you think will happen to free sites if you achieve your goal of "killing advertising"? I always shill against adblockers to normalfags for this reason, someone's got to pick up the tab. Your moralfag crusading, trying to actively harm advertisers as well as trying to recruit more people into doing so, is not very beneficial for anyone in the long term. The short sightedness of this board never ceases to astound me. Enjoy paying a $4.99 subscription fee to use every site (which will necessarily entail surrendering your personal information in some capacity, as most sites aren't going to accept meme cryptocoins)

>b-but we want to hurt g-google!!
Talk about cutting your nose off to spite your face.

>>62180136
Ok. I'm only using it in Chromium, which I downloaded for this specific reason, and using it on Google Search exclusively.

NoScript carries the day everywhere else.

File: 1466111342935.png (167KB, 396x385px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 396x385px

>>62179977
i got 33 on this sentence

>>62180171
That's fine then

>>62180183
Yup. I'm simply attempting to break the supplier's trust with a single, specific advertiser.

>>62180136
we were blocking ads for 10 years, what changed? nothing, google only grew more. blocking ads does literally nothing to them, we need to do this if we want them to die

>>62180181
Better to use a specific, high end specialty product. Going by adnauseum's own advice.

Why would you want to destroy the ad economy though? What does it do to hurt you that can't be blocked?

>>62180207
nah, let the script do its work while i search things i need

File: 75225.jpg (201KB, 470x595px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 470x595px

>>62180233
for fun

>>62180240
I don't use google typically, but do whatever you like. I'm doing this to inflict maximum damage against a company I typically refuse to use.

>>62180294
>Let's destroy the thing that gets us "free" (as in free beer) shit for fun
That seems stupid.

>>62180233
Youtube Limited State. There is no real competitor, because its a net loss.

>>62180313
What?

File: 1501511986408.png (169KB, 683x686px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 683x686px

>>62180307
isnt this just beautiful?

>>62180318
Youtube limited state. Islamic war chants in the english language stay up and monetized, while talking about actual things happening regarding the migrant crisis in Europe gets your video removed from search, demonetized, unable to have comments, and the like/dislike bar removed, as well as a warning saying that the video is not suitable, asking if you're SURE you want to see it.

>>62180339
And what's the relation to this thread? What's the net loss? Or are you just angry?

File: 60223568.png (413KB, 435x435px) Image search: [Google]

413KB, 435x435px

i wonder how much longer can google survive all these script kiddies like me. its my 3rd day and i can do this all year

>>62180357
If they are going to be the arbiters of what is appropriate and what isn't, and not even use the guidelines that they set up for the users (Calls for war/terrorism are explicitly banned), instead picking and choosing what hits that state, then yeah, I'm upset, especially since there isn't any competition.

File: Clipboard01.jpg (19KB, 776x103px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 776x103px

>>62180382
wrong image lmao

>>62180392
Okay, I didn't ask for people who were just angry. Shut the fuck up you retard.

>>62180382
Google isn't losing much. They are only refunding roughly 10 percent of what's paid to them to advertise. That said, its destroying the trust of companies paying to advertise through them.

>>62180399
No, you asked why I was looking to destroy the ad economy. And, since I'm only using it against google, I answered in relation to that.

>>62180412
>And, since I'm only using it against google, I answered in relation to that.
No, you just said you hated youtube, not why you'd want to destroy the ad economy, or what you'd hope to accomplish with it. There's a lot of blanks in that that you refuse to fill in.

>>62180425
Not him, but Google owns youtube.
Glad I could fill that blank for you.

>>62180207
Yeah I'm getting the best results by searching for audio equipment and high end electronics

>>62180460
That's not the blanks you dipshit, who the fuck doesn't know that? It's also a single thing when I clearly used plural.
Seems like only retards use this addon.

Ignore the shills, most questions are answered in AdNauseam FAQ.

>>62180469
Then what blanks are unfilled, ad defender?

>>62180476
I'm not going to repeat myself for retards.

File: 1483614973703.jpg (1MB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x1024px

>>62180479
only one looking like a retard here is you

>>62180425
I don't hate youtube. I hate google, which is the only site I'm using it on.

>>62180496
That doesn't change anything.

>>62180425
Motive: Google are a bunch of cunts.
Goal: Hitting Google's pockets by reducing trust between them and advertisers.

Happy Mr. Brainlet?

>>62180503
it kills google

>>62180503
What doesn't it change? I want Google to die, so I'm not using any of their products except for youtube, and I'm searching for a 400 dollar multimeter over and over on Google's search to break the trust that companies have with Google.

There's the beginning and end of what I'm doing. 13-36 results for a high end specialty product, costing the company advertising up to 50 dollars per click, and refreshing the page after all the ads are clicked.

>>62180525
>What doesn't it change?
The argument obviously.

>>62180526
What argument? You haven't argued anything. You asked a question: why I'm doing what I'm doing.

