>>62133799
no.
uefi has a feature called secure boot. if secure boot is enabled, you will only be allowed to boot into a signed bootloader. it's like on android smartphones. but secure boot is useless because a) it has been cracked, and b) microsoft signed some ubuntu or red hat GRUB bootloader, so we can use that to boot into any OS we want.manufacturers can make secure boot mandatory if they want, such as on "windows signature" branded computers.
>>62133799
yes and certain uefi enabled power supples are too..
only way to be sure is to unplug from the wall
I am french and I was forced to post in this thread by the picture.
>>62133799
it is bios with mouse also you can update firmware over the innernet
>need to update firmware because usb drive doesn't boot
>have update on usb drive
>install is from live disc
>update firmware
>update fucked os stability need to reinstall
uefi solves this bullshit
>>62135246
Marre de ces cliché !
La France est multiculturel je demande un Pepe marron au yeux bridé !
>>62133799
Yes
>>62135726
>t. gauchiasse
>>62135081
Dude I love 802.11PSU
>>62135800
Serais-tu raciste?
Je propose de montrer notre soutient au minorité en rajoutant de magnifique cheveux Affro au Pepe français !
La beauté est dans le métissage! Heureusement que les enfants l'ont compris car leur coeur est pur au contraire des raciste que vous êtes!
>>62133799
I have a feeling that it makes it easier to write portable firmware backdoors by presenting clean interfaces to everything (the network interfaces, etc), but I'm not sure
it contains a lot more code than a regular bios so it's bound to have more (security) bugs at least
5/10 probably not (intentionally) botnet
Can I write a web browser as an UEFI application?
>>62133799
Yes. It's a BIOS, a Botnet Input Output System.
No, it's an open standard.