>using any text editor other than gedit

File: Untitled.png (28KB, 968x108px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 968x108px

>using abandonware

>>62058946
Cretin.

>>62058959
>abandonware
>still can have a maintainer any time

File: fraje.png (35KB, 151x189px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 151x189px

>he doesn't use mousepad

S U B L I M E

File: 235848-rubber.jpg (12KB, 506x640px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 506x640px

>>62058959
>he lets the daily trend spoon feed him what software to use
>>62059002
>he does not use gedit
>>62059953
>he uses mousepad
>he uses a text editor for xfce
>he uses xfce
>he does not use gnome
>>62060239
>he uses proprietary garbagetrash

>>62060317
what's wrong with nano? it's basically the same thing as gedit.

File: 1503202791750.jpg (77KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 500x500px

>>62060317
>Gnome

Vim

>>62058946
>GNOME
Garbage. Anything based on it is shit too.

>He bloats his system with an entire desktop environment

Shouldn't you be elsewhere

>>62058946
Emacs os is the best

>>62058946
It's not even maintained anymore, even though I'm on GNOME I want to use another one, maybe I'll try Leafpad or something, redpill me on text editors, /g/.

>>62058946
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gedit-list/2017-July/msg00001.html

Vim is the best

>>62061538

#!/bin/bash
case "$1" in
    *.doc)
        antiword -frs -i 1 "$1" > /tmp/antiword
        leafpad /tmp/antiword &
    ;;
    *.docx)
        docx2txt.sh "$1"
        leafpad "${1%.*}".txt && rm "${1%.*}".txt ) &
    ;;
    *.odt)
        odt2txt "$1" --width=-1 --output=/tmp/odt2txt
        leafpad /tmp/odt2txt &
    ;;
    *.rtf)
        unrtf "$1" --text --nopict --quiet > /tmp/unrtftxt
        leafpad /tmp/unrtftxt &
        unrtf "$1" --nopict --quiet > /tmp/unrtf
        firefox --new-tab /tmp/unrtf &
    ;;
    *.djvu)
        notify-send 'Working, please wait...'
        ddjvu -format=pdf -skip "$1" "${1%.*}".pdf
        mupdf "${1%.*}".pdf &
    ;;
esac

its good but it's like notepad

for programming you might want mousepad or just nano with syntax highlighting

I think I tried that years ago. Is the middle mouse button still permanently bound to paste?

File: 1496565335139.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>Using any text editor other than vim

>>62061369
I'll bloat yours mum's pussy with my cock if you catch my drift.

Vim, with gedit for quick graphical stuff

>>62061567
Isn't vim more effective?

>>62061846
>graphical
What are you, a gimp?

>>62061905
if I am in the file explorer and I am seeing files, it's quicker with gedit than opening a terminal for vim

>>62061861
whatever suits your fancy

File: image_12_0.jpg (18KB, 636x398px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 636x398px

>>62061803
I really don't, please explain

>>62058946
>using an abandoned, crippled editor based on GTK without proper plugin API, by extension without proper plugins and scroll bugs that can't into opening large files, handling binary files and much more
I might as well use a "clever" and "fast" haxxor editor like vim or emacs.
t. GNOME user

File: 1487171094458.jpg (192KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 800x1000px

>>62058946
>Using a graphic editor, and not VIM.
Unforgivable