What do you think about AdNauseam? Do you believe it has a real

See >>62116737
sage

If AdNauseam really screws goolag ads, is there anyway to automate this. I mean like when your PC is idle or say overnight, visit random sites and let AdNauseam do it's work?

>>62120438
>If AdNauseam really screws goolag ads, is there anyway to automate this. I mean like when your PC is idle or say overnight, visit random sites and let AdNauseam do it's work?
Of course.
http://makeinternetnoise.com/index.html

Or go to your favorite hated website like CNN.com and have an auto-refresh every minute.

It's the nuclear option. It destroys a bunch of good websites as well as bad websites, because the people who use it are triggered babies who can't just stop visiting the websites they don't like.

There must be other ways to destroy Google and Facebook and the bad parts of YouTube.

>>62120596
>It destroys a bunch of good websites
If you use it on good websites.
You can have a whitelist/blacklist system.
They have an option that blocks but does not click on the adds that respect the "DO NOT TRACK" order. Thus showing ad companies what they can do in order to stop these "disturbances".

Much like any adblock. Except this one is worse for them.

>>62120438
Can you imagine if there was some Malware out there that did nothing but quietly install AdNauseam on people's browsers?

Just think about it: Customer ad data for millions (or even billions) of people is unusable all of the sudden.

>>62121204
>Just think about it: Customer ad data for millions (or even billions) of people is unusable all of the sudden.
Would be great. Ad companies would HAVE to respect the "do not track" order in order to function.

eh