File: 1468683408746.jpg (55KB, 800x530px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 800x530px

>>62180526
this was a nice bait

>>62180528
>What argument? You haven't argued anything.
Nice semantics. Really helps your case.

>>62180540
>semantics
Well, thanks for the bump anyways.

>>62180553
I didn't bump, I always use sage.

>>62180559
That's ok. I bump the thread when responding to you, so it all equals out.

File: 1484319628897.jpg (256KB, 1220x1088px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 1220x1088px

THIS THREAD IS ILLEGAL, DELETE IT

>>62180525
The Fluke 289 is a 540 dollar item. May as well go as high as possible on the price.

>>62180573
How is it legally actionable?

>>62179334
>>62179348
Same for me with Waterfox. Opened 2 windows, one with google.com without searching anything, other with one search, then it just say there.

>>62180610
My solution was to search for a Fluke Multimeter, and click the search button once every couple of minutes. The Fluke 289 is a $540 specialty product, which costs companies up to 50 dollars per click.

>>62180623
>50 dollars per click
dear lord

>>62178730
AdNauseum changed my life for the better by exposing the Pale Moon browser as being anti-freedom. I have dropped the use of Pale Moon, and will never go back. Thank you, AdNauseum!

>>62180610
I think Codefag mentioned something about needing to keep the new windows in focus or something for it to work. Also it doesn't work in incognito mode.

>>62180631
Depends on the ad, according to the app. I imagine its has to be exactly what you're searching for, super expensive, and include pictures for shit to go that high.

That said, I get anywhere from 10-33 picture ads per refresh, and 3 text ads per click.

>>62180631
https://github.com/dhowe/AdNauseam/wiki/FAQ#how-does-adnauseam-estimate-the-click-cost-it-shows-in-the-menu-and-vault

seriously guys, stop it, it doesnt hurt google at all, you are all just wasting your time

>>62180996
ok

>>62180631

CPC by Category


>Insurance - $54.91
>Loans - $44.28
>Mortgage - $47.12
>Attorney - $47.07
>Credit - $36.06
>Lawyer - $42.51
>Donate - $42.02
>Degree - $40.61
>Hosting - $31.91
>Claim - $45.51
>Conference call - $42.05
>Trading - $33.19
>Software - $35.29
>Recovery - $42.03
>Transfer - $29.86
>Gas/Electricity - $54.62
>Classes - $35.04
>Rehab - $33.59
>Treatment - $37.18
>Cord blood - $27.80

hot damm

>>62181027
werent top words around $200?

>>62181052
Those are averages

>>62181027
>>62181052
meanwhile content creators get a couple of bucks per 1000 views ($1-10 depending on the type of ad)

>>62179157
how do you know if you're blacklisted?

https://jsfiddle.net/icefrogcode/kqdx7cyb/1/

If I block everything and never register any clicks how are they able to build a profile about me?

The point of adnauseum eludes me still.

>>62179151
anyone who unironically starts siriusbiznis threads on /pol/ are retarded

>>62181226
by blocking you dont hurt google

Man I don't even bother with this, but I admire the impressive butthurt it's generating.

>>62179151
>It's just ublock but it clicks on ads in the background so Google loses money.
You're helping Google make money. Who do you think gets charged on an ad click?

>>62178913
pihole is shit and slowed down my connection massively, it's a huge pain in the ass to disable, etc. It's annoying and worse than per-client blocking

>>62181226
it dilutes the effectiveness of ads which is google's main source of income. the advertisers pay more for less so they get discouraged from running more ad campaigns. content creators also get less revenue so it won't be worth it to post clickbait videos on youtube. even the channels that don't get censored are moving on to different forms of funding like patreon and paid membership sites. so youtube will be an even bigger money drain for google when channels stop relying on the youtube monetization system.

File: aidsads.jpg (563KB, 1493x895px) Image search: [Google]

563KB, 1493x895px

>>62181226
The point of advertising is to get people to click on the links and go to their site.
For example, if Amazon pays google 20 dollars per ad click to their site, and they have 100 people click on their ads, they assume 100 people visited amazon.com right? They pay google 2000 bucks because thats what they agreed on.
But with adnauseum you are faking these clicks, and as a result amazon pays google 2000 bucks for nothing. This lowers the advertising businesses reputation and fucks everything up for them basically.

Look at the picture here, I've had this running along with http://jsfiddle.net/codefag/3t9r045q/ to generate fake clicks. do you think I've clicked on 571 ads? fuck no, yet it looks like I have, and these companies are paying google because of it.

>>62181290
Protip: Google will simply blacklist your address and the advertiser won't be charged for those clicks, or your CPC will be lowered massively.
>inb4 stats on the "average" CPC for the most expensive general categories

>>62181290

in addition to that, you have to realize that Google's primary income is ads.
according to this 90% of their income is in ads: http://www.bbc.co.uk/guides/z9x6bk7

which means if we hurt them on ads.. we really do hurts them a lot. This is like hurting somebody's sole product

>>62181303
is there any way to know when this happens?

