What if an advertiser agreed with a website to point the DNS

>load the actual website off a subdomain

So just visit the "actual website" and not the domain that injects the ads?

>>62150532
This would probably break all hosts-file based or DNS based adblockers.
It wouldn't work on browser extensions though, which targets the javascript elements and stops them directly.

What's the best anti-anti-adblock?

>>62150532
This is already done via server-side ad injection. Blocking is done on cosmetic filters. It is an arms race for sure.

>>62150668
The advertiser could control the DNS as well and generate a random subdomain name which expires every few hours

>>62150683
>>62150723
The "loader" could use some shit like shadow dom to make the elements impossible to detect via cosmetic filtering

>>62150839
Adblockers would just start to use statistical models. Only real way to combat this is native advertising, though FTC rules limit this a bit.

>>62151012
If ad blockers have to do heavy statistical calculations to block ads then wouldnt it really slow down loading times?

>>62151058
Can share this cross browsers. And most of the calcs are gonna be straightforward.

>>62150532
donT use GUI

>>62150532
adblocking is immoral. THE END