Why is this so insanely low?

>>62146684
it just werks

consider trying a modern webbrowser

>>62146684
>Shit hardware
>Old browser
>RIGGED benchmark
IDK you tell me

>>62146718
chromium is DOUBLE but still only 80

why?

>>62146684
>>62146737
I get the same results on a laptop I got for 700$ in 2011
so if your machine is not that shit then yeah, there's a problem here. I would start by uninstalling kbloat

>>62146684
>using KDE
bait thread, no one is this stupid

File: truth.png (282KB, 1511x618px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 1511x618px

>>62146684

File: f.png (125KB, 1920x1040px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1920x1040px

Mine's a bit better

>>62146718
this
>>62146737
chromium/chromium based gets 100+ here

>>62146684
Because Gecko was designed in a time when webpages didn't move around all the time.
Servo will fix it.

>>62149062
Servo is still garbage.

>>62147031
That image is wrong.

Second should be "Sane people" and third image is "Normal people" which is an iPhone photo of the screen.

File: DHMYXAzWsAEuzMQ.jpg (64KB, 777x678px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 777x678px

>>62146684
what movie?

File: amphetamines.png (56KB, 1113x764px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 1113x764px

I got this on my laptop with about 70 tabs open, a bunch having some resource heavy shit, and a shit-ton of programs open in the background. On Chrome.

File: 2017-08-29 at 1.12.08 PM.png (89KB, 1159x800px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 1159x800px

Chrome. 178Mbps Down/740Mbps Up. Sierra 10.12.6 on Mac Pro 15 (Mid - 15).

File: file.png (72KB, 1058x763px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 1058x763px

Chrome here

>>62146684
I Spit On Your Grave?

>>62148986
>>62149738
>>62150019
>>62150086
B O T N E T
O
T
N
E
T

>>62149305
>will

File: vivaldi.png (156KB, 1056x1580px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1056x1580px

>>62146684
1.11.917.43 (Stable channel) (64-bit) on an Aspire V3 - 772 G running Ubuntu 16.04

File: firefox.png (143KB, 1056x1580px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 1056x1580px

>>62151111
55.0.2 (64-bit) on the same platform.

how long is this supposed to take? its been 10 minutes and im on 46, this laptop is dead cancer

>>62151598
not that long even on my shitty laptop AFAIR. I suggest debloating and instaling arch+i3

I got a score of less than 37 (54.0.1). Maybe my addons are fucking my browser.

File: 207.png (109KB, 1284x881px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 1284x881px

Freetards btfo once again :-)

>>62153797
>doesn't show the URL bar
gee I wonder why

>>62153734
Possibly, but if it's an older computer or some messed up shit going on in the background that could also be a problem.
All modern browsers on modern devices should be getting 60+ at least. Chromium based 100+.

>Everyone posting benchmarks tested on different machines

Chrome gives me in the 70's, while Qutebrowser gives me in the 80's. T420.
Score one for the good guys.