I'm surprised no one has created a vm/container around this.
>>62181391
The "estimated cost" won't increase anywhere near as much.

File: Goo Gun Tutorial.png (833KB, 801x936px) Image search: [Google]

833KB, 801x936px

>>62179334
You have to enable pop-ups, disable other ad-blockers, and it typically does not work in Incognito/private. Easy instructions tutorial for Chrome/FireFox in pic. For Opera, below. With the built in VPN, I think it should be the goto browser for this (plus, I really like it as a browser, general)

Enable Popups: Opera icon (top left) --> Settings --> Website --> Allow all sites to show pop-ups

Enable VPN: Opera icon (top left) --> Settings --> Privacy and Security --> Enable VPN

Turn of Opera AdBlocker: Opera icon (top left) --> Settings --> Basic --> uncheck "Block Ads"

>>62181391
Not really, but it's pretty much a guarantee after a few days. After a couple of weeks of doing this you will be considered basically worthless by google's algorithms. 1 cent clicks etc

File: Google Script5.jpg (158KB, 744x501px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 744x501px

>>62179373
The latest version of the script is set with a long sleep time (60,000). Just change it to 10000 and 5000. Anything faster risks captcha.

>>62181478
you would have to route the traffic through Tor and somehow run a script that goes to the jsfiddle and executes it. While not impossible, it takes more time.

>>62181391
Ignore me, this is wrong >>62181478

for real guys. my adnauseam stops clicking ads it collects very regularly and I have to restart FF.
is this a known bug or are (((they))) to blame?

>>62179205
Reminder to create a dummy gmail account so you fuck up Google's analytics further. Run in opera for the built in VPN, or BYO-VPN for super-effectiveness.

>google high cpc keyword
>click next page about 15 times
>collect 7 ads each page
>solve captcha
>repeat

Am I doing it right? Can get hundreds of ads in minutes.

>>62180307
Their services are not free. You are the product.

>>62180610
There is a 45s min wait, plus a (random+60) wait. If you've followed the guide and allowed popups/installed plugin, just sit and let it run.

>>62181825
>You are the product.
Not if you block the ads.

>>62181854
Are you using Gmail? Your emails are being indexed and providing targeted demo information.
Are you using Youtube? Your watched and liked videos are being indexed and providing targeted demo information.
Are you using Google Drive or Photos? Your information is being scanned for guess what? Targeted demo information.
You're the product.

>>62181909
Thanks for the irrelevant to the thread and hypothetical situations in which using the word "free" is wrong. It really helps this conversation because it's not related at all!

>>62181955
not him but
>"I'm not a product if i block ads lol"
>ok, here is a bunch of situations where you ARE the product, even if you do block ads
>"lol thanks but it is not relevant xD"

>>62181496
Thanks!

>>62182052
You're skipping the part what the conversation is actually about, namely that using free services that are subsidized by just ads is "free". Adding additional variables will obviously change it, for example, subscription sites aren't suddenly free with adblock. But obviously those aren't the topic of the conversation unless specified.

File: 1445902293119.jpg (22KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 250x250px

>mushon zer aviv
>helen nissenbaum

>>62182111
Trips wasted on abject stupidity.
Ads are not the only means by which Jewgle sustains itself, you stupid faggot. They're a user data company as much as an advertising company.

>>62182137
>Ads are not the only means by which Jewgle sustains itself, you stupid faggot. They're a user data company as much as an advertising company.
I'm not saying google only sustains itself by ads? Learn to fucking read, I'm talking about sites that only sustain themselves with ads, which you know isn't fucking google.

>people shilling for google
what the fuck, also reminder to install this at your local net cafe.

File: 1501281627582.jpg (59KB, 680x678px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 680x678px

>>62182186
So in other words, sites that won't be harmed by this? The extension targets ad networks, other sites might even get more shekels for the hassle this will cause.
>>62182207
B-but the devs are commie Jews! Never mind that Jews fighting each other should be encouraged at all costs, just focus on the echoes goy!

Dumb /pol/cucks

>>62182242
>So in other words, sites that won't be harmed by this? The extension targets ad networks, other sites might even get more shekels for the hassle this will cause.
Where the fuck do you think these sites get their money from? From ad networks. If you destroy ad networks, they won't have money and will need to implement other ways to get money, most likely ones that aren't easily circumvented like ads, like subscription models.

>>62182186
Protip: use another ad provider for your website anon instead of shilling for google, personally I use amazon associates on my blog.

>>62179074
Fun fact, even /leftypol/ supports adnauseam. Google is in big trouble right now.

