>move from ISP DNS to Google DNS because ISPs selling data

>>62132943
>I should move to now.
Zeronet

>>62132943
I also need an alternative

whatever dnscrypt is pre-configured to.

>>62132943
OpenNIC

>>62132943
Your own DNS resolver
how hard is this for you people?

Move to Level 3 then move to CCC

>>62132943
>he doesn't browse the web using exclusively IP addresses

>>62132981
what is ccc?

Level 3 is being bought out senpai

D-dont ask how I know...

>>62132943
Just use Hurricane Electric's DNS

File: 1503937677684.png (184KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 1920x1080px

>>62132991
good luck with that

File: 1473251024673.png (40KB, 939x350px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 939x350px

>>62132991
*blocks your path*

>>62133071
you do know that you can spoof the Host header?

>>62133014
Chaos Computer Club

>>62132943
ISPs use that data for their own ad networks and don't sell it. Who are they going to sell it to? Google?

>>62133168
CCC is infested with delusional leftists

>>62133239
That's Europe for you

>>62132974
How is the performance of local dns?

>>62132943
If you don't want anyone to mess with your queries then use DNS root servers. It's gonna be slow tho

>>62133239
CCC has plenty of good people, they are just quieter.

>>62135058
you can make a recursive caching resolver faster by running a cache warming script

File: zn.png (33KB, 1383x163px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 1383x163px

>>62132960
Zeronet is good in concept but not implementation. I am holding out for IPFS 1.0

>>62132943
stick with your ISP DNS (except when using VPN of course) because you are already force to connect to them, why spread your info out to other companies unnecessarily?

also
>>62132974
If you want for frequently visited sites.

>>62132943
>not using superior cjdns

pleb

>>62132943
>2017
>not using dnscrypt
>being this unfree

File: opennic.png (21KB, 300x125px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 300x125px

openNIC

lets meme it /g/ents

>>62132972
/thread

>>62133537
Significantly better than the performance of remote DNS

OpenNIC
DnsCrypt
ZeroNet

Level 3 has public DNS servers.
So does Verisign
so does Comodo
There's also OpenNIC.

>>62132974
how do you propagate your DNS though?

you still need to call out to external DNS when you need to visit a sites address that isnt listed or cached locally

what do you use in that case?

>>62132943
You do realize that DNS requests are sent in the clear, so your ISP reads every request you make.

Better just to go directly through your ISP.

opennic

>>62135735
>>62135374
ding ding ding

>>62132972
>>62132972
>>62132972
>>62132972
>>62132972
>>62135639

>>62132943
>now OpenDNS is botnet by censoring free speech

What happened?

>>62132974
Thats bretty hard anon. Most IT ppl, dont know shit bout DNS.

>>62135810
This is a wise lad.

>>62135854
OpenDNS is generally falsely assumed to be open software but the Open isnt open like libre or even open source software

its also owned by cisco

>>62133537
Slower than usual I assume

>>62133537
it's literally just there to tell your router an IP. do you really think performance could be bad?

File: bernie_establishment_tool.png (494KB, 681x521px) Image search: [Google]

494KB, 681x521px

>>62135891
reminds me of this, we need an opendns version.

>>62135891
Eeh Cisco/OpenDNS is good in my book. They made DNScrypt which is open source and useful.
What's wrong with them? And no, the fact that they sell proprietary software is not a reason.

>>62135317
Just because you can track someone's username doesn't mean you can
a) impersonate them, since all the messages are signed with that user key
b) track them, since the file(s) you get might not even come from that peer
That pic just show how ignorant people can be.

Still IPFS is "apparently" faster but I always run into tiny/no swarms when looking for files, so many nodes are dead. Needs to be more user friendly to allow normies to run a node just like they do with torrents.

File: wow what a faggot.png (122KB, 353x531px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 353x531px

>stops using something because their PR has a political ideology

>>62132943

You should get it over with and skip straight to suicide

>>62138864
This. The opinions of a company do not have any affect on the development of software whatsoever.

>>62138864
/pol/ invades every time something technology related happens in normie politics, they'll get bored and forget about it by next month
there are already excellent reasons to avoid google regardless

Has anyone made a list of DNS providers and the crap they do, so everyone can make an informed-ish decision.


I believed you cunts about level3 DNS but then they started redirecting me to search pages.

>>62139017
Just use opendns