Hey, Windows haters. Here's a simple challenge for you.

encrypted, hardcoded, saged

>>62116137

There's the first one, lol

It's sold as a "feature" of Windows that it has telemetry and a bunch of features that ping the internet by default. Why do we need to provide a packet capture to prove that these "features" exist, unless you think that Microsoft is lying? In which case why are you trusting them with your private information?

>>62116128
You didn't get any replies to your post so you made an entire thread, huh.

>>62116128
Windows has been spying on people since the 90s. I don't mind Linux users bashing Windows, they have good reasons. But when a Windows 7 user bashed Windows 10 it's the most eye-roll inducing shit ever.

>>62116128
It's a meme that was created on /g/ long before Windows 10 was released. If you have to ask, no, it's not even based on anything. Notice how no one outside of /g/ even discusses about the supposed spying. Prepare for edited wireshark webms that were made on /g/ to bait newfags like you into believing that windows 10 is ((( botnet )))
>protip: it isn't

Its not that they are spying on all users at all time, it's they can allegedly flip a switch and begin spying if they want, or do whatever else they want.

File: 1486715747456.jpg (83KB, 1082x818px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 1082x818px

>>62116128

>Hey, Christianity haters. Here's a simple challenge for you. If God isn't real, prove it.
>Flip-flop-dippity-gumbo-chops - 1
>people with intelligence - 0

File: Windows 10 spying.png (452KB, 642x4353px) Image search: [Google]

452KB, 642x4353px

>>62116128

>I'm a brainlet
t. OP
sage

Does anyone know what to do with this?
CVE-2017-8620

File: win10spygoog.png (8KB, 288x163px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 288x163px

>>62116128
>>62117658
>no one outside of g

>>62116128
>If Windows is spying on its users at all times like you claim
Actually, Microsoft claims that. Search: "telemetry".

>>62117106
>doing exactly what OP said you would do

File: IMG_3886.jpg (15KB, 386x216px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 386x216px

>>62118895

File: 2014-07-19_01-35-38.png (23KB, 123x126px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 123x126px

>>62117959

>>62119256
tip: look at some webpages titles

File: 123.png (34KB, 300x100px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 300x100px

>>62119256

It can't be proven except by people inside Microsoft. That's the whole point you retard fuck. It is a proprietary OS, it cannot be studied and MS have gone to great lengths to make outgoing traffic impossible to detect. Everyone knows Windows is malicious.

>>62116128
I don't need to. All I need to do is read. I don't even need the TOS or Privacy Policy. Just the prompts in the OS itself paint a grim picture. MS is not ashamed of gathering data about you, the important thing is we don't know what they do with it so we just assume the worst.

File: botnet.webm (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>62116128
It's not even a question that Windows 10 reports everything you do to Microsoft constantly

File: botnet2.webm (1MB, 1718x938px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1718x938px

>>62116128
>>62119458
Even with all the privacy options turned on. That's why it was released for free - you and everything you do are the product they sell. There's no such thing as a free lunch

Always a shitty thread like this one here, it doesn't fucking matter as long as you are happy with your system!

I wasnt happy with Windows, so I ditched it and I have never been happier, I don't fucking care if someone is using Windows or even Fag.

Faggots everywhere

>>62119501
Does this apply to like Win10 Enterprise with all that peerblock stuff?

Like information still goes through?

>>62119550
If it connects it goes through

>>62119458
There are a billion problems for someone working on the Windows OS to solve, realistically, they have no chance in hell solving those without a meticulous stack trace covering every level.
>botnet
No, business.

>>62116128
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgs9g-Q-Zm8

>windows
lmao

>>62119505
This, I agree with you anon

>>62119397
> inb4 a lot of emotional responses but no hard evidence

File: 15.png (293KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 633x758px

>>62116128
I can't

File: imaqtpie.png (157KB, 1045x780px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 1045x780px

>>62116128
>being this ignorant on /g/