File: 1398930780279.jpg (46KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 500x500px

>>62182269
I'm literally 100% okay with that though. I'm happy to shell out for paywalls if people make content I like- I already do in some cases. Maybe without ads the legacy media will die a quicker death.
>>62182282
There's also this. There are less cancerous ad providers that I tend to whitelist, maybe you should use one of them instead of contracting with the Jew?

>>62182282
Personally I don't trust any ad network really. If you want me to see your shit you'll have to host it yourself. People already do this, so it's not impossible. Wouldn't amazon also be picked up by this addon though, and thus "destroyed"?
Besides, I don't have a website. And I don't like google, I just don't think it's smart to destroy ads like this. I'd rather have free shit with the click of a button than need to pay for the content that's now free.
>>62182324
>I'm happy to shell out for paywalls if people make content I like- I already do in some cases.
As do I, majority of cases I don't because their content isn't good enough to pay for but it is good enough to view for free. But fair enough if you're play with that prospect, I assumed more people would want free shit on here.

>>62182377
>Wouldn't amazon also be picked up by this addon though, and thus "destroyed"?
That's OK, Amazon needs to die as well. That's secondary to killing Google though.

>>62182436
Okay, so that's not a viable option either after destroying the things this addon destroys.

>>62178730
Can we instaal it on FF57 ALREADY?

>>62182436
desu Amazon is the least contemptible of the big conglomerates. At least the actual store and e-ink Kindles are worth keeping around.

>>62182377
Amazon associates is based on commission and is therefore completely immune to this type of attack also you clearly do have a stake in this fight not that it really matters.

If I clear my browsing history, does it clear collected ads as well from the vault?

>>62182489
>also you clearly do have a stake in this fight not that it really matters.
Wait, what? I don't understand what you mean.

>>62182267
Track me not and some random free vpn.

>>62182463
Nobody and nothing but google's reputation as an advertiser is hurt by this, presuming you just run the script.

Others may use it for other stuff, but my attack is focused.

>>62178730

I won't use Adnauseam if it doesn't also block ads for me.

>>62182664
It does

>>62182708

Get video ads on youtube, get shittons of ads on facebook.

I have yet to find an ad blocker that works on Facebook.

>>62182646
just to reiterate referral based services where a user buys a product and then the site owner makes commission can't be affected by Adnauseam. On the other hand services like google adsense that are based around collecting data on the users behavior outside of the actual sale are going to get shit on.

>>62182766
http://www.fbpurity.com

>>62182494
no, it is separate. and even if it wasn't, don't be autstic and do it.

File: Defenses Against the Dark Arts.png (715B, 34x31px) Image search: [Google]

715B, 34x31px

I gave AdNauseam a whirl because I found James Damore's firing to be unfairly discriminatory. However, the counter never increased and ads were simply being displayed regardless of settings even though I disabled uBlock Origin and later removed it from both desktop and Android Firefox. After two days, I reverted to uBlock Origin.

The (((developers))) are also an issue for me. My gut says this is an extortion attempt that is not viable in the long term for the purposes I wanted it for.

>>62183048
>tripfag
>"lol i dont get it it doesnt work xD"
>(((((meme)))))
it's like you looked at a redflag list before posting.

File: vacuum.jpg (169KB, 960x600px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 960x600px

I still can't get AdNauseam working in Pale Moon after I set block level to 3.
It says it's enabled but it doesn't block ads nor does it have the icon in the toolbar.

>>62183048
You don't extort with open source code.

>>62179119
>literally calls someone he disagrees with alt-right
>gets called a far leftist based on this
>gets triggered
what?

File: file.png (305KB, 437x916px) Image search: [Google]

305KB, 437x916px

>>62182664

Check your lists.

>>62179513
Google is unarguably the beats search engine because its trained to know what you want. So not only le pol nazi strawman uses Google but anyone who's time is valuable at least partly uses Google.

>>62184061
and google has also been on a rampage of censorship and firing of anyone who disagrees with their empire. This is a good way to get back at google for this kind of bullshit.

>>62180199
Who gives a shit, though? I don't care what's going on with ads because I block ads.

>>62184138
true but I want replacement.

>>62182267
adnauseam alone should be enough

>>62183048
disable noscript

>>62184278
I don't use it. The only addon common between my desktop and Android Firefox is HTTPS Everywhere. Admittedly I didn't test disable it.

>>62178730
Still at zero. Probably because I checked the box which says to fuck with only tracking ads and browse on firefox with DNT on, etc. I don't really know what the left or right opinions on this is, I just think it's fair.

>>62181290
>>62181280
>>62181253
Awesome, thank you that clears things up for me.

>>62184161
who gives a shit if you block ads? literally no one

Is it true that they can get your IP blacklisted from accessing the internet for using this?

The gui for the extension doesn't work for me. I can't click on "settings" or "view ad vault," or at least when I do click on them, literally nothing happens. Using Waterfox.

