I'm arguing with my coworker on the fact that USB 3.0 is

C IS better than C++

>>62048960

BY THE WAY. I have tested it myself, when I type on my keyboard using USB 2.0 it's much slower, you can see it on the screen.

>>62048960
If you need 5Gbps over 480Mbps to send keyboard and mouse polling... what the fuck?

C is better.

>>62048970

Windows Vista was made in C.

Windows 10 in C++.

/thread

>>62048985
exactly ffs

>>62048960
My mouse and keyboard are usb 2.0, but I still plug them unto my 3.0 slots because autism.

>>62049013
They get no benefit.

Your drivers for your proprietary shit OS are probably fucked.

3.0 uses a slightly different polling method which can improve latency

It's so minuscule however that any claim that it makes a difference is guaranteed placebo

File: 1500762924996.jpg (36KB, 610x574px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 610x574px

>>62048960
>help me here /g/ I need some evidence to back up my facts.
In other words you're arguing, but you don't know jack shit. Therefore, you have to make a fucking retard of yourself on a mongolian powerpoint imageboard so that you can be told what your beliefs are?

File: 1497798620651.png (690KB, 932x492px) Image search: [Google]

690KB, 932x492px

>>62048960
>I'm arguing with my coworker on the fact that USB 3.0 is also faster for keyboard and mouse.
Read the specs? Are you literate?

>>62048991
And windows 10 is a botnet

>>62048970
>>62048985
>brainlets
>>62048960
He's a total Jerry, OP.

File: 1503478312955.png (143KB, 629x1173px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 629x1173px

>>62048960
Are you stupid? No, seriously. C is objectively a better language in all ways except for # of features (although it still stands up to C++ in a stupidly high amount of tasks), and PS/2 is objectively more optimal for keyboards (REAL NKRO, anyone?)

Your friend is probably better suited here than your dumb fucking head.

>>62048970
do compiler extensions support restrict pointers for C++ yet?

>>62050106
Therefore C++ is a botnet.