As a common mad scientist invention, everyone knows about the

File: IMG_2921.jpg (35KB, 278x498px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 278x498px

>>62166001

No. It makes no goddamn sense.

File: IMG_2923.png (883KB, 922x705px) Image search: [Google]

883KB, 922x705px

>>62166007

>>62166001
>I am going to decrease the size of each unit molecule smaller than a molecule
Not possible

I don't think a raygun is possible. And shrinking seems impossible. But I could see someone finding a way to chemically grow someone huge

>>62166042
no it would just remove duplicates DUH

>>62166001
>>62166042
maybe if it deleted every second molecule and tied the remaining ones together?

I would rather not have it used on anything living though.

>>62166001

Explain how it would work.

>Hard Mode:
> use science and shit

I would just like to see the tech used purely recreationally

File: IMG_2827.jpg (225KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 1024x768px

>>62166133

>>62166091
But would an object with only half it's molecules even be that object anymore? Would it even function the same? And how would you even remove all those molecule with the object remaining structurally intact ?

>>62166308
it seems like a fairly unfruitful endeavour

>>62166174
>>62166415
Watermelons are fruits hahaha

>>62166110
If you subscribe to an infinite reality theory, then there must be one where something is much smaller or larger. Then it might be possible to create some sort of wormhole to transfer the two objects between the realities

>>62166001
Like what summer did in the rick and morty from last week? xD summer is my wifeu

File: IMG_2750.png (1MB, 1437x1060px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1437x1060px

>>62166731
Boob-yah

>>62166001
Not unless we figure out how to manipulate the atomic forces that space atoms.

Remove all the space between your atoms and you'll be the size of the tip of a pin.

>>62166781
would increase the forces acted upon atoms by their neighbors, no?
>>62166745
Hnggg

File: Chrono.Trigger.full.128960.jpg (144KB, 566x800px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 566x800px

Maybe you'll find out one day OP when your g/f has to use it on your willy wonklet.

kek --> ! K E K !

>>62166001
I hope so, I will steal it, find some hot girls and make them giant

File: IMG_2832.jpg (359KB, 2720x1006px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 2720x1006px

>>62166731
That may have already been done secretly

>>62166001
Probably not, but you can build a pretty effective death ray out of common microwave parts

>>62166799
Ouch

>>62166042
>>I am going to decrease the size of each pixel smaller than a pixel

Nigga how does scaling work?

Just take two molecules and make a synthesis of both. Shit, just removing one of each pair and fixing the bonds should work.

>>62166001
To shrink/grow an object you would be changing the volume. This would involve either increasing mass or decreasing density (in the case of growing the object in size) or decreasing mass or increasing density (in the case of shrinkjng the object).

Either is stupid and not feasible. We can assume mass won't change or you'd be removing molecules as others would say. So density would be the limit. You'd probably just implode or explode the object that point.

>>62166110
compression, like smoke in reverse. detail folds up into its own field.

>>62166042
It is possible, but as of now, I have no idea what means we could use to get there.

>>62167295
That would absolutely wreck your DNA.

>>62167853
honey I do not think these are our kids anymore

File: IMG_2747.gif (612KB, 333x250px) Image search: [Google]

612KB, 333x250px

>>62168017
Such drastic changes haha

>>62168070
That would be a bad use of the technology

>>62166884
!!!

>>62166745
oh shit I didn't see this episode yet

File: purest smith.jpg (281KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 1600x900px

Just use magic stupids

>>62168999
It doesn't end well