>>62185003
completely false, they cant do shit

>>62185053
Have you tried turning it off and on again

>>62178730
>best Ad blocker
>litterally ublock plus maleware clicker


You are dilusional

>>62185084
Yes. Still doesn't fucking work.

File: 1499961633766.jpg (126KB, 808x820px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 808x820px

>>62185245
>>62185245
keep crying bitch nigga

File: Untitled.png (81KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1600x900px

>>62178730
Nah, nothankyou

The goal of Adnauseam is to remove tracking ads from the web, correct?

>>62185626
The goal is to make them useless by filling them with fake data

How does the "clicking" work?
If an ad has a malware dropper or redirect will it cause the redirect?

>>62185938
google doesnt have such ads, thay also dont have malware in them so its perfectly fine to click on all of them, of course you dont want to click everything because they will catch you

File: 70870718055238286.jpg (183KB, 374x578px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 374x578px

i just thought about a way to defeat adnauseam, checked source code and it indeed is would work, what should i do? tell google or tell jews behind adnau?

>>62186008
>because they will catch you
And do what?
(Can they actually ban you from YT, GMail and the like?)

>>62186365
flag your click invalid probably
and then your click wont matter after that

File: 4264699045202.jpg (42KB, 576x386px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 576x386px

>>62186365
nah, all they can do is force you to solve capcha, but do you want solve capcha every few minutes?

>Install uBlock Origin on personal lab machine
>For some reason not actually blocking ads
>Install Ad Nauseam
>Does the job perfectly

Explain this.

>>62186416
they cant do that because they know that there are hundred of legit people that have the same IP as you, they would block all of them and they sure dont want to do that

>>62186445
maybe you are not using good lists

>>62178730
>>>/pol/

File: Clipboard01.jpg (9KB, 287x158px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 287x158px

>>62186086
just kidding, i have emailed the issue personally to this guy using russian email, lets see what will this jew say about it

File: 1484488815379.png (2MB, 991x1426px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 991x1426px

>>62186553
>>>/reddit/

File: REEEEEEEEE.jpg (50KB, 545x440px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 545x440px

how about we post out stats?
>high as fuck timeout
>low rate clicks
>~15 hours a day
running this for 3 day now
LET THE GOOGLE HIT THE FLoOR

>>62178730
What do you people hope to accomplish with this? This isn't going to make ads go away. All this is going to succeed at doing is making companies realize that they need reverse proxy services that disguise ads and other 3rd party requests as first party requests like Instart Logic already offers which will completely break all host based controls (adblockers, Noscript, uMatrix, etc.). Not to mention we've already seen how games have gone when it comes to fighting bots/hacks, and how it's just resulted in regular users being the ones who get fucked over. An entire economy isn't just going to roll over and die this easily.

File: 1476048593912.png (176KB, 658x545px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 658x545px

>>62187724
ads will stay, hopefully google wont

>>62187724
Good, then I will get some challenge.

>>62187734
>a fortune 50 company worth hundreds of billions of dollars is just going to roll over and die because they encountered a minor road block that other services have already been dealing with for over a decade
Are you retarded?

File: 9561702.jpg (132KB, 1862x816px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1862x816px

>>62187804
>minor
tell your boss that im installing this on every single laptop that i get my hands on

>>62179028
literally never

>>62187804
>Are you retarded
He frogposts apu apustaja.
That tells you all you need to know.

File: 978798252096.png (26KB, 396x400px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 396x400px

>>62187916
>>62187804
samefagging doesnt help you as much as you think it is

>>62187833
Video game companies have over a decade of experience in fighting bots that could be applied to fighting this, and there are already companies offering reverse proxy services that would make doing this significantly more difficult, will break all currently existing ad blockers, and will irreparably break all script controls beyond a simple global on/off switch. Adnauseam is a relatively small issue compared to other problems a tech company could encounter. Nice nigger tier logic you have of attacking a target without a single thought of how they could fight back. Protip: the industry response to this will be comparable to commencing the day of the rope in response to a single nigger who decided to attack someone with just their fists.

File: 1478899987176.jpg (57KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 250x250px

>>62188063
are you fucking serious? i can speed hack in the biggest mmo in the world without anyone noticing it, game devs are fucking retards and will only ban you if you hack inside dalaran while everyone is recording you, you are literally this retarded. google cant diferentiate between user, all they can do is log IPs, but there are thousands of legit users uner thae same IP and i can change IP any time i want, theres literally nothin google could agains me, they will not ban all 10000 usrs that are under my IP, they literally cant do shit to me, literally nothing

>>62178730
Can some one explain to me how this is not illegal?

>"economic terrorism" would be undertaken by transnational or non-state actors. This could entail varied, coordinated and sophisticated or massive destabilizing actions in order to disrupt the economic and financial stability of a state, a group of states or a society (such as market oriented western societies or economies) or a trading exchange for ideological, monetary or religious motives.

Are you guys not intentionally trying to damage the global advertising market through a loosely coordinated attack on google ad-sense?

