Well /g/, what's your excuse for not using pale moon?

>>62038337
I use Icecat which is truly FOSS and recommended by GNU

>>62038337
because iridium exists

>>62038337
The same reason I don't use CoffeeScript

same reason I don't use a 5 year old version of any browser

>>62038337
I don't need to use it, that's my excuse.
v55.0.2 x64 works perfectly fine with "nglayout.initialpaint.delay;0".

>>62038337
I intend to but I haven't gotten around to.

Is there a Pale Moon equivalent of the ghacks user.js that automatically hardens the browser? I know a lot of the stuff in there was junk that mozilla added after PM forked, but I don't know which stuff. And going through a thousand prefs by hand is tiresome.

It's not up to date with security fixes, is a one-man show and has no future (f.e. dev will not add webextensions and nobody will develop XUL addons for a niche browser)

Why would you use some outdated shit fork? The moment a new exploit is out there you will get owned because fork projects like Pale Moon don't get updated fast enough.

>>62038337
I don't need an excuse. Firefox works for me.

>>62039999
quads of deceit

>>62040115
>t. mozshill

>>62040730
go back to /lgbt/

>>62038337
Was using palememe but it kept having troubles running certain addons and sometimes I would get 'stopped working' errors upon closing it so I switchet to Iridium

>>62038337
BSOD