Even the program on its own is intentionally creating fraudulent clicks in a way the violates google ad-sense terms of service.

Whats the difference between doing this and spamming someones server or ordering 100 pizzas for some ones house?

File: pihole.png (17KB, 287x464px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 287x464px

>>62181278
>it's a huge pain in the ass to disable
what

File: 1469556309405.jpg (59KB, 447x386px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 447x386px

>>62188156
>will only ban you if you hack inside dalaran while everyone is recording you

>>62188193
the difference is that the pizza boy isn't stalking me.

>>62188156
>but there are thousands of legit users uner thae same IP
Not at the same time for the vast majority of internet connections.

>they will not ban all 10000 usrs that are under my IP,
They wouldn't IP ban you. They'd simply temporarily blacklist you (so no other users get caught if you change your IP address), and extend the blacklist time as long as they continue to detect someone from that IP address continues to use an addon like Adnauseam.

>>62181278
>pihole is shit
Objective but you're entitled to your opinion.
>and slowed down my connection massively,
It's a DNS forwarder that runs on a Pie computer. There is no way this is what is slowing down your network. I run mine in a Ubuntu server VM and have never seen it hiccup once.
>it's a huge pain in the ass to disable,
Change your DNS forwarder to something else. Done.
>It's annoying and worse than per-client blocking
It blocks ads for stuff that you cannot put a client on plus makes the job of client based blockers easier.

>>62188399
>It blocks ads for stuff that you cannot put a client on
What piece of shit like that would you be using today?

File: 6062160160325729.jpg (316KB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 2000x2000px

>>62188378
nice memes but
>Not at the same time for the vast majority of internet connections.
how can you tell? people are switching IPs all the time, and not because they reset their routers, but because their ISP changed it, this is not a sometimes thing, this happens all the time, how can you differentiate between users?

>They wouldn't IP ban you. They'd simply temporarily blacklist you
lmao, how would that even work? storing info in cookies? that literally all they can do,if they even detected you in the first place. im clearing cookies every hour, tell me how they can tell that im using the script? this shit is so funny, you are just making random sentences hoping someone will fell for them, but too bad, this is not facebook

This sounds good in theory but I really can't believe that jewgle doesn't have countermeasures for something like this already. I mean people spam clicked ads in the past to make a quick buck all the time and this is effectively no different, except for the fact that you aren't making any money by doing it

>>62188193
>Even the program on its own is intentionally creating fraudulent clicks in a way the violates google ad-sense terms of service.
Wait, I never agreed to these terms anyway.

>>62188460
Any IoT device. For example, a PS3 makes an ok HTPC and now it doesn't have ads.

>>62188479
>storing info in cookies?
Do you know how I know you haven't done any reading on the subject of tracking users for about a decade?

>>62188482
>This sounds good in theory but I really can't believe that jewgle doesn't have countermeasures for something like this already. I mean people spam clicked ads in the past to make a quick buck all the time and this is effectively no different,
Ad providers responded to those people off by blocking them from using their ad service.

>>62188534
So do a ton of other inexpensive options that aren't completely gimped, and IoT devices are shit that you shouldn't be purchasing anyways.

File: 1493268345764.jpg (13KB, 190x250px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 190x250px

>>62188664
>>Do you know how I know you haven't done any reading on the subject of tracking users for about a decade?
yes, actually i am interested, tell me about my user profile, tell me how they know who i am, i am waiting

>>62188664
>So do a ton of other inexpensive options that aren't completely gimped
Name one that would work on a device such as the PS3.

>>62188533
Yes, but you are framing some one else for doing so.

This software will likely get many sites flagged for committing click fraud.

There's nothing wrong with Google. Their motto is literally "Don't be evil". Please seize this act of economic terrorism immediately.

>>62188693
>Name one that would work on a device such as the PS3.
Try reading that post again.

>>62188741
So you can't think of one then?

>>62188700
So, the websites that host these ads have a terms of service that says that fraudulent clicks aren't allowed, and somehow the conclusion is that any fraudulent clicks is from the website? I'd hardly call that framing, considering there's no actual evidence to point to the website, or any effort on audnasium's part of trying to shift the blame.

File: 983776685201723056.jpg (3KB, 101x119px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 101x119px

>>62188741
hey nigga, i was first in reply chain >>62188692, answer me

>>62188776
They are the defacto suspect of click fraud because they have motive.

>>62188804
As do the people in this thread.

>>62188706

Clicking on adverts is by definition a responsive action. Responding as quickly as the server can send me adverts cannot be an act of spam or flood attack because that would make your server the attacker and the clicker the victim.

If clicking on adverts more than a number in a certain period is illegal, why would sending the clicker at least the equal number of adverts in the same time period legal by the same logic?

By any measure and by any definition of the law, clicking on all the adverts all the time is not illegal.

However Google might be committing click fraud by knowingly send out adverts to the same person before he can reasonably click a second time. That is, the technical method of how Google display their advert is flawed, but they still
charge advertisers by number of clicks, not by the more reasonable measure of how a normal person who intent fulfil the purpose of the advert, i.e. clicking and then proceed to become a customer brought in by the clicking action, would need time to complete said action and therefore complete the purpose of the paid advert, therefore the risk of displaying adverts during this time when a person is still completing this process triggered by an earlier advert he clicked, lies solely on Google alone as it is a completely understandable, foreseeable and preventable risk that the commercial model that Google choose to follow carry. In other words, it is a risk that originates from Google's however justifiably flawed technical method of serving adverts that Google decided to accept by adopting said flawed advert delivery method of the flawed model of advert commercialization.

Therefore Google may be committing click fraud (towards the advertisers) by adopting said flawed methods and models. Which explains the previous lawsuits they decided to pay out over the last few years.

Therefore, however unrealistic and unhuman clicking on adverts multiple times a minute can be, it is also not illegal to do so.

>>62188808
Occam's razor my dude.

Is it more likely that a cabal of scriptkiddies with various ideological grudges against a mega corp or a website host with a direct financial incentive is the one who sent 1000 fraudulent clicks?

>>62188840
you need this script >>62179205 for maximum damage

>>62188954
Okay, so they aren't the defacto suspect of click fraud because they have motive. I'd still say they're innocent until proven guilty under any sane terms of service.

File: 1489335918517.gif (295KB, 700x704px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 700x704px

>>62188799
>seriously thinks cookies are cutting edge for tracking users and that deleting cookies every hour is a good way to deal with them
>expecting anyone here to take you seriously

File: 539935231911947.jpg (11KB, 230x219px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 230x219px

>>62189031
i am asking, what else could they use? you still havent answered any of the questions

>>62188996
Yes they are.

And I agree with you on the tos, but google has millions of contracting parties. It would way too much time to investigate. If they see you generating revenue to fast they are just going to flag you and freeze your account. So then all the actual add revenue you have banked cant be accessed.

You could take down a small blog or tumblr in a day by visiting their site with this program running.

>>62189063
>what is localstorage
>what is useragent fingerprinting
>what is canvas fingerprinting
>what are fonts fingerprinting
>what are extension fingerprinting
i could go on and on... and im not even that anon

>>62189152
>Yes they are.
But the people in this thread have motive as well. Meaning they'd be suspect as well, if that (They are the defacto suspect of click fraud because they have motive) is true.

>>62188824
OK, But you are literally advertising ITT that the intent is to defraud google/advertisers out of revenue or damage their reputation.

Thats pretty cut and dry. Is it the pizza delivery stores fault that you ordered pizzas for a house you dont reside at?

Just because a vulnerability exists doesn't mean you can exploit it with malicious intent and remain innocent in the eyes of the law.

>>62189063
privacytools.io

do shit until you pass this test:

panopticlick.eff.org

File: Clipboard01.jpg (12KB, 167x265px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 167x265px

>>62189172
you mean all these things i change every hour while im deleting my cookies? and you seriously expect anyone here to take you seriously? you are just wasting my time

>>62189175
No one fucking knows who these people are!

You cant be a suspect if you arent even a known party.

How can your motive be known if you arent known?

>>62189228
>You cant be a suspect if you arent even a known party.
There have literally been articles about this "party", it's known. Anyway, you just gave another reason why websites aren't the defacto suspect of click fraud because they have motive, there are other reasons like "being known" apparently. And merely having a motive doesn't make you the defacto suspect.

File: Clipboard01.jpg (68KB, 734x558px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 734x558px

>>62189202
i only fail at last section
>unique among the 606,587 tested so far.
wow its fucking nothing

>>62189212
>all these things
>only useragent shown
oh wait you are serious, let me laugh even harder dot jiff

File: 63809971317840.jpg (55KB, 450x373px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 450x373px

>>62189308
dear god, i cant believe im still replying to you, you realize that when i delete cookies i delete every thing? i changed user agent to android/chrome and all fonts/canva/other shit is different? are you literally this retarded?

File: 1501720412968.jpg (130KB, 619x1367px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 619x1367px

>>62178730
WaPo is coming down hard on Jewgle!

https://archive.fo/ysID5

File: 1498257416430.gif (295KB, 700x704px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 700x704px

>>62189212
>he also thinks user agent fingerprinting is cutting edge
Jesus christ. Are you going to show off your addon for dealing with Flash based supercookies next? Please, keep going. I want to experience more nostalgia about what I was using to avoid being tracked circa 2008.

>>62189195
>vulnerability
It is not a vulnerability by any definition. Click on an advert cannot be a vulnerability.

>exploit
Click on an advert cannot be an exploit.

>Malicious intent
There cannot be malicious intent behind clicking an advert.

If their reputation can be damaged by something totally legal, maybe their reputation should be damaged.

>>62189336
>i delete every thing
so do you also delete you operative system fonts and browser profile? or are you retarded? you can only pick one
nyan cat feat bender futurama dot mov

>>62189376
posting this whore doesnt make you look smart nor make you a /g/entelman, all your post are retarded and that how you look to everyone

>>62189390
i have default fonts, tell me how can you tell based on system fonts that i run script

>>62189383
>There cannot be malicious intent behind clicking an advert.
Not him, and I agree with the rest, but it seems most people here definitely have malicious intent by "clicking" on these ads, namely to hurt google.

>>62189299
>unique among the 606,587 tested so far

No, you want it to be not unique. Unique is bad.

File: 1478025898403.png (160KB, 490x480px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 490x480px

>>62189405
>posting this whore doesnt make you look smart nor make you a /g/entelman
>/g/entelman
Holy crossboarders Batman.

>>62189425
>i have default fonts
>default
hahahahaha you don't even know what you are talking about

>>62189450
but how many took the test?

>>62189202
This is such a stupid test, every time I test I get "unique". Which would mean that they wouldn't be able to link those between each other because something changed.

>>62189430
Intent does not matter if it is nothing illegal.

If somebody says "Google is shit", it is obvious this person intents to damage Google's reputation, however it is not illegal.

You can call it whatever "malicious" intent you like. Legally speaking, it is meaningless.

>>62189256
I dont think you are following along.

In this case google has limited information as to the source of the fraudulent clicks. Google will assume that the company who benefits from the fraudulent clicks is the one responsible.

They will not assign the initial blame to an nebulous hypothetical group of cyber vandals unless they have proof.

>>62189383
>There cannot be malicious intent behind clicking an advert.

If I click on adds on my own website with the intention of fraudulently gaining from such action that would be malicious intent.

If I run a program which intentionally clicks adds because I wish to cause economic or reputational damage to google that is malicious intent.

File: Clipboard01.jpg (31KB, 610x195px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 610x195px

>>62189467
so explain, i happy to listen to your theory. also have a list of my fonts, i hope it will help you

>>62189532
>your theory
"others practice", ftfy
are you really this dense or is this some kind of stale b8?

>>62189513
Ok if you are clicking adverts on your own adverts of course it is a click fraud. But that is not the case here.

Intent to damage reputation does not suddenly make something legal illegal.

>>62189390
>operative system

>>62189563
so you cant tell how am i different from other people? could it be because im not unique? no, surely not. 1400 other people that took this test have the same fonts as me, thoe are literally default font, on a fresh xp installation, you cant get fresher than this, oh you mean that one javascript font? probably from google.com because i didnt visit any other site on this system

File: dbc8fd66b2[1].png (63KB, 1130x513px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 1130x513px

>>62189575
>>62189510
Get a brain morans

Google " Tort of interference" Or "Economic interference"

You cant just fuck with peoples businesses for fun.

>>62189532
If you disable Java, that list should not appear at all.

>>62189655
>Java
>in a browser
>in 2017

>>62189655
java or javascript?

>>62179977
>top 4 search results are ads
Is Google even any useful without an adblocker?

>>62189618
>app
?

>>62189626
ok i'll take the summerfag stale b8
>literally default font
nope
>on a fresh
wrong, you have adobe and office products installed
>xp installation
wrong yet again, but i don't think i need to tell you why
>that one javascript font? probably from google.com
holy fuck, why has no genius invented fist fighting via tcp/ip yet? we need that shit niggas, badly!

File: ______________________________________never_ever.png (572KB, 600x580px) Image search: [Google]

572KB, 600x580px

>>62189736
well of course id not tell you my main os/browser, but linux doesnt have any of these problems, you can suck my balls

>>62189642
All of the points cannot be proven.

Not sure what this is about.

>>62189770
>you can suck my balls
>t. has no balls
good, you leave now, and stay leave

File: 1469130561940.jpg (13KB, 332x332px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 332x332px

>>62189823
because you ate them

>>62189837
>being ecstatic about being unable to propagate your defective/faulty/retarded/+1-chromosome genes any further down the gene pool
i guess it is for a good cause, your disappointed father, and the remainder of the world, might thank me later on

File: 1473179602977.png (956KB, 800x1350px) Image search: [Google]

956KB, 800x1350px

>>62189912
you still havent proved that google can differentiate between me and thousands of her people, all your screaching is about things that are shared amont multiple users, thousands at minumum and only on sites with thousand tested. your claims have no real meaning in real world but keep trying

>>62189956
>pls spoofeed
>t. actual retard
nah, i thought you were just pretending, i'm fine as it is rite naw
have fun being among "thousands of her people" :^)

File: Clipboard01.jpg (3KB, 185x60px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 185x60px

>>62190128
lmao how does this make you feel? probably nothing because you are paid, but tell your boss i wont stop, it will only get worse for you